Tuesday, December 16, 2008
"Patty Wetterling lost a child to a sex offender. But now that her other child IS a sex offender she wants to back off from her previous pro-child activism. She's hardly an unbiased source."
So says the centerpiece of the Absolute Zero United Cult, Stitches 77. And yet, she's awfully cozy with one of her own targets, Jeremy "Static" Bolick. Remember, she's the one who "outed" him as a so-called "pro-pedo activist" and posted his registry flier on Wikidposers:"
Lets see, CP, considered a "habitual offender," multiple offenses, and a Tier 3 offender. But you know what they say, "all's fair in love and war."
A funny thing happened during this war. Two enemas.. er, "enemies," fell in love. An "anti" and a "pedohead" joined at the hip. Its touching, really. Its even starting to rub off on each other. I already discussed how Stitches 77 is starting to sound like a sex offender apologist (http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/12/watch-out-for-stitches-77.html), but oddly, Jeremy (as he goes by at AZU these days) is starting to sound like an anti, and the antis are fawning over their new boy toy:
The problem for Nigel Oldperv is that words have meaning- and truth is truth, whether he ignores it or not.
Jeremy | 12.14.08 - 1:33 am | #
Controlling language can be an effective way to control public perception"
That's a very good point there.
Stitches77 | Homepage | 12.14.08 - 3:41 am |
The problem for Nigel Oldperv is that words have meaning- and truth is truth, whether he ignores it or not.
Nigel respects words that have meaning only to him, and his perv buddies and supporters. Those words are words that distort the actual truth.
Whether purposely or not- his ignorance airs in believing his own words rather than words of truth.
~**Violet Leaves**~ | Homepage | 12.14.08 - 11:50 am |
Anti-Paedo, in addressing the Patty Wetterling mantra AZU was spouting earlier in the year said this:
On February 11, 2008 at 5:17 pm Vigilant Antis Said:
"Which Patty Wetterling story are you interested in? The one where her son was killed by a sex offender or the one where the other son became a sex offender and she changed her mind?"
Which Stitches 77 story are you interested in? The story of Stitches the Anti and vigilante who called people like the Pope, Patty Wetterling, the Human Rights Watch, and others "Pedo enablers" for speaking out in favor of reforming some sex offender laws? The same Stitches who watch out for those who promote Romeo and Juliet laws?
Or are you interested in the Stitches 77 with a sex offender boyfriend, who now says its okay to have a Romeo and Juliet clause:
Stitches77 - 9:13 AM
"However, we DO need a Romeo & Juliet clause, I agree with Zman there."
Hey, maybe this torrid love affair may educate the wicked bitch of the net. Maybe AZU will change into an organization that actually works toward protecting children rather than their current status as a dangerous cult and cyber-terrorist organization. Maybe something good will come out of this sob story. We can call it "Sleeping With The Enemy 2: Douche and Cunt."
So, after seeing the video, is Petra Luna high, crazy, stupid, or all of the above? You decide. What's with the laugh, anyways? Its no wonder they think such things as Patty Wetterling as a sex offender while idolizing corrupt Mark Lunsford.
Monday, December 15, 2008
The truth is that I am not an exception, I am the rule! Most sex offenders are just like me
- Joseph Duncan Jan 2004
So I went to Joseph Duncan's blog, and didn't find the quote.
You won't find that quote there. Nor anywhere in the January 2004 archives. Does it really matter what Joseph Duncan feels anyways? No. Joseph Duncan doesn't speak for anyone else but Joseph Duncan. Of course, minor details like accuracy has never been protocol at Absolute Zero United. After all, they DID also claim Patty Wetterling had a non-existent sex offender son. And to think people actually believe what AZU says without checking the facts.
Of course, the true context of the passage, found in a different place, can be found below, in a far different place than AZU claimed it was in. [http://fifthnail.blogspot.com/2004/04/known-facts-about-sex-offenders.php]. In reality, most sex offenders won't re-offend, unlike Duncan, making him the exception rather than the rule [http://www.oncefallen.com/Recidivism101.html]. The problem is, AZU wants to find the worst people and attach it to those where it doesn't apply. Can I apply the Andrea Yates case to every mother in America? The problem is, in our paranoia, we have consumed people for behaviors which call for a reprimand wather than a criminal case [see http://www.oncefallen.com/CriminalizingTeenSex.html or http://www.oncefallen.com/youmightbersoif.html]. How can you compare these people, especially those having consensual teen sex with other teens, to a Joseph Duncan, a man who was a serial rapist/ killer? Only people as deluded as AZU can fail to see a difference.
Duncan was the exception, not the rule. The truth is, Duncan is as rare as a lottery winner. They exist, but are very rare. Duncan doesn't speak for the hundreds of thousands of individuals who have learned their lessons and have gone on to live non-offending lives. But stories of success is not what AZU stands for.
Absolute Zero United's tactics are no different from the Ku klux Klan, who will point to every crime committed by an African American man and claim that is proof everyone they hate is evil. Or, they are not above slandering and lying to prove a point. Think about who you want representing this fight, a company like http://www.stopitnow.org/, a place that offers real solutions to a growing concern and issue in the USA, or AZU, who offers nothing more than lies and deception in order to promote themselves? I think the answer is obvious.
Sunday, December 7, 2008
"Watch for someone who defends an 18 year old for having sex with a 14 year old, then when asked the question "Would you have done it if she had been 12?" the response being "Oh NO, absolutely not, there must be a 'line' somewhere" Completely overlooking the fact that there WAS a line and it was crossed."
But then says--
Stitches77 - 9:13 AM
"However, we DO need a Romeo & Juliet clause, I agree with Zman there."
Thus, we must watch out for Stitches 77! The truth is, Stitches77 flip flops more than, well a pair of flip flops. If you read any tag at this site, you'll see what I mean. Stitches 77 condemned the mother of the registries, Patty Wetterling, as a "pedo enabler" with a non-existent "sex offender son"
while playing apologist for Mark Lunsford, a man suspected of viewing child porn and using his daughter's death to cash in with a Hummer, a tricked-out chopper, and a $50k salary for a Foundation that does... um, what DOES it do?
Absolute Zero United attacks Patty Wetterling but defends Mark Lunsford. Ironically, Mark Lunsford's 18 year old son Joshua was arrested for sexual contact with a 14 year old girl, and went to court wearing a "Please Find Jessica" T-Shirt"
Just what is Stitches 77's position on teens having sex with teens? Depends on whether or not she is attacking another person or not. Anyways, Read the facts, and think about it when you see a member of Absolute Zero United, Perverted-Justice, or one of their "associates" blogs about other individuals.
Monday, December 1, 2008
For once, a member of Absolute Zero says something somewhat truthful. Obscenity is NOT protected by the 1st Amendment. However, AZU is ignorant of what the word "obscene" is. Obscenity follows the Miller Test:
Miller test — The Miller test is the list of criteria used to determine whether particular material is obscene. The Supreme Court held in Miller v. California (1973) that the material is obscene if:
1. The average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, which means arousing sexual desire.
2. The work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law.
3. The work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. Court battles often focus on this third prong of the test.
But Rob Taylor is just a Rush Limbaugh wannabe who doesn't know all the facts. His examples given were not "obscene," but may fall under different non-protected speech. But AZU has never been the kind of organization to give you the facts to begin with. Nor are they privy to their own "cause" when it involves people like Mark Lunsford:
(Comment Board for "Nothing Below an Anti"-- ironically with an obscene description of child rape written by a member of AZU):
Stitches 77 says:
"RSO's claim Mark Lunsford had CP on his computer yet there is no evidence to support that. They have a news article, and there's a statement that there was a LOT of adult pornography on his computer and a cp image that didn't even know if it had been accessed or not found in the recycle bin. he could have received it attached to some of the adult porn he downloaded, who knows? The point is that people look at what they are interested in. If I saw someone with a computer full of cp I would think they were interested in children wouldn't you? If they had a computer full of adult porn and one image of cp I would think they were interested in adults and somehow got an attachment."
