Xavier Von Erck from Perverted Justice still offers up a heaping pile of BS in his reasons for backing off of harassing anti-registry activists

Somehow, von Jerk flew this under our radar, but it is god for a giggle. He claims his group backed off of what he called "pedophile activism" (which obviously included legal reformists which had nothing to do with age of consent laws) because of "a nice string" of alleged victories. In reality, they backed off because workuing with real LE means they could no longer engage in criminal activity, like harassment and slander.

Not much else to say about this but to have a chuckle at Von Jerk's expense. Well that and being shocked the rat man popped up in this decade at all.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/7bd37e/whatever-happened-to-nambla

According to Von Erck, his group of internet activists have lost interest in NAMBLA. "We shuttered our spin-off that was dedicated to exposing pedophile activists some years ago after a nice string of exposures, arrests, and convictions," he told me.

Level 2 Michigan sex offender Shaun Webb supports yet another "Anti" website

Because Shaun Webb needs reminding about how those he thinks are his allies really feel about him. 

The 300 pound self-loathing crybaby sex offender Shaun WAAAHHHHHbb has taken his personal feud to continuous lows the more he opens his fat mouth. After a one month absence, I returned to this blog to find yet another barrage of Shaun Webb's shitposting, this time attacking a reader who is posting stories of vigilante violence in the comments section. As usual, I flag his shitposts as spam because he's just an attention whore. 

You see, Shaun Webb comes here to this page, leaves a number of shitposts, then waits for a response so he can act like a victim and claim I'm bullying him. However, time stamps don't lie:

I generally don't post his nonsense because his rants are as incoherent and full of grammar errors as his self-published drivel. On 9/12 I was too busy preparing for the RSOL Conference to even check the comments (obviously, comments here are moderated because trolls get no voice here), so I never noticed these comments were in queue until the 20th. 

On the 14th, as I headed out to the conference in Atlanta to meet up with fellow activists and indulge in some fried Alligator, Shaun Webb, being the unimaginative prick that he is, decided to update my personal information on the Anti site "Encyclopedia Dramatica" under the name "Codywest481." (You see, this is why he is so unimaginative-- he signs up using the name of his dog, Cody, as well as the last name of the alias "West" he gave himself when writing about his conviction in "A Motion For Innocence." 

Seriously, the best name you could devise was "Cody" (your dog) West (your alias in your shitty book)"?

Shaun's obsession with me gets worse and worse with every insane rant he makes. And so he claims yet again, in spite of his constant spamming of MY blog and the fact he stooped low enough to update Encyclopedia Dramatica's Evil Unveiled shitpost with my current address and a few of Shaun's choice lies, that i'm the one obsessed with him. Speaking of shitposting and obsession, here is a brief breakdown of Shaun Webb's shitposting:

Days in 2016 containing at least one Shaun Webb shitpost-- 35

Number of total shitposts for 2016 to date-- 77

Date with most shitposts-- May 29 (9 shitposts)

That's an awful lot of shitposting by a sad, pathetic 300 pound pile of bovine excrement. But yet, he wants to claim I'm obsessed with him because once a month, i respond to him, mostly to call him out on a lie. Here is a good lie he was busted on, for example:

Lets see, according to WAAHHHHbb, I received no "press," so ABC 10 (twice) and Courthouse News Service was hacked and cleverly edited to put me in the story, I take it. I somehow cloned Lilia Luciano of ABC 10 Sacramento and had her sneak into the building and replace footage without me with footage of me. And I photoshopped myself into the video Peter Griffin style. Riiiiight. Okay then. 

Oh, and don't forget that time he claims he got me kicked off Dr Drew:

Maybe Dr. Drew cloned me or something. Who is obsessed with who? This blog exposes anti-Registrant trolls, even if that troll IS a registrant himself. Shaun Webb has now promoted both ED and Chuck Roderick's extortion sites on his blog. No doubt the bitch will hide this indiscretion once he realizes he is caught in yet another embarrassing situation, But I'll just leave this screenshot here so he can't claim he never made these posts. Shaun Webb is obsessed with me the same way his beloved Valigator was, and I suppose Shaun WAAHHHHHbb will be trying to conduct #OpDereksTears w/o the skank. 

LOL at the jealousy part, BTW. He has written half a dozen books but hadn't even sold more than a couple hundred books. I bet the authors at the RSOL Conference sold more books just at the conference than Webb has sold all year. Why he is obsessed with the one ebook I wrote a decade ago is beyond me, as is his unhealthy obsession with my weight (why he's obsessed with the number 270 is the same reason he uses the same screen names over and over-- Jody, Cody, and Marcie have been used numerous times). I haven't promoted my book in years and even offer it on my website for free, so why would I care about his silly book sales? I do know he had to max out his credit card to make ends meet, so he obviously isn't doing all that great. 

