Saturday, September 12, 2015

#OpDereksTears already admits defeat. Game Over!

A couple of weeks ago, Val's imaginary friend declared "#OpDereksTears", another lame attempt to try to ruin my life. Over the years, they've tried interfering in court cases, writing letters to my neighbors, a half dozen hate sites, 3 am phone calls, and following me around the Internet. I was hoping they would try something different this time, like an actual face-to-face encounter.

Quote: "'already anticipating failure' I think you could just look in the mirror if you need an example of failure, no? I'm currently dealing with a small number of unknown variables. The answer from one action will determine if there's a need for another. It's really not that difficult to understand. 'Harassing folks is not legal' I'm not harassing you. Telling the truth about someone/ something to another person is completely legal. Unless you'd like to cite some case law I'm not aware of. Your status as a registered *** doesn't give you blanket immunity from the consequence of your actions no matter how much you'd like to imaging (sic) that it does. I have absolutely zero interest in meeting you for any reason. Feel free to consider that as some kind of win. It's not like I'm overly concerned with the opinions of **** 'try something original this time' Why would I be doing anything else? This is the only communication you'll be receiving directly from me."

I suppose I should take a moment to address the bullshit. I asked her to try something original because they have tried and failed using the same routine. Ever played Madden football with someone who picks the Hail Mary every time he chooses a play? Well, this clown is just like that. Why ask for something different? Perhaps it is because ALL previous strategies have failed miserably. I assure you that the answer from will action will be failure, and the action from your next course of action will be failure. Your unknown variable are that it will fail, it is illegal, and you will be outed and subject to arrest, prosecution, and/or a civil suit. 

By the way, the registry warns folks against the misuse of registry info. There is also a number of laws against harassing anyone, not just registered citizens. If this person was indeed doing something heroic and legal, there would be no need to hide like a chickenshit. Oh, and just in case you wanted to read some statutes, there's THIS

Bottom Line: Barely a week passed and already they are admitting defeat! Once again, vigi-scum throws in the towel. I'm disappointed Vag's imaginary friend doesn't have the guts to meet me face to face but I'm not surprised it took the coward's way out again.

Just like all the previous operations, #OpDereksTears failed miserably. This was so lame, I didn't even get to cry tears of laughter.

#OpDereksTears is out in one punch.

Monday, August 31, 2015

Meet the LEAST anonymous "Anonymous" member, Sondra Mary Horne Whatley aka "Rebel Child" and other bullshit names

So it was recently brought to my attention that Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst's imaginary friend has been making some more idle threats against me. After I got off the floor from the excessive chortles brought on by the newest idle threat (a Hashtag Operation [#OpDereksTears] at that! Yeah, good luck with trying to make me cry, unless tears of laughter count LOLOLOL.

I believe that Val's "friends" on her shitblog are indeed just Val pretending to be interested parties, but there is a small chance that Val's new retarded friend is longtime troll Sondra Mary Horne Whatley of Lowndesboro, AL, aka Rebel Child, aka Narcissistic Bitch, aka AnonKittieKat or whatever Twitter account she's had to make up next, since she doesn't last long on Twitter. 

So who is Sandra? She's an annoying wannabe vigilante that is such a wannabe even Encyclopedia Dramatica has a page on her. Yeah, even other online vigi scum have distanced themselves from her. 

So here is a summary of Sondra from the asshats at ED (I will summarize it here so you don't have to give traffic to that shit site):

  1. Sondra tried attaching herself to Petra Luna and even claimed Petra Luna was going to turn over control to Petra's one man army to her. It never happened because Petra Luna's army consisted of just Petra Luna. 
  2. After getting blackballed by Petra Loony, Sondra made a number of online accounts to convince people she had her own 'army.' But like Petra Loony, Sondra's army was also an army of one. These are among the many names she has used on Youtube (some names she reused later on Twitter): 
  3. ConstipatedDiahrea, DurtyAnna16 (pretending to be a kid), GracieLuvsPink, HijackingReality, HollaBackGirlllllll, HuddleHouse247, hugzzzzzzz4u, iDontGivaSchitt, iHearCrazyVoices, lLoveNerds,  JimbosBaconDelivery, KarenWaIker, LilMissMeatyAnon, LiPsOFaANGEL14, MadeaPieceBeSteele, MzWonderWoman2U, NarcissticBitch, notwhiiic, OMGwtfSTFUwhore, 0pticalillusion, paulacandance, PleaseMakeMeStop, RebelChiId, RodBurchFan, ShaNaNaRules, TakingBackMyBrave, teenytinylittleme, THELMAandLOUISEroll, VanillaLiceLiceBaby, ViolateMyself,WAFFLEHOUSE2000, Warrior0nAWarpath, WarrioronAWarpath, WavesOfReaction, xxRebelChildxx, yourMAwarnedUaboutME, FearTheCougars
  4. Sondra used her own 14 year old daughter as bait to try to lure alleged online predators. It seems to have failed miserably. 
  5. Sondra is 42  48 years old, and still lives at home with her daddy.
  6. Her father is a card-carrying member of the KKK. Srsly.
  7. Sondra is addicted to painkillers.
  8. Sondra once married a man strictly for money.
  9. Sondra's breasts were made possible by her divorce settlement.
  10. Her favorite saying is "I WON'T BACK DOWN!".
  11. Claims to have "modeled", but can only produce pics of other models.
  12. Has an identical twin sister, who stole her husband, merely by being "not Sondra".
  13. Claims to be a "Psych Social Worker" when, in fact, she's unemployed.
  14. Is frequently seen prowling the tubes for young male members of Anonymous.
  15. Believes members of Anonymous will protect her.
  16. When cornered, Sondra will threaten with lolsuits.
At some point, this stupid cunt has taken her circus to Twitter, so add @AnonKittieKat and @AnonBitchIsBack. Well she didn't stay back for long, because both accounts are suspended. One of her Anonymous comrades is THIS GUY,  a schmuck who is actually a fan of Hitler. I'm not surprised. I've stated elsewhere on this blog that the "Antis" often carry banners of hate for other groups. Stitches 77 was a Skinhead, Valerie Parkhurst claims she supports the Sons of the Confederacy and attacks minorities online regularly, and here an Anonymous member is a Hitler sympathizer. 

Sondra also claims to have been involved with both AZU and Acme Cleaning Services, and when she first contacted me a few months ago she mentioned a woman who hasn't been involved with the Anti-Registry Movement in half a decade. So perhaps this crazy twat took some time off. But it seems she has possibly made a drinking buddy with Valigaturd. Considering the mention of my Twitter page and her recent Twitter "crusade," I do reasonably suspect at least the one anonymous troll who mentioned my Twitter page is Sondra. Since Sondra and Vag are both gun-nuts, it seems at least plausible that two dumb old broads shunned by other so-called "Antis" would find solace in each other. 

Addendum: It seems I ruffled a few feathers. Seems to me I'm on the right trail. The fact that Val's imaginary friend responded so quickly to this article tells me that Val & her imaginary friends spend all day sitting on the internet waiting for me to post something. Here is the response that was written on Val's shitblog:

This is too funny! First, apparently they are already anticipating failure. Heh. I'm sure plans B, C, all the way to Z will be a failure too :)

Second, nothing they've done so far is 100% legal. Harassing folks is not legal. Just because they haven't been arrested for it yet doesn't mean they are legit. That's obviously a main reason most internet vigilante scumbags go to great lengths to hide their identities. The only reason Valerie Parkhurst hasn't spent time in an Ohio prison yet is there is no evidence she ever sent letters to my neighbors, something she claimed to have done. Obviously Val is full of shit because if she was telling the truth, she would have been jailed. Again.

Third, I didn't "dox" anyone douchemissile, I merely reposted some info from a shit site since apparently Sondra, like Val, isn't well liked even among online vigi scum fucks. Nor did I say I was 100% sure Val's imaginary friend is Sondra. However the M.O. certainly doesn't eliminate Sondra as a suspect. But even if it isn't, it will just be another loser with a shaky mental health history and possibly a criminal record.

Fourth, "de-anonymizing" yourself is exactly the point! You hide like a coward and don't have the testicular fortitude to meet me in person so you hide behind a computer screen. If you don't "de-anonymize" as you put it, then you still lost the challenge.

I will be awaiting those updates LOLOLOL. By the way, try something original this time. I've already been doxxed (pointless since I post my info online anyways), had dozens of hate sites devoted to me, gotten the 3am phone threats, and neighbors supposedly got letters about me. There isn't much let you CAN do at this point besides do what you always do, make idle threats.

Here is an idea, come see me in person. That's the one thing you HAVEN'T done! Later, losers!

Thursday, August 27, 2015

Valigator and her imaginary friends have made me wait forever for their big surprise, yet they consistently fail to deliver

This is a very short post. The only reason I am writing this here is because Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst and her imaginary friend on her shit blog have continued making idle threats against me, and I challenged them to meet me in person. Obviously Val and imaginary friend won't do it. 