Really? I know of a case where that happened and AZU attacked the guy en masse. Who said it was one picture anyways? The Citrus County article did not say "one case." I had spoken about their attachment to Lunsford in a previous post:
Stitches also claims "sex offenders can't be cured," yet John Walsh admitted to having a sexual addiction. In the same comment link above, stitch-cunt says:
"John Walsh has said he was sucessfully treated for a sex addiction... Naturally they fail to understand that it's not illegal to have an addiction to sex, it's not illegal to sleep around, it's not illegal to have sex with people who can consent nor is pornography illegal. John Walsh's behavior in NO WAY equates to criminal behavior..."
Again, stitch-cunt has no grasp on sexual addiction. Many sex addicts commit a variety of deviant acts, many of which are illegal. Plus, having an affair is a great betrayal of trust that can leave emotional scars lasting a lifetime for those who do not heal from it. blind hatred in one hand, blind loyalty in the other hand. It leaves little doubt as to AZU's true intentions.
Speaking of obscene language, resident airhead Tracy "WASP Ohio" Golden adds another dumb random comment. No doubts as to the minset of the average AZU troll there:
(message board to "Rickysmom says, 'It was just horrifying' ")
I have an urge to write some stories for theraputic reasons.Anyone interested in a torture murder story about a woman getting even with sex offenders?It is just words.
Yeah. Its "just words" of a depraved individual who poses a clear and present danger to society and who should be civilly commited, along with her alter-ego who has devoted his/her life to creating a phony me and build shrines to me on a daily basis. I have an urge to write, too. A blog about a group of degenerate cyber-bullies posing as child victim advocates. In the end, it truly is about victimization. AZU gets off on rape, torture, and murder. What better way to hide their sadism and psychopathy than under the guise of "child advocacy?"
Sunday, November 30, 2008
I'm sure everyone had heard in the news of teenagers taking nude pictures of themselves and sending it to other teens. This is starting to be a huge problem. Not only are these teens setting themselves up for embarrassment, but they are risking the chance of thier pictures getting on the internet and into the hands of pedophiles.
Not only are they risking becoming victims of child porn, they are also risking becoming sex offenders themselves.
Teens are now being charged with disseminating child pornography, and the reciepients of thier pictures are being threatened with child pornography charges also!
These are not just isolated cases...
My question to you is,
Should teens be charged as sex offenders for sending nude pictures of themselves?
I have already spoken with a Senator on this issue, and I am interested in creating a law that specifically deals with this.
Are these kids sexually deviant, or just stupid?
How much of a price should they have to pay for what they have done?
A few thoughts to ponder before you answer:
This law should have gender equality, meaning you cannot treat the boys any different than the girls.
There are victims with this crime!
1) the picture taker is making themselves a victim of child pornography (but is it illegal and punishable to make yourself a victim on purpose)
2) The person who gets the picture has been forced to view "porn" - if they wanted to or not. Could this cause the person to have any emotional damage?
Are these children sex offenders, or should they be charged with a non-sex crime?
What would you like to see done with this law?
Be Proactive, And Not Reactive !
Women Against Sexual Predators
First off, why is she at a loss for opinions on the subject, besides the fact she's dumber than a bag of rocks? I feel sorry for the senator who spoke with this bimbo. My responses:
1. Should teens be charged as sex offenders for sending nude pictures of themselves?
Response: NO. Do you need a shorter answer, Tracy?
2. I have already spoken with a Senator on this issue, and I am interested in creating a law that specifically deals with this.
Response: Do they take laws scribbled in dyslexic crayon? Seriously though, the thought of someone like HER writing a law should make people cringe.
3. the picture taker is making themselves a victim of child pornography (but is it illegal and punishable to make yourself a victim on purpose)
Response: Would she make that same argument if the scenario was slightly different, say, a teenage girl goes to a nightclub with a fake ID to sleep with an older guy? Tracy lacks the logic capacity to comprehend anything beyond the simplest tasks
4. The person who gets the picture has been forced to view "porn" - if they wanted to or not. Could this cause the person to have any emotional damage?
Response: Or not? Shit, by her own admission on her site, teens are the biggest consumers of porn. And how do you force someone to view a dirty picture? Wow. Hey Tracy, cell phones with text messaging have a nice feature called a "delete" button -- it allows you to remove messages you do not wish to keep, like an unwanted naked picture. Wow -- how convenient!
5. What would you like to see done with this law?
response: Abolish it. Why don't you just take the cell phone away from the irresponsible little brat or just get him/ her one of those featureless phones that only have phone and text only messages? Yes those phones still exist. Give me a break. Sooner or later YOUR brats will be teens, Tracy. Do YOU want them on a registry for sending naughty pics to their dates?
Give me a break. Is Predator Panic so damn bad that we have to give such deep thought to adding yet another case to my growing list of stupid RSO cases?
Thursday, November 13, 2008
WARNING: Have barf-bags handy!
SOA "WelcomeStitches77" Apr. 19, 2008
Static: You make a worthy adversary
Stitches: Why do you believe I'm an adversary?
SOA "Ooooh The Irony!" May 3, 2008
Metanoid: I have been fairly impressed (so far) the way static and Stitches have been dealing with each other. Like any good bartender, though, I do have my big boy boots under the counter. Just in case!
Static: I hope they're VERY big boys- you don't wanna be around when Stitches gets her dander up... :)
Stitches: I'm not afraid of much in this world. But I'm not gonna take on Mets' big boy boots. I do have my limits you know. Woah! My dander? Why Static, it sounds like you're scared of me.
My personal favorite line, however, came from Metanoid: "F1, our goals SHOULD be similar to the AZ folks." Really? So our goal is to harass and intimidate and threaten people into getting what they want? Maybe its for the best SOA dissolved. Metanoid played with fire, and got burned by Absolute Zero, and by the time he realized his folly, the deed was done. Next time, learn to listen to people, Metanoid.
By the way, if you ever meet a certain cocky PO from Florida named DP1/PinkPanther/hopeso, be wary of her. In addition to supporting Absolute Zero United and quoting them as a reference (which is like quoting Mein Kampf for race relations), she offers this gem:
"And what a compliment to you and the regular posters here from the AZ folks. Stick around guys.....we may be on to something very special." The only thing "special" was the collapse of SOA. I discussed the SOA saga in a previous article (http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/06/when-trolls-attack.html), but in this case, I wanted to point out this exchange between Jeremy Static and Marina Stitches77.
Fast forward to the here and now. After disappearing into the night, Jeremy comes back on the side of AZU. Aside from the usual flirting with the Queen of the Damned, he maskes the following cognitive distortion:
The best thing a RSO in these groups could do would be to leave and take care of his own problems first. THEN there may be a way to fix some of the problems with SO policy. If you do these things in the reverse order, all you'll do is waste your time and not fix the problems which got you into this mess in the first place. This is dangerous, irresponsible, and pointless- even counter-productive. It's high time for these RSO's to come out of the "Land of Goshen" and enter the "Promised Land" of personal responsibility.
Come on, Linda- Let my people go...
Jeremy 11.02.08 - 1:03 am
Funny how under an article aptly named "Our Secret Goal," Jacey says the following:
"Recently a volunteer from Perverted-Justice was able to infiltrate SOSEN and was even promoted to being a staff member in their forums."
Later they brag of posting up a site showing STOLEN private messages and IPs. Ironically, Perverted-Justice sympathizer and suspected member Andrew Golden offers up this fact:
"Let’s even ignore the fact that the legislative intent of the CFAA was, quite simply, to criminalize hacking into servers to get information the server owners didn’t want a person to have; in fact, the vast majority of cases prosecuted under the CFAA involve exactly that."
Thanks for the factoid, PJer. No big coincidence that Static disappeared around the time PJ got all this private info PJ/AZ was never supposed to have. At the least, Jeremy looks VERY suspicious, suspicious enough to warrant a CFAA investigation on him. And honestly, to what end does it serve to publicly post IP and personal info on people who randomly enter a site to get advice or to read articles? None. Except to try to scare people or to give dangerous vigilantes like Brett Franklin of Sedalia, MO the means to make threats against people.
