The Lucifer Effect on Absolute Zero United

Ah, what a difference a week makes. I took a vacation, spent a wonderful Valentine's Day with my girlfriend and, well, just live life. Meanwhile, while I was out enjoying the sunshine and scenery without a single thought about the trolls at Absolute(ly) Zero (braincells), the AZholes "never sleeps."

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/absolutezero/3769064689703738483/#61373
I am an Anti and Anti's don't have time to sleep. -- Stitch-cunt
Stitches77 | 02.14.09 - 8:27 am |

It is no wonder they suffer from so many cognitive distortions down at Absolute Zero United. Perhaps that is why they see the devil in everything but themselves. But when you see evil in everything, and you spend your time looking for the devil, it really distorts your thinking.

Rather than the usual retort of AZU's spiel, noting they couldn't go a day without talking about me, I want to share something education. I'm sure as a consequence AZU members won't read this, then.

Does anyone remember the "Stanford Prison Experiment?" --"The Stanford Prison experiment cast students as prison guards and inmates in a fake prison environment. It had to be terminated when the students bought into their roles so much that the guards started abusing the inmates and the inmates started to riot."

--http://scienceblogs.com/purepedantry/2008/06/the_psychology_of_evil.php--

In the famous Stanford Prison experiment, the mock prison guards were given the power and authority over the mock inmates. One of the psychological tactics employed by the mock guards was the "dehumanization" of the enemy. By seeing the mock inmates as somehow less than human, the mock guards committed atrocious acts against the mock inmates, including even mock homosexual acts and physical abuse. Some guards consumed by their roles they were upset when the experiment closed after only six days. The conclusion is that the situation caused the behavior ("Situational Ethics/ attributions") rather than any predispositions of the guards, as they were thoroughly screened. [see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment]. Hence, Zimbardo has deemed this the "Lucifer Effect."

Absolute Zero United suffers from this same effect. Whatever noble cause they professed to engage in has devolved into casting pretty much everyone but themselves as evil. I'm sure along the way they sucked in a few people looking to legitimately combat pedophilia. And the anonymous internet gives them a power they could never obtain in the free world. But in "never sleeping," reading hours upon days upon weeks of "boy-chat" or "girl-chat" sites, NAMBLA, or whatever other illicit sites they pop into these days, it obviously has this effect on them. Coupled with man's tendency to generalize, we find AZU finds evil in pretty much everyone, even a woman who lost a child and helped create one of the first national sex offender laws in the country:

http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/04/biting-off-more-than-they-can-chew.html

Absolute Zero Members have admitted to dehumanizing their targets:
http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/04/overt-dehumanization.html

Stitch-cunt admits that she sees all sex offenders the same (except for her pet RSO Static -- hope she put on his flea collar and walked him today LOL):
http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/04/overt-dehumanization.html

As a result, AZU feels justified by demonizing everyone that does not buy into their "kill all sex offenders" mentality. Below is a review of some of the effects of their distorted thinking:

1. AZU promotes vigilante violence. Stitch-Cunt takes it one step further by suggesting if you disprove of vigilante violence you are a pedo yourself:
http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/05/azu-encourages-vigilantism-so-does.html

2. Stitches states that even Romeo and Juliet offenders should be dehumanized (unless, of course, we're talking about Mark Lunsford):
http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/05/common-thread.html

3. AZU claims to detest sex crimes, but sees no problem promoting rape or mutilation of their victims:
http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/10/azu-gets-off-on-thoughts-of-rape-deep.html
--and--
http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/08/too-weird-for-words.html

4. AZU, or in this instance, their sister hate group Perverted-Justice, is not beyond exploiting a child's death for financial gain (note the case has nothing to do with a sex offender):
http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/10/perverted-zeroes-trying-to-cash-in-on.html

That is just a few of the issues surrounding the mindset of Absolute Zero United. Unlike them, I take the time to go out and enjoy life. Perhaps that is why I can see the good in people. You'll never really see anything but hate and mockery at AZU. That is why you see the same here. AZUnites IS merely a mirror of AZU after all.

Trouble In AZU Paradise

A funny thing happened on the way to Absolute Zero United today...