I'd like to remind Valerie and her imaginary friend of a few facts:
  1. I've gotten the same lame threat for years. Supposedly I'm supposed to have gotten a "big surprise" of some sort since 2008. I'm STILL waiting for this big surprise. Glad I never held my breath on that one.  Well, the asshole was right about one thing, I'd "never see him coming"... because he was afraid to show up! LOL.
  2. Valigaturd claims she wrote my neighbors letters a couple of years ago and they were up in arms, but when I asked all my neighbors about these alleged letters, not one neighbor received anything. Proof or it never happened!
  3. Valigaturd tried to make people think she went to Tallahassee to see me "crash and burn" at the Rally in Tally, and claims she only saw "four people" there. Obviously she wasn't there nor can she count, and since my counter-rally got equal attention with the Lauren Book walk, to make the claim my rally was a failure is to admit the Lauren Book bash was a failure. 
  4. The only time I can actually say Valigaturd actually tried sabotaging an event (the 2012 RSOL Conference in Albuquerque), it backfired miserably
So once again, Valigaturd and her imaginary friend is once again making implicit threats they can't back up. I will challenge them like I challenged that random Twitter twat that trash-talked me the other day-- SAY IT TO MY FACE OR DON'T SAY IT AT ALL. 

I know they won't accept because Valigaturd and her imaginary friend won't dare meet me in person. I will take it a step further. If the asshole who has been making idle threats since 2008 meets me in person, I'll fucking retire from the cause once and for all! I'll delete Once Fallen and all the useful info I have given to thousands of registered citizens. 

So what do you say, punks? Want to shut me up? Meet me in person. That's all you have to do. No more "anonymous" messages. You know where I live, so as we used to say back in the day, nothing separates us but air and opportunity. 

It has been seven years so it is time to put up or shut up.

ADDENDUM: Well it seems Valigaturd's imaginary friend has vowed to start "hashtag OpDereksTears" on me. Yawn. At least this time they will be giving their failed operation a name. Only tears I'll be shedding is tears of laughter from laughing at Val and her imaginary friend's rage after failing once again! ROFLMAFAO!!!!

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Stinson Hunter, bloody British vigi-wanker, has officially played his swan song

Kieren "Stinson Hunter" Parsons is getting ready to "grow his hair out and get a job"
Another online vigilante douchebag has officially called it quits, or as Stimpy said, playing his "swan song." Kieren Parsons, aka, "Stinson Hunter"  has claimed 30 arrests of "paedophiles" in the UK (though there are obvious questions as to the validity of his claims), but apparently he isn't making a lot of money trolling people on the internet. Apparently people were pissed he was begging for money-- Stimpy claims it was to see his kid, while critics contend he is lying to just con people out of a quick buck. Personally, I'm inclined to agree with the critics. Here is one such critical argument

This guy is a complete con. He's had us all (donators included) fooled. Had he of been truthful, maybe people wouldn't have a reason to question what he's been doing. I looked up to the guy a lot. I mean how do we know what we've donated has actually gone to him seeing his kid when his kid was already at home with him? The guy has a past that isn't exactly squeaky clean not to mention calling people names through his twitter and instagram but not so brave to say anything on facebook when he was called out. Anyone who questioned where the money went (donators or not) got removed, comments deleted or blocked but will happily sit on twitter belittling folk and making idol threats like they're something he scraped off the bottom of his shoe. Even some of his own family members have commented about their concerns about his habits and lies. All this talk of 30 convictions in 6 years and only 10 of them were put behind bars says a lot when the rest have been living ruined lives because of his mistakes. What has he really done for us parents that we haven't done for our own kids? From the day and hour our kids were born, it's been "us" protecting them, not him. I have lost all respect for the kid! He needs to sort his life out and get a job. Both him and her. We've all had our struggles and more severe cases than this. He thinks he's worse off than the rest of the world. Begging is not the answer for his next hit!

After I posted the last article about Kieren "Stinson Hunter" Parsons, my message board was flooded with a couple dozen threatening or derogatory "anonymous" comments from either Parsons or one of his lackeys. Of course, I couldn't give two shits about this bloody wanker and he can go choke on an Irish banger for all I care (obviously he isn't going to cross the pond to beat my ass so I'm not worried about censoring my disdain for this piece of shit.) 

There are other similar comments so I'll just summarize what I've read from the flood of comments. Apparently, ol' Stimpy collected upwards of $30k from a kickstarter campaign (more specifically, 32,661 British Pounds, the equivalent of $51,044 USD) under the guise of making an independent documentary and yet a couple of weeks ago, he was begging for yet more money from the losers who watch his online shenanigans, this time under the guise of needing to see his son. People started asking legitimate questions about where all this money disappeared to and why he's asking for yet more money to see a kid that lives with him, and he was being very evasive, even downright nasty to those supporters asking questions. After all, if the equivalent of $50,000 or so isn't enough to make a film and have enough to make ends meet, then obviously something is amiss.

Apparently, after the barrage of questions from soon-to-be EX-supporters of this shady, unsavory online vigi-scum, Stimpy is packing up his toys and crying home to mommy. This bum is going to get a real job, presumably as a dirt farmer or night janitor. All I can say is good riddance to bad rubbish.

Stinson Hunter plans to "vanish" after online dispute over cash
15:22, 14 JULY 2015
Nuneaton paedophile-hunter now says he plans to move away from stings and setups

Stinson Hunter says he plans to “vanish” and have some time to himself after he was abused online for asking for money.

The 33-year-old paedophile hunter from Nuneaton made a desperate plea to his Facebook followers for a small amount of cash this week so he can go to Norfolk and visit his baby son.

And while he did receive enough money to make the trip he was also attacked by some Facebook followers who accused him of sponging.

Hunter, now living in Lancashire, told the Telegraph that the latest online fracas is “the final straw” and he is now planning to take a step back from his work.

“I’ve got something planned, a one-off event, in the future,” he said.

“That’s my swan song. After that I’m going to take some time for myself.

“I’m going to grow my hair, look for a job and just vanish for a bit. That’s the plan.

“That’s where I am. I just want to focus on doing stuff for myself for a bit. My Facebook will still be ticking over but it will change.”

Hunter, whose film won a Bafta earlier this year, drew a mixture of criticism and support from his Facebook followers when he asked for money to go and look after his son after his former partner Kirsty fell ill.

In an emotional post Kirsty then wrote that Hunter was struggling financially.

She wrote: “He puts on an incredibly brave face for the public and I don’t know how, I couldn’t manage to do it, behind that incredibly brave front is a broken man right now, he can barely even afford food let alone bills or to even see his own son.

“He battles with depression every single day and it saddens me so much that I can’t even help with it, I don’t want to see his tears or hear him cry anymore.

“All he needed was that little extra support from the public when he really needed it most, all he wanted was to see his little boy and to help me out.”

Hunter then wrote later on: “For over six years I have been trapping paedophiles and have achieved over 30 convictions.

“Not once have I ever been paid for this.

“The nature of my work and my profile make it virtually impossible to get a regular job, yes that was my decision but I stand by it.”

Speaking to the Telegraph he added: “I’m not on benefits. I could claim Job Seekers Allowance but I don’t – I choose not to.

“If people saw my outgoings they would be surprised. I do my best to manage each month.

“But I’m sitting here right now selling my stuff off on eBay so I’m not going to be homeless in three months' time.

“I went to London recently and that 10-minute speech cost £300.

“I’m going to seal myself off now and take some time to get my life in order. That’s the main thing, to have time for me and my son.”

Hunter said that he did manage to raise £200 to pay for train tickets and a small amount more which he plans to put towards getting his driving licence and a car.

On Facebook he wrote that he was keen to go into education and go “beyond the stings and setups”.

“Nothing lasts forever,” he added.

As an aside, a guy who hit Stimpy with a car got his sentenced reduced. Hell, the guy should have gotten a medal for running over this POS. 

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

The "No Peace For Predators Florida! Protect Our Children!" Facebook group obviously has a problem with balls

Apparently there is a "branch" of the retarded No Peace For Predators group, and this branch may even be dumber than the original No Peace For Predators. This group is called "No Peace For Predators Florida! Protect Our Children!

Here is a prime example of their stupidity. Apparently there is a book on called, "Do You Want To Play With My Balls"? It is a crude adult humor book full of double entendres about "balls" (here is a YouTube reading of it, if you are curious). Kid's book parodies are nothing new (the most well-known at this time is probably "Go The Fuck To Sleep," with the audio version read by Samuel L. Jackson) but apparently this humor book did not elicit any laughs from the idiots at NPFP-FloriDUH. 

So one of the regular posters made a Facebook post about this book to "warn" others of this book. Another member responded, "The author and the publishing company should be sued for such non sense. In fact I think I will contact my lawyer in behalf of all our children." Another said, "I can't comprehend why people think it's ok to do or expose such perverted things and think there will be no later consequences." Still another said, "as an adult with more experience it's obvious the meanings of the book and as a survior (sic) of molestation of 18+ guys, I'm incredibly offended by this book and the use of the little girl." "It should be plainly posted as adult only. Further more it should be band from being published. Only sick minded people find it amusing. Hince the point of this site." And, "What a horrible book! No WAY this was written without malice. I better NEVER see this in a children's library section or the please be quiet rule will not be followed! Disturbed freaks of nature."

It should be noted the attorney they contacted told them, as relayed by one member of NPFP-FloriDUH, "it would[n't] be prudent to try and sue the writer or the publishing company due to freedom of speech laws. And freedom to publish ones opinion. As bad as it may be there are far worse things published under those laws." [Screenshot of this exchange will be posted st the end of the article due to length. 