Seems like AZU suffers from far more than "Static Cling." It suffers from an impending FBI criminal investigation.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
"You just know Logue was on his belly, paying his dues to his cellmate, on a nightly basis.
Prison was the one place Derek's quivering lips were a highly sought after commodity
Logue Hater 10.24.08 - 9:44 pm #"
"Although it's hard to believe anyone could be so callous, the lowlife posting as 'Logue Hater' is actually taking joy from the idea of someone being raped. You can't get much lower than that."
(Original link: http://haloscan.com/comments/absolutezero/4869993627664023401/#58319)
Absolute Zero United claims that they are against sex crimes, yet here they are advocating raping individuals. For the record, I was never raped in prison, just wishful deluded thinking on their part. But the notion that they get their rocks off by promoting rape of another human being just shows their dangerousness. And while they claim to condemn violence (all the while referring to THEIR counter-rally to a civil rights rally of ex-offender rights as a "HIJACKING"), they feed you these gems:
Certainly all these degenerates weren't offended by the man's actions, they were a clan of soulless monsters who are better off being judged by a court. Or a mob...
They aren't sick, they aren't curable and they can't be reformed. They're simply evil and should be dealt with accordingly. Rob Taylor -- Homepage - 10.23.08 - 1:48 am
And while crying that some viggie got beat up up my a group of people he THREATENED WITH A MACHETE, you get this gem from MUSTY:
Here Derek, Derek, Derek. I got some bikers that would just LOVE to meet you! Come on, what do ya say???
Misty - 10.23.08 - 11:57 pm
I say don't sing it, just bring it. Which bikers? The BACA guys I put on tape at the Ohio Rally who ended up AGREEING with my point of view?
The biker lady's name is Donna Folden by the way. She threatened to sue me over the video being posted on You Tube (despite the factI didn't post it), and wrote the world's most poorly written "cease and desist order." The same Donna Folden who was silenced by a single email from an attorney who gave her the REAL definition of defamaion and slander. Heh. I'm so NOT scared. Then again BACA WAS involved in a murder-for-hire scheme in Texas, as reported by the Waco Tribune in January 2008:
"Investigators found evidence at a China Spring home they say is connected to a murder-for-hire scheme planned by members of the motorcycle group Bikers Against Child Abuse.
Vera Elizabeth Guthrie-Nail, a 42-year-old China Spring native and Carrollton resident, was arrested Jan. 10 in the Dallas area on a criminal solicitation of murder charge in the death of her estranged 36-year-old husband, Craig Nail, said Sgt. Gerald Meadors"
Its going to take more than threats or bikers and fliers and and crying to corrupt ASSistant DA Patrick Dressing to silence THE TRUTH. The truth that Absolute Zero United is a terrorist organization posing as a pseudo-child-advocate blog and fails miserably at doing so. (PS next time you all talk to Dressing, be sure you tell him I said "GO FUCK YOURSELF, LOSER!")
PS: Mr. Punch - coldgrapecrush - evilclownwithabat - loguehater - Donny, you're not fooling anybody. And all in all, you're STILL a coward, just like the rest of the AZU trolls who hide in anonymity. I'm still waiting for you to come spit in my face you douchebag. But evilclownwithabat obviously has NO BALLS!
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Six arraigned in brutal Seneca Falls attack
Six people arrested in connection with a brutal attack in Seneca Falls were in court Monday.
William, Brandon, Justin Meacham and Marvin Snyder are all charged with first degree gang assault. Stephanie Meachum and her sister Angela Wheeler are also charged with gang assault and face additional attempted assault charges. William Meacham is a convicted sex offender.
They're all accused of brutally beating Adrian Porter in his apartment complex last month. Porter was found in the parking lot of the apartment complex where he lived. He was bleeding and unconscious. Family members say he suffered a broken nose, facial fractures, and brain trauma.
"I want justice in my brother's case," Porter's sister Selena McKoy said. "Point blank. Because no human being should ever have to go through something like that."
Seneca Falls Police say the attack appeared to be retaliation for Porter trying to alert his neighbors about sex offenders who lived in their complex.
"We found that Mr. Porter had downloaded the photos of sex offenders that lived in the complex, and had posted them somewhere in the vicinity of the laundromat that's in the facility." Seneca Falls Police Chief Frederick Capozzi said.
After court, Porter's sister and members of the Meacham family had a heated exchange before the mother of five of the suspects came to their defense.
"I'm not saying my kids done right, they done wrong," Sheryl Meachum said. "But when you're being run down with a machete, you're not going to stand there. You're going to fight back."
Police and the Seneca County District Attorney couldn't comment on the use of that machete. They say it's part of their investigation into what the DA calls a tragedy for everyone involved.
"This was a tragic affair for the Porter family," Seneca County District Attorney Richard Swinehart said. "He was seriously injured by a group of people, that's why we brought gang assault charges here today. It's obviously a tragedy for the Meacham family, who have five of their relatives all in jail right now, plus one of their friends."
Adrian Porter is currently recovering at the brain trauma unit at Saint Mary's Hospital in Rochester. His mother Deborah Williams says her son has been able to move and talk somewhat, though he is still experiencing problems with his memory.
I don't feel even remotely sorry for Porter. You harassed someone and threatened him with a machete. Just like how members of Absolute Zero United and Perverted Justice threaten and harass someone, only anonymously. But it backfired. Unlike that kid beaten by that crazy crackhead in Washington, this man fought back, and beat the viggie senseless. Vigilante justice is dangerous work. Next time, leave the job of dealing with Former Offenders to LE.
ADDENDUM: And right on cue Absolute Zeroes Retarded retaliates with their usual slant on the story. Now vigilante scumbag Porter is "a concerned father" who "was concerned about sex offenders living in his apartment complex." Of course, Stitch-cunt and company forgets the "concerned father" was in fact a MACHETE-WIELDING MADMAN, and the entire neighborhood watched the spectacle take place. Of course, you can expect no less from Absolute Zero United, who defended a woman with a mile-long history of assault and drug charges when she attacked a Former Offender with a baseball bat (Tammy Lee Gibson), and came to the defense of Travis Metcalf, the man who was arrested for publicly threatening a Former Offender in Colorado then couldn't get his facts straight on the local media blog (both stories have been addressed in this blog).
Of course, what less would we expect from AZU, who advocates AND PARTICIPATES in threatening, intimidating, and stalking Former Offenders? (Of course, they also inspire other psychopaths like Porter to follow their lead). Funny how AZU believes merely the act of warning someone of the dangers of their actions is "condoning" the behavior.
Sunday, October 19, 2008
The unholy union of Perverted Justice and Absolute Zero United continues to sink to new lows. The latest low? Now they are blatently trying to sponge off people who are angry over the disappearance of a little girl. Simply click on the link above and see for yourself. The site is about a rather high-profile case, the disappearance of Caylee Anthony, of which the mother is suspected of killing the little girl. At the bottom of the front page, there is the following:
"DO NOT DONATE TO THE FIND CAYLEE FUND OFFERED BY THE ANTHONY FAMILY. A CERTAIN ANTHONY KNOWS WHERE SHE LEFT CAYLEES BODY. IF YOU'D LIKE TO HELP WE SUGGEST REPUTABLE CHARITIES THAT ACTUALLY HELP CHILDREN AND HAVE LISTED A FEW LINKS BELOW:"
And followed by a link to Perverted-Justice.com.
WTF!?! What does this case have to do with the Perverted Justice/ Absolute Zero United cult? Absolutely NOTHING!Nothing except the money. Indeed there is money to be made, and the PJ/AZU unholy alliance KNOWS the benefit of exploiting a child's death for personal profit! They must have went to the JOHN WALSH/ MARK LUNSFORD School of Child Death Exploitation!