I haven't been visiting them lately because I have a life, but I thought I'd breeze through the site to see what I missed. And what I saw today had me laughing so hard I almost fell out of my chair! It seems a noob has entered the criminal-den, trying to suck up to the established cyber-criminals, with disasterous results LOL:

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/absolutezero/3027388666207502371/
(The comments from "chalk one up for the pedos")

I have a theory- nay, a DREAM- that the Z in ZandJsmom stands for "Zandir." Mrs. Drejaj, is that you? lameo 06.26.08 - 4:26 pm

I suggest you apologize to me immediately, Lameo. How dare you insinuate that I am at all connected to this piece of filth. Stitches for one knows full well who and where I am. Bite me.ZandJsMom 06.26.08 - 7:33 pm

I expect the apology to come quickly. That was over the top. ZandJsMom has history here.Stitchesstitches77 Homepage 06.26.08 - 7:42 pm

"I have a theory- nay, a DREAM- that the Z in ZandJsmom stands for "Zandir." Mrs. Drejaj, is that you?"See how quickly the antis turn against you.You fucking moron.zandir Homepage 06.26.08 - 7:59 pm (NOTE: ROTLFMAO!)

People, I am sorry for any harm or damage I might have caused for what was a scare tactic targeted at a pedophile and not a personal attack. Also, I am sorry about a passing statement that is now being used to pick apart my character. It was simply my opinion on one thing which in no way indicates an opposition to the purpose of AZU or anti-pedophilia activism, WHICH I AM A PART OF.lameo 06.26.08 - 8:02 pm (NOTE: So here is the apology, but catch ZandJ'smom's reply-- obviously hukd on fonix didn't wurk 4 her!)

Still waiting on that apology here, LAMEo. ZandJsMom 06.26.08 - 8:14 pm (NOTE: imagine that-- me agreeing with an anti. Maybe with this miracle, I can turn lead into gold too!)

Oh, and did you just call me a "fool?" What are you, a YuGiOh villain? lameo 06.26.08 - 8:20 pm (I'm sure most of the AZholes are indeed villains, too bad unlike YuGiOh cards, are entirely worthless)

It pretty much goes on back to their original intent of harassing people from there but i was nice to read a few lines of trouble in paradise.

Oh and the while blasting a politician:

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/absolutezero/3426745245933862473/
Commenting on "I'm going to rip them apart")

YOU GUYS, READ THIS-I hate to admit this, but I have just found out that this quote is, fortunately, taken out of context. He was speaking about the welfare of children who have to testify. Now I look like an idiot for writing about it and making all my friends read.

I'm not yelling at you for not doing your homework, but please read this. lameo 06.26.08 - 5:45 pm (NOTE: OMG! Lameo just committed the cardinal sin! He actually told azu they DIDN'T DO THEIR HOMEWORK!!!! ROTFLMAO!)

lameo nothing was taken out of context. The passage you quoted means exactly the same as the one quoted in the post.As we've explained numerous times to so many pedos, a quote can only be taken out of context if it takes on a different meaning.It truly troubles me that you're having a problem understanding this. Daydreamer of Oz 06.26.08 - 6:30 pm (NOTE: This coming from the idiot that called the Pope a pedo-enabler)

Really? I'm definitely seeing a different meaning there. He's saying that children shouldn't be interrogated. lameo 06.26.08 - 6:39 pm

Really? I'm definitely seeing a different meaning there.I'm not. He's still saying he'll "rip kids apart" and he's still saying he will defend his clients more vehemently if they're facing a life sentence as opposed to any other sentence.He's saying that children shouldn't be interrogated.He didn't say that at all.Daydreamer of Oz 06.26.08 - 6:54 pm (NOTE: Yeah- that's what defense attorneys are Supposed to do, Dumbasser of Oz)

"Okay, let's agree to disagree. I am obviously fighting for the same things as you guys"I don't know any such thing at all. You're making some very iffy remarks that disturb me.Stitches stitches77 06.26.08 - 7:35 pm (NOTE: Yeah, we know truth make you iffy, Bitches of the seventy and seven brain cells)

Okay, that's a little much. I am a victim and a survivor who has been on this board fighting vehemently against pedophiles. I simply interpret that one quote differently. I am certainly not arguing with the fact your interpretation makes Fagan a degenerate. It's not that big of a deal and certainly no reason to question my intentions, which, by the way, breaks my heart. lameo 06.26.08 - 7:42 pm (NOTE: Awww poor Lame-o. Didn't you know Bitches likes people to brown nose and enable her LIES? Stick with YuGiOh cards, dude)

"which, by the way, breaks my heart."Imagine how ZandJsMom's felt Stitches stitches77 Homepage 06.26.08 - 7:46 pm (NOTE: Apparently elephants and skank hos never forget. Guess what? She will bring this up in 2068, when you're in the nursing home too)

I can't believe I'm being vilified. This is ridiculous. I am one of you. I'm not arguing against any of your principles or ANYTHING. I just disagreed with the interpretation of ONE QUOTE. You are making a mountain of a mole hill. lameo 06.26.08 - 7:54 pm