If that wasn't enough, the members flooded the Amazon page with negative reviews. Here are a few of their crazy reviews:

0 of 2 people found the following review helpful
1Though the "humor" in this book may have been intended for adults, it still endangers children
ByMichael Welperon June 19, 2015
Format: Hardcover
It is wrong to present this material in the format of a children's book. I understand that this book was written for adults, but that doesn't mean that it couldn't end up in the hands of a child. Children deserve to be protected. No moral adult would ever present such disgusting material in a way that could potentially appeal to an innocent child. And more seriously--yes, I do understand that this book was not intended to aid pedophiles, but a very sick adult could take advantage of the opportunity it yields, nonetheless.

0 of 5 people found the following review helpful
1i wish i could give this horrible book less then 1 star
ByTamaraon June 14, 2015
Format: Kindle Edition
i wish i could give this horrible book less then 1 star. It s so disgusting i would neve ever read this to my kids. who wrote this book must have been a pedophile

1 of 6 people found the following review helpful
1Not a child's book - read it on youtube before you buy...
ByPro-Life Nobamaon June 7, 2015
Format: Kindle Edition
NOT A CHILDREN'S BOOK. Not sure what adult would write this or why (pedophile, gay activist or just a gag). Go hear it read at Youtube and decide for yourself.

Out of all the retarded comments, the comment below is the dumbest comment of all:

1 of 7 people found the following review helpful
1Pornography for 2 year olds
ByVivian Aldanaon June 6, 2015
Format: Kindle Edition
This is in NO WAY an innocent book. Do You Want to Play With My Balls is a manual for pedophiles. Perhaps some INNOCENT PERVERT will read it to your child. They can inform your child or grandchild about Blue balls, licking balls, holding a persons ball sack, hairy balls, or squeezing a persons balls, ???? Innocent--Really???? NO, not innocent--IT IS PERVERTED! It is pornography for 2-year olds.

Perhaps we should sent the morons at this branch of NPFP a care package. Maybe some of Chef's Chocolate Salty Balls? Maybe a case of Ben & Jerry's Schweddy Balls? How about an LP of AC/DC's "Big Balls"? Or, perhaps the complete works of Honore de BALZAC?

Apparently this will be the next book on NPFP-FL's shitlist
Actually, instead of balls, we need to send everyone at "No Peace For Predators Florida! Protect Our Children!" a case of BRAINS. 

Monday, June 22, 2015

Valerie Parkhurst is "a different kind of predator"

Once again, Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst, career criminal now residing in Ft. Lauderdale FL, has been caught in a lie and completely embarrassed and humiliated. 

So here is the latest "Valigator PWNED" story -- A friend has written a new book, a true crime book entitled "Lost Youth: A True Story." [From the website: "Amazon bestselling Author Shaun Webb’s sixth full-length work, and second true crime study, Lost Youth: A True Story, delves into a fateful October 1981 night in Waterford, Michigan that rocked a quiet family’s peace and shook an entire community to its deepest emotional depth. Colette Molyneaux, 13, a cute, healthy and happy teenager, paid the ultimate price in a criminal’s horrible thirst for blood.  Nancy Molyneaux, Colette’s mother, also suffered enormously, enduring the violent act of rape on top of losing a dear daughter. Who was responsible for these monstrous crimes?  Why did such a bright light and friendly young lady have to be extinguished so brutally?  More to the point; what factors could have possibly contributed to the awful situation?"]

I have a copy and it will be my travel book as I prepare to travel to another public demonstration. 

In the meantime, those with a head start in reading the book has already posted reviews. One review was fairly critical of Shaun's book, so Valigator thought she would use that opportunity to start talking trash. Val responds to the critical review trashing the author and claiming that spoke with the critical reviewer (Val claims the critical reviewer called him a "jerk.") I found the comment and responded to Val and informed the author of what Val claimed. The reviewer was also notified of this claim. Val responded to my comment to making a claim that I am gay (which is odd considering Val once told an online poster she was a lesbian). 

The author of the critical review posted a response to Val's claims that she was contacted by Val. She stated she "do[es] not appreciate people highjacking my review for their own agenda. Nor do I appreciate mr. Webb being told I've had a conversation with anyone when all you did was comment on this post."

She follows up by saying, "In my mind that shows your are a different kind of predator."

Within a couple of hours, Valerie Drunkhurst deleted her comments and went into hiding (I'm sure once she restocks on "liquid courage," she'll be back to her usual bullshit. It is fun, however, to see Val caught in a lie and run for the hills, proving once again Val is a bullshit artist. 

Sadly, I was not home to screenshoot the exchange before Val deleted her shitty comments. However you can see the other comments on Amazon. 

Val--[This comment was deleted by the author on June 20, 2015]

Valigator is Valerie Parkhurst, a career criminal residing in Ft. Lauderdale, FL. She has multiple arrests for aggravated assault and gun violations, a fact easily verified by visiting the Broward Co. FL Clerk of Courts website. She has been harassing Mr. Webb for years and already had her account flagged for her barrage of attacks. Reader beware.

Val--[This comment was deleted by the author on June 20, 2015]

I know mr. Webb and have already been informed. I do not appreciate people highjacking my review for their own agenda. Nor do I appreciate mr. Webb being told I've had a conversation with anyone when all you did was comment on this post. In my mind that shows your are a different kind of predator.

Hey Val. Where'd you go? Not fun getting caught in your lie is it? So ashamed that you erased your comments. You're nearly 70 Val. ..act like your age!

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Three vigilante thugs try to burn down apartment building to go after registrant, kills elderly woman instead

Here are three more of Valerie Parkhurst's "heroes," burning down an entire apartment building just to go after a sex offender.

2 suspects go to Troy in fatal arson
2 waive extradition, 3rd to have hearing in North Carolina
By Kenneth C. Crowe II
Updated 9:45 pm, Monday, June 8, 2015
Val's Hero #1: Abbey Slaga

Two of the three suspects in the fatal May 1 arson have waived extradition from North Carolina while the third will have a hearing next week on returning to Troy, a spokesman for Rensselaer County District Attorney Joel Abelove said Monday.

The three are charged with first-degree arson for allegedly setting the fire, which authorities now believe caused the death of Gladys Halpin, 82.

Halpin was rescued from the 520 Second Ave. apartment building fire, during which she suffered a heart attack. Firefighters were able to revive her and get her to the hospital. She died May 23 at Bay State General Hospital in Massachusetts. Final autopsy results have not yet been released.

On Sunday, David Stanley, 22, of East Greenbush, was arraigned in City Court and sent to the jail without bail, police spokesman Capt. Daniel DeWolf said. He had previously waived extradition in North Carolina before being brought to Troy.

On Monday, Tyler Smith, 24, formerly of Castleton, waived his extradition at a hearing in Raleigh, N.C., and will be back in Troy by the end of the week, said Jonathan Desso, a spokesman for Abelove.

Abby Slaga, 21, of East Greenbush, did not waive extradition because she wanted to consult with an attorney, Desso said. Slaga's hearing will be June 16 in Franklin County, N.C. She will continue to be held on a fugitive from justice warrant in the Franklin County Jail without bail.

Stanley, Slaga and Smith were arrested last week by Raleigh police and Franklin County deputies on fugitive warrants issued in Troy. City detectives took part in the arrests.
Val's hero #2: Tyler Smith

DeWolf said detectives would return to Raleigh to bring back Smith.

According to Stanley's arrest report and criminal complaint, at least two people have given statements to police about what they saw and heard that night.

Those witnesses said Monday that the three defendants and a man who lived on the second floor of 520 Second Ave. had a feud over money that was apparently stolen from the tenant.

"They spray painted 'Rapo' on his door and on the building," said one witness who did not want his name used. "He was a Level 1 sex offender, we were told, but it sounded to me like they were arguing over money. I could smell the gasoline they used to set the fire outside his door."

The target of the flames was convicted of a sex crime in 2004, officials said.

Another witness said she had just come home from work that night and heard the argument and went to see what was going on.

"Then I saw the whole building just go 'boom' and saw the three people run out the door, one on fire. I then rushed around to make sure everyone was getting out."

Smith had been out of state prison for just a week before he allegedly took part in setting the fatal fire, according to authorities and New York state inmate records. He had been in prison for attempted burglary in Rensselaer County.

The three fled to the home in North Carolina of a relative of one of the suspects.

Officials said all three were friends and Slaga was involved in a romantic relationship with one of the men, but they did not specify which one.

Officials declined to say how the fire was set.

A video from the night of the fire appeared to show three people fleeing the building at 520 Second Ave.

The fire spread to neighboring 518 Second Ave. next door. Both buildings were heavily damaged and are now boarded up.

The investigation continues, and authorities have not ruled out additional charges.

The May 1 fire has not been linked to an earlier string of 13 fires set in Lansingburgh between July 2014 and February 2015, police said.

Thursday, May 21, 2015

Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst gets called out for her lack of reading comprehension, then she plays fast and loose with the truth

Valerie Parkhurst aka Valigator, the career criminal now residing in Ft. Lauderdale, FL, is at it again. Earlier this year, AZUnites exposed Val's fraudulent GoFundMe campaign, as well as highlighted her admittance of using confirmation bias in her articles. 

Now, Val has continued the latest campaign of character assassination on her poorly designed, unreadable blog. 

In Valerie Parkhurst's personal obsession with me, she stumbled upon a Master's thesis written in 2011 and posted on the Kansas university scholarly works website. I never knew it existed, personally, but unlike Parkhurst, I'm not so obsessed with Derek Logue, I feel the need to constantly Google myself to see what people are writing about me. Val has a penchant for posting on comments Anti-Registry Movement activists have made as far back as 2009 in an attempt to start a fight. I guess she does not realize that rarely does one read comment sections of articles older than three days, so this strategy of hers does little but waste her time. But if she thinks leaving her droppings on a comment board from 2009 is the way to attack us, more power to her, I guess. 