Monday, October 13, 2008
Some things don't need to be explained, like how psychopathic (and stoned) Petra Luna was during her infamous 20/20 interview this past March. So this guy, don't know who he is, has a VERY INTERESTING interpretation of Petra Looney's infamous interview. Seems like there is a general consensus about Luna's 20/20 appearance is this--
1. She's a psycho BEE-yotch
2. She was intoxicated
3. She's a terrorist.
Its safe to say the millions of people who watched the infamous 20/20 Luna-tic interview pretty much came to the same conclusion. Sadly, Luna's the voice for the cyber-terrorists
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
He kept mentioning "Soldier of Fortune" (the magazine) so I replied he's a Soldier of MISfortune.
Brett says F*** Pee-J and "do'nt assosiate with those assholes," but then he says they should be more PROACTIVE. I of course called him out on his hypocrisy.
Funny thing is, he claims he DOESN'T HAVE A PROBLEM with my activism. Then why bother me? Guess he wanted my endless supply of putdowns and one-liners directed at him.
He claims to have served time in Levenworth. Okay, if you served time in a FEDERAL prison, how can he be working for the Feds? My guess is he's the Otis of Sedalia, MO.
Anyways, if this clown calls, call the police. Tell him not to call. Record the conversation. Just to be safe, consider him a threat
ADDENDUM: Looks like this Brett Franklin Idiot has ALREADY pissed off other people:
Thursday, September 11, 2008
This was another one of those Absolute Zero trolls. Operative word -- WAS. If you go there NOW, you get this instead --
"This blog has been archived or suspended for a violation of our Terms of Service."
Good riddence to bad rubbish! This is actually the SECOND website of theirs to die. Earlier this year, http://absolutezerounited.org/ bit the dust. More recently, Barb Ireland's http://sbglw.com/ abruptly disappeared. Garbage In, Garbage Out! Nah nah nah nah, nah nah NAH NAH, Hey Hey Hey, Good bye! Another one bites the dust! Next, maybe goodbye to the mother ship!
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Stitchbrains says: "That's also why you'll never get your predator status reduced, you'll never get off the registry and I have no doubt in my mind that you will end up in prison again."
Really now? I've been out 5 1/2 years now, and except for AZU, no one thinks my incarceration is imminent. So I offered a challenge to Stitches77 herself. My challenge:
I WILL PUT UP BOTH THIS BLOG AND MY ONCE FALLEN SITE UP AGAINST THEIR ABSOLUTE ZERO BLOGSPOT. IF BY THIS TIME NEXT YEAR, I AM INDEED INCARCERATED, I WILL GLADLY TURN OVER THE COPYRIGHT OF THESE SITES TO AZU. IF BY THIS TIME NEXT YEAR, I AM NOT INCARCERATED, ABSOLUTE ZERO UNITED RELINQUISHES THEIR SITE.
Sitches77 is normally an arrogant person, yet she didn't even bother posting my challenge. Why? She KNOWS she will lose. She's not as confident as she'd have you believe. She writes checks her organization cannot cash. There is a reason she attacks my character rather than my research. But she knows her character attacks ring hollow, because her attacks are made out of hate, not out of fact. Yet if she truly believed these words, she would not have ignored my challenge. Do you smell what the Stitch is cooking? Smells likeBULLSHIT!
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Anyways the show synopsis is below:
Thursday, August 7, 2008
Wis. charges say gunman had `nothing to lose'
By DINESH RAMDE – 13 hours ago
MARINETTE, Wis. (AP) — Scott J. Johnson hid in the woods knowing police were coming after him.
He had nothing to lose, plotting to kill as many officers as he could after luring them to a nearby river by ambushing a group of teenagers, according to a criminal complaint.
Johnson gunned down three teens as they relaxed near a bridge spanning the Menominee River between Wisconsin and Michigan's Upper Peninsula that is a popular swimming site, prosecutors said Wednesday.
"His plan was to shoot anyone who showed up to help," Marinette County District Attorney Brent DeBord said.
But Johnson apparently reconsidered after shooting the teens, the complaint said. Following an all-night manhunt, he surrendered to authorities, disabling his military-type rifle in a way that would be obvious to them, DeBord said.
Johnson, 38, of Kingsford, Mich., was charged Wednesday with three counts of first-degree intentional homicide. The charge carries a maximum penalty of life in prison.
Johnson's public defender, Len Kachinsky, said he plans to hold his first meeting with Johnson before a court hearing Thursday.
"I think people should maintain an open mind and withhold judgment until the evidence is in," Kachinsky said.
The complaint tells a chilling story of a disaffected man who had thought about committing a random shooting for the past four or five years and prepared by stashing weapons in the woods.
"He stated that the sole purpose of his hiding this equipment was for when a day like this came," DeBord said.
Johnson finally decided to execute his plan last week after suspecting that a woman he had recently sexually assaulted would tell her ordeal to police, the complaint said.
He has not been charged with sexual assault, but more charges could still be filed, DeBord said at a news conference Wednesday at which he read the complaint but declined to take questions.
The complaint gives the following account:
Johnson said he lured the woman near the bridge the evening before the shooting, sexually assaulted her and tried to talk her out of calling police. He decided to wait there and kill any law enforcers who arrived to investigate. When none did, he returned home.
He left his home the next day and when he returned, his mother told him police were looking for him. Expecting to go to jail and fearing the label of sex offender, he decided "he had nothing to lose and the only power he had in this life was `to take.'"
He returned to the bridge, where he counted eight teenagers. He recovered his hidden Armalite 7.62 mm military-type rifle and an ammunition box with .308 cartridges that he had stowed at least a year before.
He found a hill on the Wisconsin side where he could shoot. He planned to wait until the youths were back on the Michigan side and shoot them as "bait" to lure law enforcers he could then also shoot.
But he was startled when four of the teens began to climb up toward him, instead of taking the path he expected. When the teens approached, he felt trapped and jumped up, firing about 17 shots. He saw people fall as he began to reload but decided not to fire again.
Johnson spent the night in the woods and turned himself in the next morning as an intensive manhunt was under way.
"Before exiting the woods, he disabled the firearm in a way so that law enforcement could see that the gun was disabled," DeBord said.
Two teens, Tiffany Pohlson, 17, and Anthony Spigarelli, 18, died instantly from single shots to the head. The third, Bryan Mort, 19, died of a shot to the torso. A 20-year-old man suffered superficial shrapnel wounds. All four were from Michigan.
The location of the wounds suggested all four were fleeing, said Scott Celello, undersheriff for Dickinson County, Mich.
Johnson's mother, Judy Johnson, had said her son was honorably discharged from the Army in 1994 without serving overseas and has been unemployed. She described him as despondent since his wife left him in 2001 and took their two children with her. She said she worried he might "do something stupid."
DeBord is handling the case because the shots were fired from the Wisconsin side. Michigan authorities are still investigating and could file additional charges, he said.
Christopher Ninomiya, the Dickinson County district attorney, did not immediately return a message left Wednesday seeking comment.
And yet the trolls over at Absolue Zero United think its all fun and games? You condemned someone for merely acknowledging the possibility it was inevitable? Well here is proof it is not only possible, not only inevitable, but a COLD HARD REALITY! Do you STILL think this all a fun game, Stitches?
Tuesday, August 5, 2008
How about I castrate you dressed up as a little girl? That way we both win! Sorry, fresh out of anesthesia. lameo 08.04.08 - 5:08 am
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Here in these parts we call them there mistakes "cognitive distortions," Tracy Golden!
Its been a while since Tracy Golden of Columbus, Ohio (aka, "WASP Ohio") did something stupid, so this is especially enjoyable. I wonder how Cincinnati's City Beat magazine got her contact info, since the bug has been in hiding for a while, except when holding spaghetti dinners in the sticks. Anyhoo, City Beat reveals to us how Tracy suffers from "Foot In Mouth" disease:
"The potential for false accusations and botched investigations is something Tracy Golden, president of the Ohio chapter of Women Against Sexual Predators, avoids addressing. When asked to comment about the potential harm done to children and families when false accusations of abuse are made, she doesn't respond."
Okay, we have a situation where we are taking about HARM TO CHILDREN. After all, WASP claims to be a victim advocate. Yet when the reporter asks about potential harm from children as a result of a nonsensical law (a law WASP supports of course), you could here the crickets chirp from Columbus all the way to Cincinnati. She does say this little piece of stupidity:
"Golden says children won't be taken from a safe home environment as a result of HB111."
