You see, dear, dumb, Melanie, harassing people on the Internet is actually a crime. You're begging your loser friends to "leave an honest review" and tell the internet to "do their thang", but only an idiot does not know these are euphemisms to harass and annoy those you dislike for no legitimate reason.
Oh, you can piss and moan and bitch and whine all you want. But you and your wannabe Anonymous friends must have slept through Constitution classes or you'd realize free speech has limitations in America.
From Wikipedia: "Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment (and therefore may be restricted) include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, and commercial speech such as advertising. Defamation that causes harm to reputation is a tort and also an exception to free speech."
CIVIL LAW
You can't slander others, Melanie Larkin. Calling me a child rapist when I have not been accused of, much less convicted of, rape, is slander. Similar torts include libel, defamation of character and false light statements.
In your TikTok videos that have been taken down (but I still managed to save) you ADMIT malice, which is one of the elements of proving any of these civil torts. So, should I decide you're worth dragging to court, you've already provided me with ample evidence. You see, this blog isn't just for shits and giggles, this is also where I show that I've collected screenshots as evidence of malice. So thanks for proving a case against you.
CRIMINAL LAW
Since many of your cohorts (which, for all I know, is just one of your many Facebook accounts anyways) have chosen to make threatening statements against me and others, you are actually engaging in criminal acts.
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1310
Current with changes through the 2021 Special Legislative Session
Section 28-1310 - Intimidation by telephone call or electronic communication; penalty
(1) A person commits the offense of intimidation by telephone call or electronic communication if, with intent to intimidate, threaten, or harass an individual, the person telephones such individual or transmits an electronic communication directly to such individual, whether or not conversation or an electronic response ensues, and the person:
(a) Uses obscene language or suggests any obscene act;
(b) Threatens to inflict physical or mental injury to such individual or any other person or physical injury to the property of such individual or any other person; or
(c) Attempts to extort property, money, or other thing of value from such individual or any other person.
(2) The offense shall be deemed to have been committed either at the place where the call or electronic communication was initiated or where it was received.
(3) Intimidation by telephone call or electronic communication is a Class III misdemeanor.
(4) For purposes of this section, electronic communication means any writing, sound, visual image, or data of any nature that is received or transmitted by an electronic communication device as defined in section 28-833.
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1310
Since WAR is based out of Missouri--
Title XXXVIII CRIMES AND PUNISHMENT; PEACE OFFICERS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS
Chapter 565
565.225. Stalking, first degree, penalty. — 1. As used in this section and section 565.227, the term "disturbs" shall mean to engage in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that serves no legitimate purpose and that would cause a reasonable person under the circumstances to be frightened, intimidated, or emotionally distressed.
2. A person commits the offense of stalking in the first degree if he or she purposely, through his or her course of conduct, disturbs or follows with the intent of disturbing another person and:
(1) Makes a threat communicated with the intent to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety, the safety of his or her family or household member, or the safety of domestic animals or livestock as defined in section 276.606 kept at such person's residence or on such person's property. The threat shall be against the life of, or a threat to cause physical injury to, or the kidnapping of the person, the person's family or household members, or the person's domestic animals or livestock as defined in section 276.606 kept at such person's residence or on such person's property; or
(2) At least one of the acts constituting the course of conduct is in violation of an order of protection and the person has received actual notice of such order; or
(3) At least one of the actions constituting the course of conduct is in violation of a condition of probation, parole, pretrial release, or release on bond pending appeal; or
(4) At any time during the course of conduct, the other person is seventeen years of age or younger and the person disturbing the other person is twenty-one years of age or older; or
(5) He or she has previously been found guilty of domestic assault, violation of an order of protection, or any other crime where the other person was the victim; or
(6) At any time during the course of conduct, the other person is a participant of the address confidentiality program under sections 589.660 to 589.681, and the person disturbing the other person knowingly accesses or attempts to access the address of the other person.
3. Any law enforcement officer may arrest, without a warrant, any person he or she has probable cause to believe has violated the provisions of this section.
4. This section shall not apply to activities of federal, state, county, or municipal law enforcement officers conducting investigations of any violation of federal, state, county, or municipal law.
5. The offense of stalking in the first degree is a class E felony, unless the defendant has previously been found guilty of a violation of this section or section 565.227, or any offense committed in another jurisdiction which, if committed in this state, would be chargeable or indictable as a violation of any offense listed in this section or section 565.227, or unless the victim is intentionally targeted as a law enforcement officer, as defined in section 556.061, or the victim is targeted because he or she is a relative within the second degree of consanguinity or affinity to a law enforcement officer, in which case stalking in the first degree is a class D felony.