This will be the only time anyone actually reads shit from her blog. 
So anyways, Val posted this 2011 thesis and proclaimed, "Seems this researcher put Derek Logue (like the bug he is) under glass and had not so glowing reviews about this freak. Funny thing after all these years, Derek doesn't link (anywhere) to this observation about him.."

Master's Theses are rarely published publicly, and when they are, they are not easily found, nor do researchers tend to notify people they are citing works beforehand. The researcher obviously obtained a copy of the Once Fallen eBook as part of his research. Thus, I was never aware of the research paper.

Somehow Valerie Parkhurst thought the article was attacking me much to her delight but the actual article was actually a discussion about how the myths of the American sex offender has negatively impacted the ability of the scientific community to effectively study strategies for reducing sexual abuse. The abstract of the article states the following: 

Sex offenders are the subjects of a discourse suggesting that they are “brutish, disgusting, primitive freaks” who are destined for recidivism. This discourse has provided the rationale for myriad laws designed to control sex offenders. However, these well-intentioned laws create negative outcomes for both sex offenders and society. This paper examines dominant sex offender discourse and discusses evidence that contradicts the prevailing assumptions about sex offenders. In so doing, it questions the efficacy and benefit of current sex offender laws and suggests alternative ways the U.S. can address the problem of child sexual abuse. -- p. iii

In regards to Gray's discussion of Once Fallen, I've included every instance below where Derek Logue/ Once Fallen is discussed in his research paper, entitled, "DEVIANCE AND DISCOURSE: CHILD MOLESTERS IN THE UNITED STATES" -- 

"Derek Logue operates a Web site called that advocates for sex offender rights and legislation reform, as well as provides resources for sex offenders after they have been released from incarceration. Derek Logue has also self-published a book about his crime. It is appropriate to use his real name because he is a public figure and his status as a sex offender is public knowledge. Derek’s inclusion in this essay will not reveal any information not already available from other sources." -- p. 11

"Derek Logue, a sex offender who became an activist for sex offender rights, says that sex offenders experience more physical harassment than suggested by Levenson and Cotter’s study. Logue’s assertion is anecdotal, but it is based on his personal experience and activism on behalf of sex offender rights. He argues that offenders are reluctant to report physical altercations out of fear police will blame them for instigating the fight. Logue also points out that sex offenders prefer to “fly under the radar” and avoid unnecessary dealings with law enforcement. It is difficult to judge the validity of Logue’s assertion based on Levenson and Cotter’s study, as the researchers were not affiliated with law enforcement. However, since the study was conducted in court-mandated counseling sessions, it is possible that the offenders worried that their interviews could eventually come to the attention of law enforcement. At least some people express a willingness to harm sex offenders, so it is possible Derek is correct." -- p. 37

"The social isolation, loss of civic identity, and lack of hope is thought to contribute to the risk of recidivism in sex offenders (Robbers 2009:11). Derek Logue expressed the same sentiment during my interview with him. He also wrote about it in his book Once Fallen (Logue 2009:4): “This label [registered sex offender] carries with it a ‘social death sentence’; sex offenders are considered the scourge of society, deserving of death, castration, concentration camps, and torture.” There are not any legal provisions allowing for the torture of sex offenders. Logue is reflecting his personal experience as a sex offender, which seems like civil or social torture to him. His past interferes with his current life. Finding gainful employment was a challenge: “During the next couple of months, I would face rejection after rejection after rejection. I tried offices, manual labor jobs, even fast food, to no avail.” (Logue 2009:24). He cannot live with his girlfriend or spend the night at her house because she has a minor son. (This may seem to be a common sense restriction, but Logue’s crime was against a female. Child molesters often have gender preferences.) Logue has even considered suicide." -- p. 42-43

This is hardly an attack on Derek Logue or Once Fallen, much less against the Anti-Registry Movement in general. In fact, Grey concludes that while he feels most existing laws should still be used to some extent (except residency restrictions) the laws should not apply to all offenders, and serious reforms need to be made to the dialogue regarding sex offender conversations. 

"If lawmakers and officials begin to counter the child molester rhetoric, some of the problems associated with sex offender laws might be alleviated." -- p. 77

"Not only must lawmakers and officials work to change the tone of the conversation about sex offenders, they must acknowledge that the legal system is overwhelmed with the requirements of sex offender control." -- p. 80

"There are alternative strategies for treating sex offenders with low-risk profiles and managing them in the community." -- p. 81

"Whatever reforms are implemented, the way forward will require courageous lawmakers to lead sober conversations that replace “tough on crime” rhetoric with honest evaluations of the effectiveness and essential fairness of the nation’s sex offender laws. A just society cannot tolerate the legal creation of a persistent underclass. Unfortunately, none of the current or recommended strategies prevents molestations in the first place. This remains a difficult area to address. It is impossible to remove risk entirely from children’s lives. My informant, Marshall, has a realistic perspective on the problem: “But I don’t know how effective the laws are in preventing what it is that they want to prevent. I think that the best prevention is good parenting. At the same time, you just can’t prevent some things." -- p. 82 

So now that I happily pointed out to Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst her error, she cranked up her BS meter to a higher level. She added an addendum to her shit-post, claiming, "Seems to Derek, he thinks this paper is an affirmation of his worthless positions and accuses me of interpreting it incorrectly. I personally think the guy is a hack, but his description of Logue and his background (""Additionally, one out of three victims who became abusers (Logue) had a history of being cruel to animals in their childhoods"""" (Bouvier 2003:446)."

So NOW Val thinks the researcher is a "hack" now that I made her realize that he is in favor of sex offender reforms. Not only that, but Val felt the need to play fast and loose with the written word by ADDING words into the article to make it sound like the researcher is attacking me. 

The actual article that Val claims is attacking me says this:

With a screenshot for added measure
"Though the mechanism that links past molestation with future crime is poorly understood, the study found that other factors in the victim’s history—like poor adult supervision, violence at home, or being abused by a female—were correlated with an increased risk of becoming an abuser. Additionally, one out of three victims who became abusers had a history of being cruel to animals in their childhoods (Bouvier 2003:446)." -- p. 15

Nowhere does the article associate that statement with Derek Logue/ Once Fallen. Val felt that if she added that one word in there to associate me with with a random statement she can somehow salvage the lie she stated by posting this research paper rather than admit that she does not know how to read a college-level report. 

Misreading advanced reading material is something Valerie Parkhurst tends to do on a consistent basis. In fact, I recently called her out on another bogus claim she made on her blog:

Not only did she credit the bogus 52% study to the wrong guy, she took it a step further by posting THE WRONG REPORT on her shit-blog. 

Apparently, when Valerie Parkhurst stated back on her shit-blog on January 4, 2015, "But I, as usual, look for data/opinions/conclusions that re-enforces my position on the issue and as predictable isnt (sic) hard to find," apparently she was lying about these studies being hard to find. But why point out the truth when you can just made things up and post it online, as Parkhurst and her online cohorts has been prone to do? After all, many people don't want to read an 82-page article, they want the Cliff Notes version. 

If Val ever decides to sell a 'Val's Notes" you better demand a refund. 

That pesky confirmation bias. 

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Man behind Facebook page that named and shamed child sex offenders has a string of indecency convictions himself

Anytime I come across an online hate page on Facebook, I can't help but to wonder how many of them have criminal records (we all know David Rowe from No Peace For Predators has a record, as does Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst). 

Here is another hypocrite running another anti-Registrant FB page.

Man behind Facebook page that named and shamed child sex offenders has a string of indecency convictions himself

A self-appointed moral guardian who set up a Facebook page to name and shame convicted child sex offenders has a string of convictions for indecency himself.

'Paedophile hunter' Joseph McCloskey (39) has been exposed as a career criminal with a total of 96 previous convictions, including four for indecency, as well as a host of others for drugs - including supplying Class A drugs - public order and road traffic offences.

The Limavady man's 23-year criminal career emerged yesterday when he appeared at Londonderry Magistrates Court charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm in the city centre on September 20 last year. He pleaded guilty to the assault and was released on bail, and will be sentenced on June 12.

McCloskey's record of offending averages four convictions a year.

He was at the centre of a legal storm earlier this year when he and social media giant Facebook were successfully sued by a sex offender who had been identified on a page, Keeping Our Kids Safe From Predators 2, operated by McCloskey.

The courtroom victory provoked a storm of outrage on McCloskey's behalf after the exposed paedophile was awarded damages. Mr Justice Stephens said that McCloskey's Facebook site "was an attempt to hunt a sex offender, to drive him from his home and to expose him to vilification".

The child abuser, identified in court only as 'CG', claimed harassment, violation of his right to privacy and breaches of the Data Protection Act against Facebook and McCloskey after his photograph and details appeared on the site in 2013.

A string of abusive comments and information on his location appeared. One user called for CG to be hanged, while others advocated shooting or castrating him.

One of the posts stated: "I would tie him to a tree and put a blowtorch where he wouldn't want it."

The abuser claimed his fear of violence being inflicted on him was heightened by one of those posting on the page being a former UDA commander who forced him to flee in a past attack on his home.

In evidence, CG also claimed he has been threatened with being thrown off a pier during a fishing trip, hounded out of a cinema and had to use a supermarket trolley to fight off another tormentor.