Forrest Golden-- stupid says as stupid thinks.
Did I ever mention I was a foster child, Tracy? Oh yeah, we can trust overzealous 241-KIDS workers to handle allegations with fairness and diligence. In her email she sent to the AZhole thugs, the Lunsford Foundation, and the rest of her cyber-trolls she says this:
"I am in need of your help! I need you to write or call the Ohio Senate members and tell them you are in support of HB111. Children should not be led to the slaughter by careless parents."
The sky is falling, Tracy Little!
By the way, she adds her usual spiel of uncited statistics, except now she's finally admitting that stanger danger is as full of shit as SHE is! She flip flops more than, well, a pair of flip flops! I reckon she's thinking of running for congress or something! As idiotic as most Gestap-Ohio politicos are, I better not give her any ideas.
Misquoting statistics, dodging legitimate questions, and fear mongering tactics are typical AZU fare.
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Since someone knowing my real identity could result in harassment or possibly out me, i have decided to use my initials.Feel free to use your initials. RZ Homepage 07.13.08 - 5:55 pm
how are those for initials? FU 07.14.08 - 2:28 am
Very appropriate IMHO Stitches77 07.14.08 - 2:53 am
It is exchanges like these that get me laughing... Well, until Stitches of the seventy-and-seven venereal diseases starts "editing" posts. As previously noted from my SOA article, AZU is filled with idiots have trouble dishing out what they take. As usual, the whiny bitches over at AZU, who claims their site is an OPEN forum, has decided to.. *ahem*.. estblish ground rules just for him.
We are instituting a new set of rules specifically for the continued harassing, distorted and generally obnoxious comments of Zandir Effective immediately the following will not be allowed from zandirt
#1 - NO victim bashing
#2 - NO rationalizations
#3 - NO lies
#4 - NO promotion of pedophilia
These rules are subject to new additions as *I* see fit regardless of whatever-the-fuck zandir thinks about them Stitches Stitches77 07.14.08 - 2:52 pm
Two new rules for zandir
#5 - No disagreement with anti's
#6 - No questions Stitches Stitches77 07.14.08 - 7:07 pm
Why does stitch-for-brains sign her name twice? Anyways, AZU, allegedly an "open" forum, is VERY selective in what they post, and edit everything that they don't like. I can think of many others they have denied this "open" exchange to in recent months. I remember Stitchbitch telling me at SOA that if I wanted to discuss AZU go to AZU. Yeah, right. Like they've allowed Zandir, AZHK, and others to have equal say there. I wouldn't waste my time.
Apparently they can't take the heat!
There is something I don't get. If they represent the majority's view, and they are "heroes" and "child advocates," why do they hide their identities? If I was a "hero," I'd be parading my celebrity status around. I think it is because they KNOW theyare skanky cyberterrorists ready to be placed in the bighouse. That and they are afraid. They don't have friends, only enemies. They don't even have a life!
Ironically, they are crying Zandir's "harassing" them. WTF? And just what are THEY doing to people? I smell hypocrisy. I was given the same accusation a while back by Stitchshitstains; she claimed I was "harassing" the antis for calling them out on their own harassment of others! Apparently if you call them out for committing cybercrimes, you are "harassing" them.
You know what they say, though-- if you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen!
Thursday, July 3, 2008
"While police and prosecutors have condemned Gibson's actions, the attack has made her a hero among bloggers and commentators on Internet message boards. When the attack made the news, many in the blogosphere lauded her for protecting her daughter."
That is just sick. People are applauding vigilante violence. Surprisingly, AZU has been largely silent about this while dealing with some internal strife and whining about how SCOTUS upheld the US Constitution in a sex crime case; however, as recent experience has shown us, Absolute Zero United is notorious for sticking up for people who use vigilante violence (see http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/05/azu-encourages-vigilantism-so-does.html).
"He's gonna do it again," she told people. "Are you OK with that?"
When people didn't seem panicked, she said, she became upset.
"I was just thinking to myself, 'Man, I'm not gonna stop,' " she said.
So her hue and cry didn't alarm the neighbors. Is it possible that her neighbors didn't think it necessary to beat the guy with a baseball bat?
While some have criticized Gibson's arrest, prosecutors said citizens should not take the law into their own hands regardless of the circumstances.
"Obviously, the purpose of notifying neighborhoods of sex offenders moving in is not so they can be targeted for persecution, but to put them [neighbors] on notice," said Pierce County Deputy Prosecutor Phil Sorensen. "This is not the intended result of notifying a neighborhood."
And yet, Crazy Tammy did it anyways. It makes a strong case for abolishing public registries.
Although the bail bonds company isn't releasing the source of the money, a "Free Tammy" movement to raise money for Gibson's bail was organized after she was charged with second-degree assault and a felony harassment on June 20.
I'd've paid to keep her incarcerated myself. By the way, Second Degree Assault is a Class B felony (up to 10 years and a $10,000 fine) , and Felony Harassment is a Class C Felony (up to 5 years and a $5,000 fine). See: http://www.societyofcounsel.org/crime_classifications.htm for Washington sentening guidelines. By thew way, Washington has a three-strikes and your out law; Gibson has a decades long rap sheet which includes ASSAULT and DRUG charges. I hope she gets a mandatory life sentence.
In a poll conducted by KIRO-TV in Washington state, as of this writing, 496 voters (42%) call crazy Tammy a "hero," while 584 (49%) call her a "criminal." Forty two percent of the public commend this crazy bitch!
E-advocate found over 110 murders of Former Offenders as of September 2007 (http://sexoffenderresearch.blogspot.com/search/label/%28.Murdered%20RSOs%20in%20the%20U.S.). This doesn't include incidents like Crazy Tammy beating a Fomer Offender with a ball bat. But the prevailing theme is society is obsessed with revenge rather than rehabilitation, and vengeance rather than justice. This is why places like Absolute Zero United continue to exist. I always believed Absolute Zero United to be the extreme form of terrorism, but they are merely a gauge of how depraved our society has become.
Friday, June 27, 2008
I haven't been visiting them lately because I have a life, but I thought I'd breeze through the site to see what I missed. And what I saw today had me laughing so hard I almost fell out of my chair! It seems a noob has entered the criminal-den, trying to suck up to the established cyber-criminals, with disasterous results LOL:
(The comments from "chalk one up for the pedos")
I have a theory- nay, a DREAM- that the Z in ZandJsmom stands for "Zandir." Mrs. Drejaj, is that you? lameo 06.26.08 - 4:26 pm
I suggest you apologize to me immediately, Lameo. How dare you insinuate that I am at all connected to this piece of filth. Stitches for one knows full well who and where I am. Bite me.ZandJsMom 06.26.08 - 7:33 pm
I expect the apology to come quickly. That was over the top. ZandJsMom has history here.Stitchesstitches77 Homepage 06.26.08 - 7:42 pm
"I have a theory- nay, a DREAM- that the Z in ZandJsmom stands for "Zandir." Mrs. Drejaj, is that you?"See how quickly the antis turn against you.You fucking moron.zandir Homepage 06.26.08 - 7:59 pm (NOTE: ROTLFMAO!)
People, I am sorry for any harm or damage I might have caused for what was a scare tactic targeted at a pedophile and not a personal attack. Also, I am sorry about a passing statement that is now being used to pick apart my character. It was simply my opinion on one thing which in no way indicates an opposition to the purpose of AZU or anti-pedophilia activism, WHICH I AM A PART OF.lameo 06.26.08 - 8:02 pm (NOTE: So here is the apology, but catch ZandJ'smom's reply-- obviously hukd on fonix didn't wurk 4 her!)
Still waiting on that apology here, LAMEo. ZandJsMom 06.26.08 - 8:14 pm (NOTE: imagine that-- me agreeing with an anti. Maybe with this miracle, I can turn lead into gold too!)
Oh, and did you just call me a "fool?" What are you, a YuGiOh villain? lameo 06.26.08 - 8:20 pm (I'm sure most of the AZholes are indeed villains, too bad unlike YuGiOh cards, are entirely worthless)
It pretty much goes on back to their original intent of harassing people from there but i was nice to read a few lines of trouble in paradise.