"which, by the way, breaks my heart."Imagine how ZandJsMom's felt"Thank you Stitches, I appreciate that. Rather though than being heartbroken by being insulted by a pedophile or one of their sympathizers, its more a feeling of revulsion, like when a nasty insect skitters over your shoe.ZandJsMom 06.26.08 - 7:54 pm (NOTE: So lameo is a "pedo sympathizer" because lameo hurt the feelings of one of the AZholes. Now you know what it takes to be a pedo enabler in the eyes of AZU, my friends)

" I can't believe I'm being vilified. This is ridiculous. I am one of you"That remains to be seen. You can't even decide where you are or if you're male or female. Maybe that's why you flip-flop Stitches stitches77 Homepage 06.26.08 - 8:02 pm (NOTE: I recall stitchbitch was defending a homosexual not too long ago. Stitches flip flops on more issues than Barack Osama)

I can't? I've never claimed to be either. And as for the first part? Fine. lameo 06.26.08 - 8:10 pm

You gotta love these kinds of exchanges. No honor among thieves. Keep them coming, you filthy AZU douchebags!

The Common Thread

Today, I thought we'd play a fun game. Anyone who knows me knows I'm not a fan of Mark Lunsford. Well, if you haven't heard, Lunsford's 18 year old son, Joshua, was arrested for sexual conduct with a 14 year old girl. Now Lunsford speaks out AGAINST "Romeo and Juliets" (where he never did before) being sex offenses.



http://www.northcountrygazette.org/2007/05/31/jessica-lunsford%E2%80%99s-brother-accused-of-sex-crime/





Court records indicate that the teenager allegedly put his hands down the pants of his 14-year-old girlfriend while they were kissing. Because the alleged incidents occurred less than two months after Joshua turned 18, he has been charged with a fourth degree felony.
The girl’s father pleaded guilty earlier this year to trying to choke Joshua.
Mark Lunsford has been quoted as saying that his son’s arrest doesn’t compare with the pedophiles whom he has helped to put in prison. “We’re talking about Romeo and Juliet here, not some 36-year-old pervert following around a 10-year-old”, Lunsford told a Florida newspaper. He is not the boy’s custodial parent and the boy does not live with him.
When asked how he felt about his son being labeled a sex offender if he was convicted, Lunsford said that “we have to learn to distinguish between Romeo and Juliet and a predator. We need to redefine the term ‘sex offender’, not ‘predator’”.

I brought this up not to debate that issue. I want you to compare that to the comments AZU mmber Petra Luna made on 20/20 back on March 14, 2008 (The corrupted- justice link is a transcript of the segment):



http://www.abcnews.go.com/2020/Stossel (go to videos, look for "Vigilante Justice")



http://www.corrupted-justice.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=9204



Stossel-- Arent some people on the registries kids who at age 16 had sex with another kid?

Peta Luna-- [rolls eyes] Yeah [sighs and shifts in chair] but that's not very likely, but it does happen and yes it-it-you know kids do end up you know one is right on the edge of the age and one is right on the edge of the age yes it does happen

Stossel-- They get put on the registry with 40 year old rapists

Petra Luna-- yeah but what are you gonna do? I mean its too bad that they have those things going on but its a necessary evil



Then, of course, AZU offers up this little gem:



http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2008/03/common-thread.html



"Watch for someone who defends an 18 year old for having sex with a 14 year old, then when asked the question "Would you have done it if she had been 12?" the response being "Oh NO, absolutely not, there must be a 'line' somewhere" Completely overlooking the fact that there WAS a line and it was crossed.



All those things are known as spin. Those are things you need to watch out for. Spin is an unethical manipulation of factual information to make something appear to mean something that in reality it does not mean.Spin is evil.Spin is enabling behavior.The Antis won't stand for it."



So AZU recognizes that the 18 year old having sexual contact with his 14 year old girlfriend on the 20/20 show was crossing a line. You have to watch for someone who defends this behavior. But yet, Mark Lunsford just did the same thing, stating his 18 year old son french kissing and fondling a 14 year old, and AZU is amazingly quiet about the issue.