"He (McCloskey) took pride in driving an individual out of his home," Mr Justice Stephens said, and "knowingly encourages harassment of sex offenders by other individuals by the comments he makes and by the aim and purpose of the profile/page."

Both Facebook and Mr McCloskey were held liable for misuse of private information, with a further finding against the page operator for unlawful harassment.

The judge awarded £20,000 damages against McCloskey and Facebook, with McCloskey being liable for £15,000 of that sum.

Both McCloskey and Facebook are appealing against the ruling.In a further twist, the child abuser who successfully sued McCloskey and Facebook was himself then sued by two of his victims in a bid to secure compensation for abuse they suffered.

The abuse victims' lawyers secured a High Court injunction halting any payout to the sex offender following his landmark action against the social networking giant.

Lawyer Michael Redmond, of Doris & MacMahon Solicitors, acted for one of the victims.

He said: "Our client was extremely concerned and annoyed on hearing that the person who had been convicted of abuse was due to receive a significant amount of compensation."

Experts say it's almost impossible to check the bona fides of anyone operating a Facebook page,.

According to social media expert Dr Kevin Curran, Reader in Computer Science at Ulster University, there is nothing to stop anyone setting themselves up as an online vigilante on Facebook - no matter how shady their past.

"It's an open door, really," Dr Curran said. "A Facebook page can be set up by anyone at all. There are no barriers."

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

If these online vigilante groups are "heroes," then why do they have to host their operations overseas

Here is a thought I've had before. It is obviously okay in America for people to harass Registered Citizens, as message boards are filled with the same tired comments.

But over the years, members of online vigilante douchebag groups like AZU have often posted their shit overseas because websites like Youtube actually have some degree of standards and it is possible to have hateful videos removed (although Facebook allows far more hate groups to routinely post murder discussions on their websites). Now, given the fact that it pretty much takes a court order to have anything removed from various websites, and given the acceptance of harassing and slandering registered citizens online, it is obvious that so-called "Antis" need to send their trash overseas because even the average American doesn't want to deal with them.

The bad news for those who have been negatively impacted by "Evil-Unveiled" are being victimized again because the defunct Evil-Unveiled info, already a project plagiarized from the earlier Perverted-Justice trash project Wikisposure, has now been reposted on another garbage site called "Encyclopedia Dramatica," another internet filth site run by internet trolls and other assorted  losers.

Now, while Encyclopedia Dramatica is not a site to be taken seriously by any means (it is a site created "for the lulz" meaning its only purpose is to make fun of and hurt people), some assholes at ED have decided to "archive" the Wikisposure/Evil-Unveiled tripe "as part of a lulz preservation project," as the cowards at ED proclaim.

Encyclopedia Dramatica is hosted overseas of course, and claim to be under Ukrainian jurisdiction, though having the .se extension. ED has a pretty shitty reputation, and they are pretty hypocritical considering they are re-posting and promoting the inaccurate Evil-Unveiled website and yet they are promoting rape and molestation:

This is actually quite typical of internet troll groups. After all, I've covered the hypocrisy often on this website. I wouldn't doubt many current members of ED are actual sex offenders like T-Sand.

Of course, that means little to the dozens of Anti-Registry Movement reformists who have been continuously slandered by the lies started by Perverted Justice and continue to spread like a disease. And there is little that can be done about it except to consider the source. Encyclopedia Dramatica isn't exactly a site known for accurate info. In fact, they freely admit their site isn't about the facts.

I doubt there IS much any of you impacted by having this info can do, save gong to court in a foreign nation, but perhaps you can file a suit against the the big search engines, especially Google, to have the links buried. Maybe someday, I'll catch one of these trolls in person. You'd be amazed how weak these people are in real life, just like the typical bully.

But, obviously even the trolls know that they are doing something wrong, because they go to great lengths to conceal their identities and posting their harassment outside the reach of American courts. There is nothing heroic about that.

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

Exposing a couple of "Shoalanda Speaks" members

A few years ago, I was targeted and threatened by the anonymous scum from a trashy Alabama blog called 'Shoalanda Speaks." It seems their obsession with me hasn't stopped long after I moved to Ohio, as they continue to blog about me. And now, one of the douchebags who works at the blog attacked me on a recent OpEd I was featured in at (of course, career criminal Valerie Parkhurst was there too but that's par for the course). 

One of my favorite things to do is exposing online scum like the ones who work at Shoalanda Speaks. They have been mostly anonymous but every now and then, they slip up. 

(By the way, for those unaware of what a "Shoalanda" is, there is a local interest blog in Muscle Shoals, AL called "Shoalanda Speaks," run by a few gossipy losers with nothing better to do than complain about how much the Shoals area sucks. In other words, just another group of anonymous cowards afraid to show their faces online, so they fit in with the rest of the scum I feature on this blog.) 

Apparently, Kathryn Sperry-Wheeler created an account just to attack me, but added her Facebook page to her account. I guess she must have thought I wasn't going to think to click the link, but I did.  Interestingly enough, she also participates in a Facebook page called "Larry Stutts is a quack." This is the same Senator who is pushing SB 272, a bad bill that could allow for really young kids to land on the registry. Texas registers 10 year old kids, so I guess Alabama wants to play, "Me too!" Gee, I wonder if she'll support the senator on this bill? What an idiot!

And, Kathryn made a new account just to attack me. LOL!
Speaking of idiots, Ed Truitt was already exposed as part of the Shoalanda Speaks out of her ass blog. I just never got around to mentioning him until now. He's been in hiding as of late after someone at the old Times Daily site exposed his identity. I wonder how he felt upon discovering that his contact Clay "T-Sand" Keys was busted for CP in Pensacola? It must have been embarrassing for the Shoalanda Speaks blog, knowing they aligned themselves with a criminal recidivist just to attack someone who has not been rearrested. 

Shoalanda speaks of vigilante violence. 

The reason I haven't forgotten Trollanda and fiends isn't even personal. It is because of stuff like the above post. People like Kathryn and Ed and Valerie are the TRUE monsters. They project their hatred to a socially accepted target to feel better about their miserable lives. I'm curious how many criminals besides T-Sand Shoalanda has worked with over the years? 

Someday, when I have nothing important to do, I may take the time to expose the identities of every member of Shoalanda Speaks. In the meantime, I have a bill to kill and a Rally in Tally. Later!

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Meri Jane McCracken-Woods, convicted of downloading CP to frame husband, threatens to "prosecute" Once Fallen over publicly posted photo

Meri Jane McCracken-Woods, convicted in 2014 of downloading CP
UPDATE: I made a few minor corrections, as I was not given the above photo directly, I was given a link to Meri's page, which has the photo posted on her profile. Maybe in the future, Meri and her "attorney" will remember that posting pics on public social media pages do not make them "private."

Since 2008, Once Fallen has maintained two blogs about exposing trolls, vigilantes, and others who abuse sex offender issues for personal gain. AZ-Unites is one of them. The annual Shiitake Awards is the other blog.

I'm sure most regular readers of AZUnites is familiar with the Shiitake Awards, but for those who are not familiar, the Shiitake Awards is an annual Razzie-Awards-styled project where we vote on the dumbest sex ofender-related story of the year. There are seven categories, and one of the categories is "Everyday Zeroes," the category for everyday citizens who make headlines for doing something stupid related to sex offenders. Most of the time, it is a direct vigilante action, such as a guy harassing a registered person. However, there are times where people have been featured on the Shiitake Awards for trying to set people up for sex crimes.

INDIANA, Pa. - A Pennsylvania woman convicted of downloading child pornography to frame her estranged husband must spend six months to two years in the county jail.

The Indiana (Pa.) Gazette reports 43-year-old Meri Jane Woods was sentenced Monday by an Indiana County judge who rejected her attorney's request for leniency and flexibility and to postpone the sentence until after the holidays.

A jury previously found Woods downloaded 40 images to the family computer, took it to police in August 2013 and blamed her estranged husband, Matthew Woods, for the material.

But when police examined time stamps, they determined the images had been downloaded more than two weeks after Meri Woods had her husband kicked out of their Clymer-area home with a protection-from-abuse order.

Woods continues to deny wrongdoing saying, "I only wanted to protect my children."

Last year, one of the Everyday Zeroes awards nominees is a woman from Clymer, PA named Meri Jane Woods (nee McCracken), who was convicted in December of downloading child pornography in an attempt to frame her husband for a sex crime. She is supposed to be serving a six-months to two-year sentence right now, but if the phone call I received is to be believed, she's out on bail pending an appeal.

No matter how she spins the facts, she's currently convicted of a sex crime. There was no word on whether we will see her on the public registry, but in the interest of fairness, people are on the registry for far less than downloading 40 images of child pornography.

So what does this have to do with AZUnites? Well let me explain. Yesterday morning, I received a call from an unknown phone number. The woman on the phone asks for the CEO of Once Fallen or something like that. Well, as the only worker of Once Fallen, I'm not only the president, I'm also a client. At any rate, this woman claims to be an attorney with some official sounding name (probably the infamous law office of Canwe, Cheatem, and Howe) and is allegedly representing Meri Jane Woods. She tells me Meri is on appeal and she wants my picture taken down because it is "private" and "only her husband" has a copy of said photo.

Ok, what people don't seem to realize is when you are married to someone and you give pictures to your husband, your husband owns the pictures as well. It is a moot point because after I had posted Meri's story on the Shiitake-Worthy Blog, someone emailed me and told me a picture of Meri could be found on, so I downloaded the pic above and posted on my blog. So, this "attorney's" claim that this photo was private and given to me by her husband was a truckload of bovine excrement.