Oh and the while blasting a politician:
Commenting on "I'm going to rip them apart")
YOU GUYS, READ THIS-I hate to admit this, but I have just found out that this quote is, fortunately, taken out of context. He was speaking about the welfare of children who have to testify. Now I look like an idiot for writing about it and making all my friends read.
I'm not yelling at you for not doing your homework, but please read this. lameo 06.26.08 - 5:45 pm (NOTE: OMG! Lameo just committed the cardinal sin! He actually told azu they DIDN'T DO THEIR HOMEWORK!!!! ROTFLMAO!)
lameo nothing was taken out of context. The passage you quoted means exactly the same as the one quoted in the post.As we've explained numerous times to so many pedos, a quote can only be taken out of context if it takes on a different meaning.It truly troubles me that you're having a problem understanding this. Daydreamer of Oz 06.26.08 - 6:30 pm (NOTE: This coming from the idiot that called the Pope a pedo-enabler)
Really? I'm definitely seeing a different meaning there. He's saying that children shouldn't be interrogated. lameo 06.26.08 - 6:39 pm
Really? I'm definitely seeing a different meaning there.I'm not. He's still saying he'll "rip kids apart" and he's still saying he will defend his clients more vehemently if they're facing a life sentence as opposed to any other sentence.He's saying that children shouldn't be interrogated.He didn't say that at all.Daydreamer of Oz 06.26.08 - 6:54 pm (NOTE: Yeah- that's what defense attorneys are Supposed to do, Dumbasser of Oz)
"Okay, let's agree to disagree. I am obviously fighting for the same things as you guys"I don't know any such thing at all. You're making some very iffy remarks that disturb me.Stitches stitches77 06.26.08 - 7:35 pm (NOTE: Yeah, we know truth make you iffy, Bitches of the seventy and seven brain cells)
Okay, that's a little much. I am a victim and a survivor who has been on this board fighting vehemently against pedophiles. I simply interpret that one quote differently. I am certainly not arguing with the fact your interpretation makes Fagan a degenerate. It's not that big of a deal and certainly no reason to question my intentions, which, by the way, breaks my heart. lameo 06.26.08 - 7:42 pm (NOTE: Awww poor Lame-o. Didn't you know Bitches likes people to brown nose and enable her LIES? Stick with YuGiOh cards, dude)
"which, by the way, breaks my heart."Imagine how ZandJsMom's felt Stitches stitches77 Homepage 06.26.08 - 7:46 pm (NOTE: Apparently elephants and skank hos never forget. Guess what? She will bring this up in 2068, when you're in the nursing home too)
I can't believe I'm being vilified. This is ridiculous. I am one of you. I'm not arguing against any of your principles or ANYTHING. I just disagreed with the interpretation of ONE QUOTE. You are making a mountain of a mole hill. lameo 06.26.08 - 7:54 pm
"which, by the way, breaks my heart."Imagine how ZandJsMom's felt"Thank you Stitches, I appreciate that. Rather though than being heartbroken by being insulted by a pedophile or one of their sympathizers, its more a feeling of revulsion, like when a nasty insect skitters over your shoe.ZandJsMom 06.26.08 - 7:54 pm (NOTE: So lameo is a "pedo sympathizer" because lameo hurt the feelings of one of the AZholes. Now you know what it takes to be a pedo enabler in the eyes of AZU, my friends)
" I can't believe I'm being vilified. This is ridiculous. I am one of you"That remains to be seen. You can't even decide where you are or if you're male or female. Maybe that's why you flip-flop Stitches stitches77 Homepage 06.26.08 - 8:02 pm (NOTE: I recall stitchbitch was defending a homosexual not too long ago. Stitches flip flops on more issues than Barack Osama)
I can't? I've never claimed to be either. And as for the first part? Fine. lameo 06.26.08 - 8:10 pm
You gotta love these kinds of exchanges. No honor among thieves. Keep them coming, you filthy AZU douchebags!
Thursday, June 5, 2008
What is Sex Offender Alliance? It was allegedly a treatment-oriented website for former offenders. I had my suspicious about SOA being a front for the AZholes, a reservation shared by many individuals. Whatever the case, the AZholes had invaded the site around the middle of April 2008. A few of the former offenders naively thought that this was an opprtunity to meet on "neutral ground." Personally I didn't refer to SOA as "neutral ground." Whether Metanoid, the head of SOA was simply naive or had an ulterior motive, the fact remains that the AZholes took advantage of the situation.
Think about this, who in their right mind would go to a sex offender treatment place and post written child porn? Why would a sex offender treatment provider advocate taking abuse from other people knowing that stress could potentially trigger relapse? What did the AZholes have to gain from attacking not only a treatment provider but a VICTIM of a sex crime as well? And how was it that SOA user info was taken to be placed on Wikisposure when some of the people never even visited an AZU site before? There are a lot of unanswered questions.
If SOA was an AZ front, then good riddence. But what if it was legit? Then it stands as a testament to the idiocracy of the AZholes. You see, they CLAIM to be victim advoates. But in reality, its about hurting people. Are you a victim of a sex crime, but decided to treat the offender instead of beat the offender? Then they'll accuse you of a "sick pedophile fantasy." Like they once said it doesn't matter if you're the Pope, they'll call you a pedo enabler too!
The bottom line is this-- there is NO GOOD to come from the AZholes. If they enter the site, kick them off, PERIOD. They're nothing but a bunch of worthless fucks who enjoy making people miserable. You have two choices, ignore them, or fuck with them twice as bad like I do. If you stand up to them, you'll win. If you submit to the AZholes and kiss their asses like Metanoid over at SOA did, then you'll end up like SOA. Don't lay down and take it in the ass! Fight back!!!
Sunday, May 18, 2008
myaccount238: If there is another Ohio rally, I will drive there to spit in your
me: That would be a big mistake
myaccount238: we'll see how tough you are quiverteeth
me: Better bring backup
me: By the way spitting is assault
me: You'd be arrested on the spot
Me: Your husband would be so jealous
(Thanks for being stupid AZU by the way. By the way they did call me "great"-- Thanks for the compliments LOL
myaccount238: You will win in court, sue everyone, and live happily ever after
myaccount238: ***** the great
Me: That's the plan
Me: Thanks for admitting I'm great)
By the way, AZU is pretty open about encouraging vigilantism. For example, AZU numbnut Carisma came to the rescue of Travis Metcalf, a man who was cited for disorderly conduct for threatening a sex offnder in public:
Metcalf admits he lost control of his emotions.
“I was screaming at the top of my lungs at him,” said the 34-year-old Metcalf, a husband and a father of three children, ages 14, 12 and 5. “I ended up getting a ticket for disorderly conduct out of the deal.”
And Travis Metcalf should have gotten more, in my opinion, to teach people a hard lesson about vigilante violence. And he isn't learning his lesson:
"Despite his June 25 court date, Metcalf said he is keeping the pressure on Larsen by distributing fliers with Larsen’s picture and identifying information, and Metcalf is attempting to organize a 'parent watch' to raise public awareness. "
So it is NO surprise he fits in with AZU. So says Carisma:
May 11, 2008 10:14 PM
"Any parent would have done the same thing as Metcalf. He didn't assault him, he called him on it! Thank god he did."
No, any good parent would have called the cops and presented evidence of the former offender's improprieties. Not only is vigilante violence illegal, but DANGEROUS! Oh but there's more:
May 12, 2008 10:38 AM Link to this
"We (that count) are all behind you, Travis Metcalf! Let us know what you need." Yep! Keep up the good work! Travis hurt no one and only saved a child! [Note: He only hurt no one because the cops showed up]
May 12, 2008 11:12 AM
Metcalf is a hero and it appears the only people who don't realize it are guys who would think there's nothing wrong with lurking outside a preschool hiding in a bush.
May 12, 2008 4:23 AM Link to this
Shouting at a man who is hiding in a bush outside a preschool is Not harassment.