(L. 1993 H.B. 476 & 194 § 1, A.L. 2002 S.B. 969, et al., A.L. 2008 S.B. 818 & 795, A.L. 2014 S.B. 491, A.L. 2016 H.B. 1562, A.L. 2017 S.B. 34)
-- You can get charged with a crime, and you could be arrested and extradited and let me tell you as a person who was extradicted for a crime I did not commit, you will NOT like the extradition process at all, and New York is a long ways from Nebraska, and they don't fly you here nor will you arrive in a reasonable length of time.
You disagree with me? Good. You hate me? Good. You whine online? Even better! But, there ARE limits to what you can say or do.
But at the end of the day, i'll keep on fighyting to ABOLISH THE REGISTRY, and there is NOTHING you or your cohorts can do about it. No amount of TikToking or trolling will EVER change that.
PS: It took me maybe 15 minutes to type this, so if you think it took me hours to laugh at you in my last post, you're sadly mistaken.
 |
| Threats are not speech |
 |
| Melanie's associate admitting to making harassing phone calls |
 |
| "Addy Lonewolf" confession part 2 |
 |
Addy Lonewolf confession part 3 |
Melanie claimed in a now-deleted TikTok video that she only asked people to go "leave an honest review" but it seems to me that all of Melanie Larkin's dumbassed friends understand what she meant by that.
ADDENDUM 3/11/22, I've been collecting data on some of the "CrayolaSec" Anonymous group. A few are lazy enough to have posted info that reveals their identity. Basement-dewlling 'Anonymous" fucks, I don't forgive or forget, either. You should have expected me.
7 comments:
My personal stalker claims that Ron Book did not drive drunk because he was not "convicted."
Since you are illiterate, Shaun, let me clue you into something.
https://www.tampabay.com/news/crime/2021/09/09/prominent-florida-lobbyist-ron-book-pleads-to-reckless-driving/
Ron Book took a sweetheart plea deal, but if he was innocent, why did he take a deal to a reduced charge of reckless driving if he was innocent? Also, unlike in the false theft charges against me that were dropped because video evidence had proven my innocence, in this case, there was ample video evidence Ron Book was under the influence at the time of his arrest. Ron Book refused a breathalyzer test.
Ron Book used his money and influence to get off lightly. But it does not take away from the fact that Ron Book was arrested for DUI and there was definitive evidence he was guilty, AND he pleaded guilty to a lesser charge in relation to the DUI. He's every bit guilty as sin, you complete fucktard. No amount of crying like a little bitch will change that. Fuck Ron Book, fuck his cocksucking daughter, and most of all, fuck YOU.
Melanie the Moron actually thinks people are rallying behind her ROFLMAO!
I know the fucknut is readiing this, so...
If a FloriDUH State Senator can't shut me down, what makes this blonde cunt and her wannabe Anonymous friends can? And why does she bob her head like a loose turd in all her videos?
I'm having a good laugh watching you and your loser friends dig yourself into a pit, just like the other losers I have featured on my blog.
You should have stuck with discussing queefs and spider vaginas since that is more on your level LOL
I've been entertained by my new troll "friends" including the dumb Russian bear who thought deleting a burner account was going to put a dent in my activities. But just like his fellow idiot Melanoma Larkin, I can just go make multiple accounts :)
But seriously, though, what do thy hope to achive? Do they honestly think that by a simple, minor inconvenience, they're sgoing to make me give up my fight to ABOLISH the registry? That saying mean things about me is going to make me quit? This blog is a list of many who tried and failed-- vigilante groups, personal stalkers, hell, even Florida's most powerful and corrupt lobbyist and his State Senator daughter tried and failed.
But hey, keep on TikToking and ranting on Facebook and whatnot. The real world doesn't revolve around that crap, and while you folks are busy crying on social media, I'm going to be busy working on changing the laws in places that matter. Keep seething :)
Keep seething, trolls. At least learn to spell, though. LOL
How does it feel to flail and thrash and gnash your teeth knowing that your hero failed in her efforts to silence my First Amendment rights?
PS, Nicholai is getting deported to Russia LOL
my new troll buddies think getting burner accounts deleted is winning the war. (Ironically, they're using burner accounts to try to get our burner accounts deleted LOL)
I personally don't care about social media. It is only useful to expose these frauds since they boast of crimes committed, like the idiot who not only boasted of committing harassing communications violations and even screnshot how she did it.
By the way, I don't care about burner accounts. I'll keep making them and keep having you losers run all over the Internet until you run ragged. I have fun making you numbnuts run around the Internet all day, and while you're spending all day making videos and whining about me, I'll be lqaughing at you. Later, LOSERS! LOL
Addy Lonewolf is the dumbest cunt of them all. Thanks to her dumb ass I've been uncovering the identities to many of the trolls. I was waiting for her to do what she claimed she would do in the screenshots but she pussed oit.
They actually think deleting a burner account is "winning" yet many of them have multiple accounts because they also get their accounts deleted regularly.
BTW I have multiple accounts just like you losers, good luck finding them all.
But I do not not forgive or forget, either, losers!
Post a Comment