I thought it was unfair that Meri's photo was not being plastered all over the news, because if her scheme worked and her husband was arrested for CP, his face would have been plastered on every news station for Bangor to Honolulu. This, in the interest of fairness, I became the first to release a photo of Meri Jane Woods from Clymer PA, convicted in December 2014 of downloading child pornography.

Meri's official mugshot is finally online,
took long enough. 
So this "attorney' claims if I don't take down the photo, I will be "prosecuted." For an attorney, she's not very bright. How can I be "prosecuted" for publishing a photo? Maybe she meant sued but an attorney should know the difference between lawsuit and prosecution. Well, if I get sued, good luck collecting. What is she going to collect? My 5 year old laptop that doesn't work half the time? Maybe my trilobite fossil, or my Jesus prison wall art. Maybe my Cincinnati Reds wall clock, or my Adidas sneakers. What a joke! Good luck with that lawsuit, but I hope you are willing to travel to Ohio to do so.

Whatever the case may be, if I do face some sort of litigation, the law is on my side. I merely published a photo for informational purposes. After all, people have a "right to know" if a convicted sex offender lives in the neighborhood, right? Downloading CP is a sex crime, after all.  Meri Jane Woods is on the public registry now.I guess the state police will be "prosecuted" for publishing her photo, too?

I'm no fan of the registry by any means. On the other hand, I'm no fan of a woman trying to set her husband up for a sex crime out of revenge for whatever reason they decided to split. Threatening a nationally known sex offender reform advocate isn't going to win you any friends, either, Meri and friends.

Expect to see her ugly face on the Idiots Registry sometime soon as well.

Or perhaps the Investigation Discovery channel will re-air the March 30th 2015 episode of "Who the [bleep] did I marry?" The episode entitled "Evil Beauty" features Meri Woods.

I will post any updates to this development to this story as it arrives.

Sunday, March 22, 2015

Is the UK's self-styled "Paedo Hunter" Stinson Hunter bullying kids online?

This was shared with me recently from an anonymous individual. It is a lengthy article, and it isn't for the faint of heart. You don't have to agree with everything written here but it is presented verbatim/ unedited for the sake of authenticity.

The author of this post has written an accusation that Kieran Parsons, aka "Stinson Hunter," the PJ copycat working out of England, is harassing and bullying underage persons online. This piece also discusses Cynthia Harvey, another person posted on this blog, as an example of how online vigilantes are often involved in online bullying campaigns.

Link to source --

Stinson: 'Pedo Hunter' Causes Kids Grief for Fun
Posted by Bernie Najarian on 2015-March-19 15:35:33, Thursday 

Stinson Hunter is a man who named himself for his vocation – hunting pedophiles.  

He was born Kieren Parsons in 1981, but in his 17th year he damaged his brand severely by burning down a school.  No one was in the building at the time, luckily, but Hunter, who says “I wasn’t a nice person,” served 10 years in prison.  In 2014, the then 32-year-old husband and father told Sam Dimmer of the Coventry Telegraph (1), 

“It happened 16 years ago. I have said all along I want to right the wrongs I have done. What I’m doing now I’m doing for the right reasons.”
[end quote]

Hunter legally changed his name to publicize his new start.  What he is ‘doing now,’ consistent with that name, can be spun as acting as an unpaid adjunct to law enforcement. Or it can be spun as working as a professional vigilante and showman.  His modus operandi is to lurk on online websites where people hook up for sexual encounters.  He posts a profile masking himself as a girl whose age is as low as he can get away with under the website’s conditions.  Then, when he makes contact with a potential sex partner, he informs the person that he is younger than the legal age (16).  If the person keeps talking to him, everything is recorded.  He attempts to arrange a sexual meeting, and once a date is set, proceeds to meet his target with cameras and a crew.  The resulting videos are posted on Youtube, Facebook and his own website, and tweeted out repeatedly on Twitter.  He has brought to the U.K. an old American theme, an amateur version of Chris Hansen’s NBC-TV-sponsored ‘To Catch a Predator’ or Xavier von Erck’s web-based ‘Perverted Justice,’ but he has added a modern, Youtuber flare.  He appears cloaked in tattoos and lightly stubbled, like a council-flat Marilyn Manson, a television star for the age of child abuse retribution.  

What drives him?  Was he ever sexually abused?  Not as far as we know, though he claims some sort of abuse in a children’s home – but, of course, when it comes to being outraged about abuse, everyone reads the news.  And Hunter is a new dad.  Just as one might clear a new flat of bedbugs before moving in, why not do some hygiene, redeeming and employing oneself at the same time, by eradicating some pedophiles from his child’s new global playpen?  He wants to do right this time.  And much of his society believes in him now.  Old youthful sex offenders may never be reliably reformed, in the popular view, but this old arsonist surely is.  A Bafta-award-winning director, Dan Reed, loaned his skills to Hunter to produce a documentary on his efforts for British television’s Channel 4.  Called ‘The Paedophile Hunter,’ it lauded his efforts while confronting some of the controversies involved.  According to The Independent’s Jess Denham in Oct. 2014 (2), 

“One man, Mark (perhaps actually Michael Parkes – BN) (3), killed himself shortly after being confronted by Hunter as he arrived to meet a (hypothetical – BN) 12-year-old girl. 

His partner and mother of his young child tells cameras she sympathises with Hunter's crime-stopping intentions, but disagrees with footage being published for his 250,000 Facebook followers to see. 

"He claims he is protecting children but what about my child, a real child who is going to grow up without a dad?" she says.

While many Twitter users agreed with Mark's partner and argued that catching criminals should be left to the police, others praised Hunter's 'hands on' approach to stopping those with paedophilic predilections.”

[end quote]

Hunter is surrounded on Youtube and Facebook with a claque of vociferous, triumphal supporters.  On March 18, 2015, their support was crowned with prestigious, official approval when ‘The Paedophile Hunter’ won the Royal Television Society award for best documentary of 2014 (4).  According to Sam Dimmer (4) 


“Judges described the documentary as: ‘An astonishing film with incredible access – a brave commission and a brave programme to make.’”

Hunter’s reaction was “This started from nothing and now it’s won a Royal Television Society Award. It’s incredible.”
[end quote]

The recipient of the award was director Dan Reed, who Hunter claimed to ‘idolise.’ 

If you sense another shoe hovering here, then, as they say in dubstep music, get ready for the drop. 

March 18 was also the day that a story that has been simmering on the internet for several weeks or months finally began to break out into the open.  A story of Stinson Hunter, not the old one but the new, involved in the most unexpected and apparently contradictory activity you could possibly imagine.  

It transpires that Hunter, in 2014, actively pursued a hobby called ‘griefing,’ a kind of publicized internet pranking, where his favorite activity was to invade the digital fantasy worlds of young boys in the online game Minecraft, and set fire to their digital buildings.  

Huh?  Is this story trolling?  Is it fake?  No.  It’s all immaculately evidenced, and even tacitly confessed by Hunter himself. 

It begins with a video (5 -- deleted since this story appeared - KB), posted on Nov 29, 2014 on a hosting website called (but possibly first posted elsewhere, some weeks or months earlier) that was produced by an acknowledged associate of Hunter, Michael Donald of Dunfermline, near Edinburgh, Scotland.  Donald is 20-something, a dedicated internet trickster and online ‘football ‘ooligan’ who styles himself ‘The Karrit,’ ‘Killer Karrit’ and ‘Michael the Dug.’  He also frequently describes himself as a ‘c—t’ and a ‘bellend’ (a nasty popular insult implying an idiot, possibly malicious).   

Donald's many and diverse pranks have broken into mainstream press reporting on at least one occasion – on 3 Jan, 2013 (6), Donald made waves by threatening to give out all his banking details online if “bottom of the table Queen’s Park Rangers would lose to European Champions Chelsea” in a televised football match.  ‘QPR,’ as the Rangers are fondly known, did pull off an upset, but the bank details were not forthcoming. 

One of the mainstays of Donald’s ‘KillerKarrit’ Youtube and other video channels is ‘griefing,’ as mentioned above – the destruction of the internal virtual inventories and constructions of online gamers.  Here’s Donald’s introductory comment to one such adventure (7):  


“Minecraft Griefing - Destroying a Welshman's World, by KillerKarrit.  In this video, myself and Stinson Hunter blow up yet another person's world. He (the victim – BN) saves it (saves the damaged version to the server – BN) after we've destroyed it. If you're going to cry about it and try to get me to stop making these- don't waste your time, I plan to make more as the 1.8.2 update (of Minecraft – BN) is brilliant. 
Stinson's Channels: 
Follow me on Twitter! 
Like my Facebook page!”

[end quote]

Games like Minecraft come in a communal, online version in which friendly users invite other members of the player community into their worlds to game with them.  The competition in the games doesn’t turn around the destruction or preservation of the houses and other niceties that the hosting players have erected.  The arrival of a gang of virtual thugs bent on destruction, then, is completely unexpected, and causes shock.  The aptly named ‘griefing’ hobby consists of video-recording the shocked reactions, plus the gleeful destruction, and posting the resulting videos on the internet.  