These people don't seem to understand you just don't get a citation for "doing the right thing." Getting up and threatening a person is NOT "doing the right thing." CALLING THE COPS WHEN YOU SEE SOMETHING WRONG IS THE RIGHT THING!
Think about THIS folks, why is it Absolute Zero United hides their identity? Why aren't they touted as "heroes" for their work? Because cyberstalking, abuse of the registry, harassment, and threats of violence are ILLEGAL, that's why. They are CRIMINALS, plain and simple. Thugs.
By the way, why would a site like Family Watchdog tell people the first thing to do is to get up in people's faces. Read the article again:
Steve Roddel, president and CEO of Family Watchdog, said the 3-year-old site is updated throughout the day with the latest information available. He said he is unable to chastise people like Metcalf who use the site as a tool to protect their children and their community.
“It would be awfully hard for me to find fault with someone who is out trying to protect his community,” Roddel said.
He added that if a convicted sex offender is displaying high-risk behaviors, like hanging out at parks and schools with a puppy, that person should be confronted and made aware that he is being watched.
Tell them you know who they are, and, ‘You are not going to do it on my watch,’ ” Roddel said. “I wouldn’t necessarily call it overreacting.”
What happened to "if you see a crime call the police?" Duh. Someone shove the Watchmutt's nose in the shit they're shoveling! What if that guy had been packing heat? You don't just get up in a guy's face, that's a potentially dangerous situation. Hell, pull out a video camera, take pics, turn over to police, and the guy would have been in jail. Simple as 1-2-3! Of course, leave it to Family Watchdog and Absolute Zero United to put two and two together and only come up with three!
Oh yeah, one last thing, someone pointed out that I needed to add the following:
Note: The following information is provided as an awareness tool so that you can adequately protect yourself and your children from these individuals. The use of the sex offender registry information to harass, endanger, intimidate, threaten or in any way seek retribution on an offender through illegal channels is prohibited. Any person who engages or participates in such acts may be charged criminally."
And on the FamilyWatchDog TOS, it states:"Harassment, stalking, or threatening anyone on this list likely violates your state law and is neither condoned nor encouraged by Family Watchdog, its directors or employees."
So its not only illegal to use the registry info to harass people, it violates the Family Watchmutt TOS too! Then Roddel contradicts his own company. A classic!
Friday, May 2, 2008
Court records indicate that the teenager allegedly put his hands down the pants of his 14-year-old girlfriend while they were kissing. Because the alleged incidents occurred less than two months after Joshua turned 18, he has been charged with a fourth degree felony.
The girl’s father pleaded guilty earlier this year to trying to choke Joshua.
Mark Lunsford has been quoted as saying that his son’s arrest doesn’t compare with the pedophiles whom he has helped to put in prison. “We’re talking about Romeo and Juliet here, not some 36-year-old pervert following around a 10-year-old”, Lunsford told a Florida newspaper. He is not the boy’s custodial parent and the boy does not live with him.
When asked how he felt about his son being labeled a sex offender if he was convicted, Lunsford said that “we have to learn to distinguish between Romeo and Juliet and a predator. We need to redefine the term ‘sex offender’, not ‘predator’”.
I brought this up not to debate that issue. I want you to compare that to the comments AZU mmber Petra Luna made on 20/20 back on March 14, 2008 (The corrupted- justice link is a transcript of the segment):
http://www.abcnews.go.com/2020/Stossel (go to videos, look for "Vigilante Justice")
Stossel-- Arent some people on the registries kids who at age 16 had sex with another kid?
Peta Luna-- [rolls eyes] Yeah [sighs and shifts in chair] but that's not very likely, but it does happen and yes it-it-you know kids do end up you know one is right on the edge of the age and one is right on the edge of the age yes it does happen
Stossel-- They get put on the registry with 40 year old rapists
Petra Luna-- yeah but what are you gonna do? I mean its too bad that they have those things going on but its a necessary evil
Then, of course, AZU offers up this little gem:
"Watch for someone who defends an 18 year old for having sex with a 14 year old, then when asked the question "Would you have done it if she had been 12?" the response being "Oh NO, absolutely not, there must be a 'line' somewhere" Completely overlooking the fact that there WAS a line and it was crossed.
All those things are known as spin. Those are things you need to watch out for. Spin is an unethical manipulation of factual information to make something appear to mean something that in reality it does not mean.Spin is evil.Spin is enabling behavior.The Antis won't stand for it."
So AZU recognizes that the 18 year old having sexual contact with his 14 year old girlfriend on the 20/20 show was crossing a line. You have to watch for someone who defends this behavior. But yet, Mark Lunsford just did the same thing, stating his 18 year old son french kissing and fondling a 14 year old, and AZU is amazingly quiet about the issue.
"Hasn't the Lundsford family been through enough?" Daydreamer of Oz
So let me get this straight. You CONDEMNED Patty Wetterling, who has NEVER received closure for a kidnapped son, claiming she has a sex offender son. But Mark Lunsford has "suffered enough." If you goggle Patty Wetterling, you find no scandals attached to her name. However, if you google Mark Lunsfords name, a number of controversies will come up:
- Child Porn on his computer
- Questionable use of funds and gifts to the Jessica Marie Lunsford Foundation
- His recent lawsuit diected at the sheriff
- And don't forget the defense of his son after charged with a sex offense
Yet, they lambaste someone for questioning Lunsford's motives:
******* is a complete Sociopath and her recent actions illustrate just how "reformed" she is.What a sick example of psychology she is, attacking the parents of children who were murdered and sexually abused; harassing, threatening and libeling innocent people with allegations of child pornography and child molestation. Someone so senseless and devoid of boundaries belongs in either a prison or a mental hospital.jacey
Petra Luna's chief space cadet denounces anti-Lunsford sites, and states its perfectly okay to be involved in controversy.
"I don’t know anyone named Josh Junsford. But if you’re talking about Josh Lunsford he’s a perfect example of how very few people are put on the sex offender registry for having teenaged sex."
Well VigilantAnti, do you know him or not? Its not like it wasn't mentioned in every true crime, RSO, and curent events blog in the country
So why is it Lunsford hasn't been dragged through the ringer like they have done to so many others? Maybe this is the reason:
WASP "Women Against Sexual Predators" A new and vibrant proactive subcommittee called WASP has been added to the Jessica Marie Lunsford Foundation.For more information.Please contact Penny Verde at email@example.com or call 1.888.4jmllaw
Yep. Tracy Golden (WASP Ohio) is connected to Lunsford, Tracy is also connected to AZU. AZU is connected to PJ and Wikisposure. WASP Ohio contributes to both places. Xavier Von Erck posts comments at AZ. The sites link to one another very intimately, refer to each other, etc.
AZU warns us about people who defend 18 year olds who mess with 14 year olds, but they stand by their man Lunsford. Sounds a bit like hypocrisy to me. Either you CONDEMN an action or you DENOUNCE an action. Will AZU continue to stand by Mark Lunsford?
Hypocrisy is evil.
Hypocrisy is enabling behavior.
The anti-antis won't stand for it!
Thursday, May 1, 2008
It is no fun when you get a taste of our own medicine, is it now? For months you have attacked people whose only "crime" was speak out against a series of oppressive laws directed at former offenders. You mock their looks. You laugh at their plight. You call them "pedoheads/freaks," do silly videos and posts at your site and work hand in hand with the PJ cult. You put activists against these oppressive laws or anyone who isn't as zealous as you in killing all sex offenders in the same breath as NAMBLA and Boy/Girl love or whatever the hell its called (apparently you guys spend a lot of time there).
Anyways, your hypersensitivity has led you to some interesting observations. You evade straight questions, opting instead to goad us into coming to your hate site. AZU has no helpful info, just hate and idiotic comments; sometimes I wonder if you make up the "enemies" that post there. You spin everything so much I wonder if you can read anything straight. Seriously, AZU needs professional help.
There are many people who have suffered all sorts of terrible things in their lives. It is sad, it is wrong and it is unfair. But that gives you NO RIGHT to project your anger onto others. That makes you a criminal no matter what your reasons are.