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/absolutezero/5807725979958780816/

"Hasn't the Lundsford family been through enough?" Daydreamer of Oz

So let me get this straight. You CONDEMNED Patty Wetterling, who has NEVER received closure for a kidnapped son, claiming she has a sex offender son. But Mark Lunsford has "suffered enough." If you goggle Patty Wetterling, you find no scandals attached to her name. However, if you google Mark Lunsfords name, a number of controversies will come up:

• Child Porn on his computer
• Questionable use of funds and gifts to the Jessica Marie Lunsford Foundation
• His recent lawsuit diected at the sheriff
• And don't forget the defense of his son after charged with a sex offense

Yet, they lambaste someone for questioning Lunsford's motives:

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/absolutezero/5193128263467108490/

******* is a complete Sociopath and her recent actions illustrate just how "reformed" she is.What a sick example of psychology she is, attacking the parents of children who were murdered and sexually abused; harassing, threatening and libeling innocent people with allegations of child pornography and child molestation. Someone so senseless and devoid of boundaries belongs in either a prison or a mental hospital.jacey

http://imposteralert.blogspot.com/search/label/Mark%20Lunsford

Petra Luna's chief space cadet denounces anti-Lunsford sites, and states its perfectly okay to be involved in controversy.

http://vigilantantis.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/andrew-“billy”-berg-repeat-sex-offender-child-predator-released-into-the-community/

"I don’t know anyone named Josh Junsford. But if you’re talking about Josh Lunsford he’s a perfect example of how very few people are put on the sex offender registry for having teenaged sex."

Well VigilantAnti, do you know him or not? Its not like it wasn't mentioned in every true crime, RSO, and curent events blog in the country

So why is it Lunsford hasn't been dragged through the ringer like they have done to so many others? Maybe this is the reason:

http://206.130.112.50/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/archive/JMLFoundation/20060709133402/

WASP "Women Against Sexual Predators" A new and vibrant proactive subcommittee called WASP has been added to the Jessica Marie Lunsford Foundation.For more information.Please contact Penny Verde at usa4jmllaw@yahoo.com or call 1.888.4jmllaw

Yep. Tracy Golden (WASP Ohio) is connected to Lunsford, Tracy is also connected to AZU. AZU is connected to PJ and Wikisposure. WASP Ohio contributes to both places. Xavier Von Erck posts comments at AZ. The sites link to one another very intimately, refer to each other, etc.

AZU warns us about people who defend 18 year olds who mess with 14 year olds, but they stand by their man Lunsford. Sounds a bit like hypocrisy to me. Either you CONDEMN an action or you DENOUNCE an action. Will AZU continue to stand by Mark Lunsford?

Hypocrisy is evil.

Hypocrisy is enabling behavior.

The anti-antis won't stand for it!

Daydreamer of Oz-- Dumbass In Denial

http://forums.sexoffenderalliance.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1605

In response to an article in which the FBI plans to monitor suspected cyerterrorist activity, AZU alum Daydreamer of Oz offers up this idiotic statement:

daydreamerofoz
Post subject: Re: FBI wants widespread monitoring of illegal Internet activity
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:49 pm

"I don't have a problem with it because I do not engage in illegal activity."

OH REALLY? Then what's this?

http://news.justia.com/cases/featured/arizona/azdce/2:2008cv00054/366532/

"Kruska v. Perverted Justice Foundation Incorporated.Org et al

Plaintiff Kruska sued Perverted Justice Foundation Incorporated (www.corporatesexoffenders.com and wikisposure project), Xavier Von Erck a/k/a Phillip John Eide, Christopher Brocious (absolutezerounited.blogspot.com, absolutezerounited.com and absolutezerounited.org), Barbara W. Ochoa a/k/a Petra Luna, Filmax Inc. (www.jankruska.com and www.jankruska.net), April Butler, David M. Butler, Godaddy.com, Bob Parsons, and MySpace.com. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin Defendants from posting on their website claims that Plaintiff is a predator, pedophile, child molester and pro-pedophile. Plaintiff also charges defendants with intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, cyberstalking and violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act."

Absolute Zero United is among the organizations implicated in a FEDERAL LAWSUIT for CYBERTERRORISM! A lawsuit they will LOSE! WOW! Its like the kid with frosting on his face, afer ask him, "Did you get into the cake?" he says with his mouthful of cake, "MMM-NO"

This is just too funny for words!

Funny. Stitches 77 claims it was WASP Ohio whoposted some crap about me on their trollspot earlier in the year. WASP Ohio claimes it was Stitches 77. I say they're ALL guilty. That means YOU, Ozzie-boy

The Show Must Go On

For four long months, I have endured the worst Absolute Zero United has to offer, including the mock blogspots, the videos mocking me, the Wikisposure page calling me a pedophile. False accusations. Slander. Cyberstalking (don't tell me googling your screen name for the sole purpose of telling everyone you're a "pedohead" is not cyberstalking, especially when you've done it numerous times). Phone calls at 3 am. My evidence file has grown in Megs over those four months.