In the video cited above and a companion video (8), we see the virtual avatars of Donald and Hunter (clearly labelled ‘Stinson Hunter’), and hear the actual voices of these men as they lay waste to virtual worlds that have been constructed by boys whose voices have not yet changed.  That Hunter and ‘The Karrit’ are best of friends is confirmed on Hunter’s Twitter channel.  

“Stinson Hunter on Twitter (31 Jan 2014): "@KillerKarrit @kaneJL haha enter the karrit."(9) 

(Donald is being welcomed as he intervenes to insult a tweeter who was arguing with Hunter) 

Their shared hobby is so revolting that the videos beggar belief.  Only the fact that most viewers are not gamers and don’t understand what has happened has protected Hunter from the outrage his activities would surely provoke in the community.  A supposed protector of online children spends his spare time causing pain and suffering to online children by trashing their video game constructions.  It’s sickening.  

Let’s look at what happens in the first video (7).  Tweeter Kamil Beylant has made a complete transcript of its dialogue, interspersed with comments on what is seen on the video screen (10).  The video is clearly captured from the perspective of Donald’s ‘The Karrit’ Xbox online account. 

It begins with a young boy’s shrill voice telling some men that they’re being horrible and asking them to get away.  A few cuss words are thrown in.  Later screen shots identify the boy as living in the US, and he has a distinct northern US accent.  

A small megaphone symbol shows that player ‘Stinson Hunter’ is speaking. He says, “What’s wrong with you? What’s wrong with you?”  His accent is clearly from the British midlands.  Many online videos featuring Hunter show that he characteristically challenges people by rapidly asking the same question or making the same assertion twice.  

The boy complains back, “What’s wrong with YOU?  You dropped my house!  Everything is gone!” 

The video then shows a typed message to the viewer from Donald. It reads, “Then we convinced him to let us back into his world. We helped rebuild his house.” 

Donald and Hunter re-enter the boy’s virtual world; the latter is seen as a robot-like figure in royal purple with an overhead banner saying ‘Stinson Hunter.’  Donald is seen from his viewer perspective wielding a device called a ‘stone sword.’ He begins smashing up blocks of debris that litter the virtual terrain, ostensibly cleaning up past damage.  He calls the blocks ‘big c—ts’ and makes innuendo-laden remarks like ‘I love smashing c—ts.” The boy complains “this is going to take FOREVER!”  Donald then begins smashing a wall, calling it a ‘cock.’  The action immediately provokes an outcry from the boy, since the wall is, he says, part of his “inventory,” the list of items he has won or built in the game.  

But this is all a distraction.  While Donald is stressing the boy with his slow destruction of debris, Stinson has been over at the boy’s seven-storey house, an item clearly made of virtual wood.  Something is happening over there, out of our range of view.  The boy suddenly shouts, “My house is on fire, my house is on fire!”  Animated flames are bursting out of the fourth level of the house.  We see another ‘griefer,’ a player called ‘xTSx iMoNsTeRv,’ climbing the house towards the fire, perhaps rushing to help put it out.  Donald’s player enters the house and we see Stinson’s character inside.  His player is the only one that has been in the right place to set a fire, though he makes an absurd statement, 'It's the forest fire.' There is no forest. 

The boy’s ‘Sharkman12’ black robot character has remained outside the house.  Donald then, while out of the boy’s online vision, quickly clicks to his inventory and loads his character with an item called ‘fuel.’  We see his character setting a new fire on the inside of the house.  

The boy soon figures out that Stinson and Donald have been deliberately setting fire to his house.  He uses his powers as host to expel the adults from his virtual world, but remains in voice dialogue with them.  He says, 

“First of all, your friend Hunter ... I just got stopped making my house and he’s trying to destroy it again … second of all, if you guys ever, ever, and I mean EVER try to invite me to anything again, well?  you can go screw yourself, and call yourself a c—t!  Yeah!  I’m going to use that c—t word!”  

There is much coarse laughter among the three adults involved. Donald tries to send the boy a ‘friend’ request that would give him higher access to the boy.  The boy, who trusted Donald reluctantly after the first destruction of his property, has now been hardened.  

“I don’t like you, and I don’t WANT to like you. Stop sending me friend requests.  I DON’T LIKE YOU,” he shouts.  “Nobody likes you! Not even Kerrit.  Not even Monster. (He is apparently addressing Hunter here). I don’t like you NONE of you guys. So you guys - can f—k it.” 

If the boy’s parents knew what sort of company he was keeping online, they would be livid.  Though the boy clearly knows a few cuss words, his generous and trusting nature has been abused by a gang of guffawing adult British hooligans. 

And the theme of their hooliganism is one you’d think Hunter would think twice about – arson.  

The adults are so proud of themselves that they post their sadistic, child-tormenting videos on the internet.  The video I’ve described, and a companion piece that shows the virtual worlds of another three boys being set on fire, are said to have been on the KillerKarrit and/or Stinson Hunter Youtube channels for a short while, but then withdrawn.  Copies, however, are circulating elsewhere.  Tweeter Eric Hardcastle re-posted the first video on his own Youtube channel but was obliged to remove it from public view when he received a violation of copyright complaint.  

The official, legally enforceable complaint, according to Hardcastle, came from Stinson Hunter (11).  

That’s the tacit confession of involvement that I referred to above.  

Hunter makes no effort to claim that anyone is impersonating him in the ‘griefing’ videos, and in any case, given his close, long-time association with ‘The Karrit,’ such a claim would not be believable.  

My Twitter researchers have all been blocked by Hunter, so he has not been available to answer questions.  

Though it may seem unbelievable that a supposed child rescuer, reformed arsonist and public hero would busy himself cyberbullying little boys by setting virtual fire to their virtual worlds, Hunter’s action fits a pattern that long-time observers of the internet have seen many times.  

You only need to ask yourself what sort of a personality type would identify himself as a ‘hunter’ of other human beings.  There are many such people on the internet, including many masked members of the shadowy Anonymous movement, and Hunter has much in common with them.  

The problem for a writer writing about such people is how to describe them without inadvertently insulting people who have ‘Shades of Grey’ aspects in their sexualities, that is interests in bondage, discipline and sadomasochism (BDSM).  We commonly use the word ‘sadist’ to refer to two kinds of people: essentially kind and conscientious people who role-play sexually with whips, ligatures, and so on, and essentially sociopathic people who gain pleasure from tormenting others who are helpless and unwilling.  Let’s call the latter ‘sociopathic sadists’ to keep them separate from the former group, which includes many good friends I’ve known. 

Long study has shown that most freelancers who track or ‘hunt’ online pedophiles, whether the latter are trying to have sexual interactions with children or not, are NOT merely do-gooders who aren’t qualified to join the local police force.  In keeping with the old saying ‘every prisoner wants to be a hero,’ such people are often sociopaths who are aware of their social shortcomings but also have a desire to feel good about themselves.  It’s ideal for them if they can look heroic while doing something that gratifies their sociopathic urges.  Humiliating and tormenting people who society despises as sexual deviants fills the bill perfectly.  In 1975, people with this penchant, or at least males, would have got together in a cruisy park at night and looked for queers to bash.  In 2015, that no longer seems heroic to anyone, so the compass of sociopathic heroism has pointed towards pedophiles.  

A typical and well documented sociopathic sadist who made a major impact as an online pedophile tracker was Cynthia Jean Harvey, a 50-year-old computer security professional from Nashville, TN (12).  Working undercover as ‘Determined,’ she was the chief administrator of a pedophile profiling website that sprang up under the umbrella of Perverted Justice (PJ).  While most of PJ concentrated on chat-based entrapment schemes that caught people planning to stage illegal sexual encounters, Harvey’s department, Wikisposure, concentrated on finding and publishing the identities of people posting in online legal (not connected with child pornography) websites hosting discussions among persons attracted to minors.  

It soon became clear that Harvey didn’t care if the people she undertook to expose were involved in illegal acts or not. She portrayed all pedophiles as dangerous, based on the ‘ticking time bomb’ meme that suggests that, since all deviants lack self-control (a residual 19th-century superstition), no one with pedophilic urges would be able to resist committing sexual assaults over the long term.  When she uncovered the identity of one of the pseudonymous posters she was tracking, she and her colleagues did everything possible to warn the person’s online and offline friends, his parents, his employers, and so on, that he was a dangerous man who was probably raping children behind their backs.  In a few cases, these efforts did unmask some lawbreaking; in many others, they merely resulted in the public hounding of conscientious non-offenders. 

Harvey clearly didn’t care.  She stalked teenagers online who spoke about experiencing attraction to young children, and she exposed them to the world as ‘sick,’ dangerous pedophiles as soon as they turned 18.  She relentless violated the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) legislation by pinching and displaying personal images from private social media she had penetrated, and could not be induced to correct any factual error that had become mixed in with her poisonous rants about the ‘sick’ and ‘perverted’ people she was profiling.  When PJ deleted her increasingly illegal web pages, she painstakingly reposted them independently as ‘,’ using complex and costly identity masking techniques to prevent DMCA takedown.  This website eventually floundered due to lack of financial support, but Harvey has again reposted its pages in one of the internet’s most consistently trashbaggy defamation websites,, the TMZ of the nobodies.   

Harvey was finally exposed, herself, by a dogged online sleuth styling herself ‘azu-info.’  It turned out that besides the pedo-hunting Determined, Harvey had a host of other online handles, and many of them were found on online sadomasochism sites.  The most prominent was ‘TrainerC.’  Harvey was and is a sexual sadist, which in itself is arguably benign, but she admitted to several incidents in her past where her sadism had surpassed the usual boundaries.  Says azu-info (substantiating links have been removed but can be seen at reference link 12 below): 


‘As a self-confessed "rapist” by her own account, she is "not a sensual sadist, using the definition that many people use online."  Rather, she takes pleasure in inflicting both physical pain and emotional distress in her victims.