That being said, the only way Unites will disappear is when I see you stop attacking former offenders who are not re-offending. I will stop when you stop engaging in criminal harassment, stalking, and threatening others, infringing on their privacy, and chasing them all over the internet. Only then will I go away. If you put that effort into teaching prevention and accountability rather than in trying to hurt others, we would be far closer to a solution to reducing sexual violence in America. Instead, you take the low road, harassing and trying to intimidate others. You tricks don't work with me. I am not intimidated by you.
AZUnites merely does what you have done to others. Isn't not so fun now is it? If it hurt you, imagine what it has done to others. But that's how I see what you do. You hurt others, for what reasons, I don't care. Its no excuse. Bottom line, when you straighten up and become the victim advocate you CLAIM to be rather than the cyberthugs you are, then I'll be happy to call a truce. Until then AZUnites! is here to stay.
Monday, April 28, 2008
In response to an article in which the FBI plans to monitor suspected cyerterrorist activity, AZU alum Daydreamer of Oz offers up this idiotic statement:
Post subject: Re: FBI wants widespread monitoring of illegal Internet activity
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:49 pm
"I don't have a problem with it because I do not engage in illegal activity."
OH REALLY? Then what's this?
"Kruska v. Perverted Justice Foundation Incorporated.Org et al
Plaintiff Kruska sued Perverted Justice Foundation Incorporated (www.corporatesexoffenders.com and wikisposure project), Xavier Von Erck a/k/a Phillip John Eide, Christopher Brocious (absolutezerounited.blogspot.com, absolutezerounited.com and absolutezerounited.org), Barbara W. Ochoa a/k/a Petra Luna, Filmax Inc. (www.jankruska.com and www.jankruska.net), April Butler, David M. Butler, Godaddy.com, Bob Parsons, and MySpace.com. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin Defendants from posting on their website claims that Plaintiff is a predator, pedophile, child molester and pro-pedophile. Plaintiff also charges defendants with intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, cyberstalking and violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act."
Absolute Zero United is among the organizations implicated in a FEDERAL LAWSUIT for CYBERTERRORISM! A lawsuit they will LOSE! WOW! Its like the kid with frosting on his face, afer ask him, "Did you get into the cake?" he says with his mouthful of cake, "MMM-NO"
This is just too funny for words!
Funny. Stitches 77 claims it was WASP Ohio whoposted some crap about me on their trollspot earlier in the year. WASP Ohio claimes it was Stitches 77. I say they're ALL guilty. That means YOU, Ozzie-boy
Saturday, April 26, 2008
"Antis:" How AZU identifies themselves. "Anti" is short for "antisocial," which is fitting when you consider their approach to anyone who doesn't agree with them, even a district attorney.
On Jan. 12, 2008, Stitches 77 says, "I could care less what an Iowa attorney says or ANY attorney for that matter." (http://www.robheri.com/2008/01/every-decent-human-being-is-this-world.html)-- The "Iowa attorneys" she was referring to was the Iowa County Attorneys Association, the group of PROSECUTING attorneys in that state. Disregard for legal authority is a hallmark of APD.
"Pedo Enablers:" Anyone who disagrees with their view of "kill all sex offenders." If you are not condemning them to death, you are enabling them. If you call for reform, you are enabling. If you are not aggressive enough in condemning them you are enabling them. Somehow, they came to the belief that calling for reforms to make sex offenders legislation sensible and promoting stuff like prevention and education, you are somehow excusing sex crimes. Remember, I've already noted in previous threads, Patty Wetterling and The Pope were among the list of "pedo enablers."
Ironically, the real definition of "enabling" is encouraging an action through support or creating an environment conducive to behavior. Ironically, the AZU harass/annoy/stress gameplan creates such an environment.
"Spin:" Essentially any interpretation of a study or stat that disagrees with their interpretations of it. Ironically, they are adept at having interesting intepretations of what people say. After all, they turned the Pope's message of healing for victims of the church's sex scandal into a blame game rant. Which brings me to:
"Blame Gamers:" Anyone who suggests anything for the healing process except cold revenge; also means any former offender who speaks out against oppressive sex offender laws.
"Victim Bashing:" Attacking, criticizing, or questioning any of their words or actions, even if you are doing so in self-defense from their actions. Somehow AZU thinks being a victim or a victim advocate gives them license to hurt others. And their favorite:
"Denial:" Anyone non-submissive to their whims. If you speak up against sex offender laws, you are in "denial." Guess they forgot SO laws aren't SUPPOSED to be punishment. Dumbasses.
Eventually I may add more to this as the need arises.
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Didn't your momma teach you not to leave your toys lying around the house? Did your mom have an affinity for KFC by chance? You just got have an uncanny resemblance to the Colonel.
Oh, and don't ever tell me absolute zero and perverted justice aren't connected. Nobody's buying that crap! Besides, you werekind enough to post it up on your Spew-Tube account.
Don't hate the playa hate the game!
FOR SALE BY OWNER: One slightly used website available for immediate purchase and release. A great rehab property, needs fresh paint. This site is HOT!
It seems http://www.absolutezerounited.org/ has retired. They must've decided to stop wasting their efforts helping victims of abuse overcome from and heal from the crimes committed against them, and instead focus on committing crimes against others they feel are "pedoheads" and "pedo enablers." Of interesting note, they only had 70 visitors on average. Guess not everyone's into committing crimes against others.
Considering the growth of lawsuits against them, they better hope it fetches a good price LOL!
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
The idea to create this site came a week ago, after so many people were harassed by members of Absolute Zero United, some of their targets figured the only way to show them how foolish they are is to create a counter site. Thus, Absolute Zero Unites was born.
For a week or so now, I have posted under a derivative name of the poster to took it upon herself to attack me for my involvement in a civil rights rally. So "Stitches" and I took it upon ourselves to fight fire with fire, so to speak. Why not repost their words (unlike AZ, however, its fully resourced AND not taken out of context). Why not expose their illicit tactics, like they "expose" allegedly dangerous individuals (without the posting of names, phone numbers, etc). Why not call them out on THEIR lies, misconceptions, myths, and fallacies? This site may have been thought up with the intention of being a "spoof" of AZU, but Unites is still a site based on the facts.
What do I hope to achieve? Well, I hope AZU sees how foolish they are in doing what they do. If a person is a "clear and present danger" as they claim, then you should contact LE; instead they take the low road, doling out their own brand of justice. They justify what they do by dehumanizing their targets, which excuses their attacks in their own minds; they pore through all your posts in hopes to find something that can be misinterpreted so they can justify their attacks; they choose to be bitter and hurt people because they were hurt themselves or have a warped sense of justice, or possibly just like hurting people. And sex criminals are easy targets.
Whatever the reason, there is no justification for engaging in such activities as posting personal addresses, claiming you're a "pedohead/freak," calling you at 3 am, or creating defamatory videos about you because hey don't like you. That is stupid, childish, and most of all, illicit.
So it came to pass I ran into Stitches 77, Daydreamer of Oz, and Messy Medic (who is replacing WASP Ohio as my least favorite), on a "neutral" site called www.sexoffenderalliance.com. Anyways, they weren't too fond of this counter site and demand I take it down. Well I have a list of demands, so at the moment, I called a ceasefire to at least try to see what the hell their problem is. So they basically want me to not be active in my cause. Too bad, I can't do that. And their other demands are even less reasonable. Essentially they want me to be quiet and do and say what they want and then MAYBE they will do what I ask. I DON'T THINK SO!
Until I see changes in how the absolute zeroes operate, and that includes wholesale reform of their sites (yes that includes all affiliates and contributors), then there is a compelling interest in keeping this site open. I consider Absolute Zero United a "clear and present danger" to society and to former offenders whose only real crime of interest to AZ is being bold enough to speak out against these laws.
There is a single that describes AZU's tactics of slander, defamation, cyberstalking, cyberharassment, and bullying tactics. It's called "CRIMINAL." And Unites (derivative names and all) will exist as long as the need to expose AZU as the criminal organization they are.
PS: Don't dish out what you are unwilling to take, AZ!