The idea to create this site came a week ago, after so many people were harassed by members of Absolute Zero United, some of their targets figured the only way to show them how foolish they are is to create a counter site. Thus, Absolute Zero Unites was born.

For a week or so now, I have posted under a derivative name of the poster to took it upon herself to attack me for my involvement in a civil rights rally. So "Stitches" and I took it upon ourselves to fight fire with fire, so to speak. Why not repost their words (unlike AZ, however, its fully resourced AND not taken out of context). Why not expose their illicit tactics, like they "expose" allegedly dangerous individuals (without the posting of names, phone numbers, etc). Why not call them out on THEIR lies, misconceptions, myths, and fallacies? This site may have been thought up with the intention of being a "spoof" of AZU, but Unites is still a site based on the facts.

What do I hope to achieve? Well, I hope AZU sees how foolish they are in doing what they do. If a person is a "clear and present danger" as they claim, then you should contact LE; instead they take the low road, doling out their own brand of justice. They justify what they do by dehumanizing their targets, which excuses their attacks in their own minds; they pore through all your posts in hopes to find something that can be misinterpreted so they can justify their attacks; they choose to be bitter and hurt people because they were hurt themselves or have a warped sense of justice, or possibly just like hurting people. And sex criminals are easy targets.

Whatever the reason, there is no justification for engaging in such activities as posting personal addresses, claiming you're a "pedohead/freak," calling you at 3 am, or creating defamatory videos about you because hey don't like you. That is stupid, childish, and most of all, illicit.

So it came to pass I ran into Stitches 77, Daydreamer of Oz, and Messy Medic (who is replacing WASP Ohio as my least favorite), on a "neutral" site called www.sexoffenderalliance.com. Anyways, they weren't too fond of this counter site and demand I take it down. Well I have a list of demands, so at the moment, I called a ceasefire to at least try to see what the hell their problem is. So they basically want me to not be active in my cause. Too bad, I can't do that. And their other demands are even less reasonable. Essentially they want me to be quiet and do and say what they want and then MAYBE they will do what I ask. I DON'T THINK SO!

Until I see changes in how the absolute zeroes operate, and that includes wholesale reform of their sites (yes that includes all affiliates and contributors), then there is a compelling interest in keeping this site open. I consider Absolute Zero United a "clear and present danger" to society and to former offenders whose only real crime of interest to AZ is being bold enough to speak out against these laws.

There is a single that describes AZU's tactics of slander, defamation, cyberstalking, cyberharassment, and bullying tactics. It's called "CRIMINAL." And Unites (derivative names and all) will exist as long as the need to expose AZU as the criminal organization they are.

PS: Don't dish out what you are unwilling to take, AZ!

Oh My God! AZU calls Pope a Pedo Enabler!

http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/search/label/Catholic%20Church

So Pope Benedict XVI is added to the growing list of people considered "pedophile enablers." As mother would say, "Holy Mackrel!" Can you say BLASPHEMY? Read their "spin" on the papal address regarding the sex abuse scandal: (PS thanks to Daydreamer of Oz for this gem, what a veitible mine of stupidity)


Ozzie: What does this remind you of?

Pope: What does it mean to speak of child protection when pornography and violence can be viewed in so many homes through media widely available today?

Ozzie: Read: Its society's fault when a pedophile molests a kid because after all pornography and violence can be seen in the media.


Warped Ohio's take: The Pope has made a keen observation, that American obsession with all things sexual creates an environment conducive to illicit sexual behavior. Glorifying illicit sexual behavior ("Stiffler's mom, yeah") is not an excuse, but it is an observation that we saturate ourselves with this smut with, while simultaneously neglecting to educate our kids about what is acceptable sexual behavior.

Pope: Those who "have experienced shame over what has occurred" deserve guidance and support.

Ozzie: Read: Its the offenders we need to focus on and stop worrying about those pesky victims.

Oh Yes, Ozzie, lets focus on former offenders, lets forget about helping crime victims recover from harm so they don't spend their loves in bitterness and blind hatred, like you. NOT! You need to spend less time Daydreaming and spend more time in reality. Lets see, the Pope spends time talking to SNAP, looking to find a way to find a way to make reparations for what the American church system had done, and wants to offer them guidance and support to help abuse victims deal with the hurt. Ozzie apparently doesn't seem to understand that many times, the VICTIMS feel shame over what has happened. For a guy in a group claiming to be a voice for the children, Ozzie has little grasp on the concept of the shame people feel when abused.

AZU stated in a recent post up on their site, "spin is evil... the antis won't stand for it." Spin is evil? You just spun quite a web yourself.