(Here are two quotes:)

    "you WILL suffer for my pleasure," 

    "I'm a 40 year old top who lives in MS and TN. I've owned and trained several slaves in the past 7 years, and have been a sadomasochist for a lot longer." 

Not long ago she was banned from a major BDSM forum chat-room and community for refusing to stop talking about rape. Though also searching for a 'mentor' to help her "deal with the idea that I want to hurt people I like." 

When asked why one would want to rape or hurt their partners, Cynthia explained that, as a sadomasochist, she enjoys "getting off" on the very good illusion of non-consent, though "i'd even wager that sometimes it's not an illusion." 

With her past exploits for Wikisposure and her new exploits on, as well as more recent blogs, she has clearly found an outlet to let some of her most sadistic urges escape into unbounded real-world torment.

        "Now I'm looking for people I can engage with on this level without the yelling and passive aggressiveness, just plain old honest to goodness emotional pain, with the understanding that, yes, this gets me hard, and I hope it does you too, but if not, deal with it. (hell, the latter is more likely to get/keep me hard)"

        "I don't mind causing someone emotional pain while relating something that's gonna hurt because of the nature of the THING itself (well, I do, actually. It's hard. But it has to be done). What I'm talking about is causing someone emotional pain for...the hell of it."’

[end quote]

Once you’ve understood this somewhat parallel case, it becomes clear that it isn’t remotely contradictory for Stinson Hunter to hunt online for people who might be lured into sexually propositioning a young teen, while at the same time spending his fun time tormenting children online by burning their virtual villages.  The common themes are the delight of causing pain to the vulnerable, combined with the triumphant ego that is able to parade these acts of humiliation to the world.  

The hero of Great Britain is a sociopathic sadist.  But British society, in any case, has become something of a madhouse lately.  The long-standing British nervousness about sex has been intensely microwaved with petapixels of online pornography and hundreds of new means to make wanton interpersonal connections.  Faced with the imagined consequences of such liberal electronic communication, the national popcorn is starting to pop:  the UK as a society is having a mental breakdown.  A growing movement has arisen online that is determined to find that every member of the royal family, the broadcasting world, the politicians and the police have been involved in a decades-long, massive conspiracy to cover up rings of elite pedophilic serial murderers.  

In the comments to a Youtube audio recording where an aggressive Stinson Hunter is heard bedeviling an accused critic, grandmother Jo Callaghan, until she threatens suicide (13), the top comment is 


Jonny Parker
5 months ago

More people should be hunting these sick f—ks . Fact is its right at the top, the ruling elite banking families, Bilderberg group etc., etc., all snatch kids rape and kill them, satanic sick f—kers man . But people don’t want to accept that it’s happening and the real truth. Just like 9/11.  

[end quote]

Such sentiments are by no means restricted to a small fringe any more.  

In this rolling atmosphere of witch-hunt, it is very unlikely that the news that Stinson Hunter is part of a gang that regularly torments 12-year-old boys for fun will make any impact.   The matter has already been ignored for months.  The whole tenor of the nation now is to omit such inconveniences from consciousness and to crown the pedophile stalker with laurel wreaths.  Who cares that some of his suicidal stalkees may have been lured across the line into an illegal hookup by a ‘too-good-to-be-true’ offer that they would never have experienced without his entrepreneurship?  Michael Parkes’ child, growing up with no father, may indeed end up suffering, as Parkes' surviving partner has complained in her accused ‘harassment’ of Hunter.   

But as we now know, suffering among children is just part of the fun.  

*****  -30- 




5. Minecraft ‘Griefing’ Video Starring Stinson Hunter.  The author and his collaborators possess copies of all evidence materials.  In case videos are deleted (they currently are - KB), see note on screenshots at bottom of reference list. 



8. Minecraft griefing Video 2 Starring Stinson Hunter: Adult Males Burning Down a Child’s Minecraft Village. 

9. ; screenshot at 

10. US pre-teen gamer boy vs. Stinson Hunter and friend

11. Text: eric hardcastle ‏@EricHardcastle (tweeted to) @urcrazytoo @Securityconcern Copyright violation was from Stinson so he's confirmed it’s him.  Melbourne, Victoria 7:41 AM - 17 Mar 2015


13. Stinson Hunter - Confronts His Online Stalker (Part One)

Note.  15 screenshots documenting key moments in the first ‘griefing’ video have been posted by K. Beylant, starting at 

Addendum - KB 

Complete transcript of Video 1 

"I love smashing cunts"  - video game in which Stinson Hunter gets kicked out, accused of vandalism by pre-teen American boy.
   (Screen grab by player The Karrit)
    Screen:  You were kicked from the game … connection lost
    Boy: You ARE horrible!  That’s why you’re being horrible!  Now fuck you and get aWAY from ME! You bee-yotch!
    Man:  I didn’t do anything wrong!
    Screen: The Karrit - X Box guide
    Man (Stinson Hunter): What’s wrong with you? What’s wrong with you?  
    Boy: What’s wrong with YOU?  You dropped my house!  Everything is gone!  
    Screen:  Xbox Live Party (5):  Invite players to party  
    Stinson Hunter
    V P Tz  
    The Karrit
    sharkman 12
    xTSx iMoNsTeRv
    Screen message:  Then we convinced him to let us back into his world. We helped rebuild his house.  
    Screen:  Xbox Live Party (4):  Invite players to party  
    The Kerrit
    xTSx iMoNsTeRv
    Stinson Hunter
    sharkman 12
    Man (The Karrit): I was just doing the (unclear) and your house was gone. I did not do it –  OK?  (inaudible)
    Boy:  I can’t believe I’m saying this but … (long silence)
    Man:  but what?
    Boy: (exasperated) Fine!
    Man: thank you
    Screen:  game showing square device knocking apart and eliminating scattered blocks made of small brick-like components  
    Banner: Stinson Hunter has joined the game
    Boy: And it doesn’t look like you guys are trying to help me … it just looks like you’ve made another frikking. . .
    Man: I’ve only just joined your world … I’ve literally just joined … (nonsense expletive ‘Raahh!’) just
    Man: right, I’m going to get rid of all this for you (knocking apart brick blocks)  
    Man: I’m going to get rid of this big massive cunt for you (knocking blocks) (wheezy guffaws, titters and other sounds of adult   amusement) I’m smashing all these cunts up
    Boy:  This is going to take forEVER (whimper of protest) .. Oh my gawd, d’you know how much stuff is out here???
    Man:  I love to do it.  I love smashing cunts
    Boy:  ALL THIS STUFF is (throat catches of outrage) laying out here … seriously, this is so unorganized
    Man:  That cunt is now smashed in, it’s never been smashed in like that before. I’m now about to smash some cock  
    Screen:  device starts smashing down lower end of large brick wall
    Boy:  Everything is frikking … (yells at top of lungs) WHY WOULD … IT COMES OUT OF MY INVENTORY!!!
    Man:  Dude, shut up man, I’m just smashing this cock … shut up man, I’ve just smashed the back end of the cock in
    (sound of kid laughing, possibly a different one)
    Boy:  The house is on fire!!  The house is on fire!!
    Man:  Where?  
    Screen:  shows a 7-level house construction with a fire on level 4  
    Boy: Up top!  Up top!
    Man: up there
    Man: Just put the fire out, man.  How the fock has that happened?  
    Man: it’s the forest fire

    Screen: shows Karrit clicking on 'fuel' in his inventory and then lighting a new fire on a wall inside the house.  
    Boy:  You break one more frikking block, I will go off on you, I will murder you, I’ll find where you live and rape you
    Man:  Thank you
    Man:  Sharkman come (unclear) diamonds with me, mate … don’t like doing it by myself, takes ages
    Boy:  OK, that’s it, all of you guys, out, out, out
    Man: Oi!
    Man: What’s up?  What’s up?
    Boy: I want you guys OUT!
    Screen:  xTSx monster has left the game
    Screen:  Invitation panel showing Monster online but no longer in Minecraft
    Screen: moves of inviting Sharkman to play game
    Boy:  first of all, your friend Hunter .. I just got stopped making my house and he’s trying to destroy it again .. second of all, if you guys ever, ever, and I mean EVER try to invite me to anything again, well?  you can go screw yourself, and call yourself a cunt!  Yeah!  I’m going to use that cunt word!  
    Man:  That was a bit … (unclear)
    Boy:  Cuntity cunt cunt cunt  … (adult laughter from more than one channel) How come you started burning my house down??  
    Sharkman United States rep 5 stars, 12135, showing offline …
    Cursor on “join session in progress”  
    Screen: to sharkman12 -- the Karrit wants to be your friend
    Boy:   I don’t like you, and I don’t WANT to like you. Stop sending me friend requests.  I DON’T LIKE YOU.
    Man: What’s wrong man, I just sent you a friend request
    Boy:  I DON’T LIKE YOU. Nobody likes you!  

    Man (Monster): I do.

    Boy:  Not even Kerrit.  Not even Monster.  I don’t like NONE of you guys. So you guys - can fuck it.  

    Man: Shut up, man.
    Screen:  join game in progress
    Screen:  You cannot join this game as you’ve been previously kicked by the host.