In regards to Amazon, Shaun WAAHHHbb lobbied hard to gets every bad review removed from the site, not just mine. No, my account was never suspended, despite his claims, but Shaun did pay a service to get the negative reviews removed. That's a lot of whining over a negative review for books ranked #1,698,097 (Lost Youth) and #2,971,090 (A Motion for Innocence) in Books on Amazon. What a joke. 

Botom line, Shaun WAAHHHHHbb is a 300+ pound whiny bitch who can't write and sucks at lying. Shaun, just retire already. Every time you try to take me on, I destroy you. 

Valigator and her imaginary friends have made me wait forever for their big surprise, yet they consistently fail to deliver

This is a very short post. The only reason I am writing this here is because Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst and her imaginary friend on her shit blog have continued making idle threats against me, and I challenged them to meet me in person. Obviously Val and imaginary friend won't do it. 

I'd like to remind Valerie and her imaginary friend of a few facts:

1. I've gotten the same lame threat for years. Supposedly I'm supposed to have gotten a "big surprise" of some sort since 2008. I'm STILL waiting for this big surprise. Glad I never held my breath on that one.  Well, the asshole was right about one thing, I'd "never see him coming"... because he was afraid to show up! LOL.
2. Valigaturd claims she wrote my neighbors letters a couple of years ago and they were up in arms, but when I asked all my neighbors about these alleged letters, not one neighbor received anything. Proof or it never happened!
3. Valigaturd tried to make people think she went to Tallahassee to see me "crash and burn" at the Rally in Tally, and claims she only saw "four people" there. Obviously she wasn't there nor can she count, and since my counter-rally got equal attention with the Lauren Book walk, to make the claim my rally was a failure is to admit the Lauren Book bash was a failure. 
4. The only time I can actually say Valigaturd actually tried sabotaging an event (the 2012 RSOL Conference in Albuquerque), it backfired miserably. 

So once again, Valigaturd and her imaginary friend is once again making implicit threats they can't back up. I will challenge them like I challenged that random Twitter twat that trash-talked me the other day-- SAY IT TO MY FACE OR DON'T SAY IT AT ALL. 

I know they won't accept because Valigaturd and her imaginary friend won't dare meet me in person. I will take it a step further. If the asshole who has been making idle threats since 2008 meets me in person, I'll fucking retire from the cause once and for all! I'll delete Once Fallen and all the useful info I have given to thousands of registered citizens. 

So what do you say, punks? Want to shut me up? Meet me in person. That's all you have to do. No more "anonymous" messages. You know where I live, so as we used to say back in the day, nothing separates us but air and opportunity. 

It has been seven years so it is time to put up or shut up.

ADDENDUM: Well it seems Valigaturd's imaginary friend has vowed to start "hashtag OpDereksTears" on me. Yawn. At least this time they will be giving their failed operation a name. Only tears I'll be shedding is tears of laughter from laughing at Val and her imaginary friend's rage after failing once again! ROFLMAFAO!!!!

Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst gets called out for her lack of reading comprehension, then she plays fast and loose with the truth

Valerie Parkhurst aka Valigator, the career criminal now residing in Ft. Lauderdale, FL, is at it again. Earlier this year, AZUnites exposed Val's fraudulent GoFundMe campaign, as well as highlighted her admittance of using confirmation bias in her articles. 

Now, Val has continued the latest campaign of character assassination on her poorly designed, unreadable blog. 

In Valerie Parkhurst's personal obsession with me, she stumbled upon a Master's thesis written in 2011 and posted on the Kansas university scholarly works website. I never knew it existed, personally, but unlike Parkhurst, I'm not so obsessed with Derek Logue, I feel the need to constantly Google myself to see what people are writing about me. Val has a penchant for posting on comments Anti-Registry Movement activists have made as far back as 2009 in an attempt to start a fight. I guess she does not realize that rarely does one read comment sections of articles older than three days, so this strategy of hers does little but waste her time. But if she thinks leaving her droppings on a comment board from 2009 is the way to attack us, more power to her, I guess. 

This will be the only time anyone actually reads shit from her blog. 

So anyways, Val posted this 2011 thesis and proclaimed, "Seems this researcher put Derek Logue (like the bug he is) under glass and had not so glowing reviews about this freak. Funny thing after all these years, Derek doesn't link (anywhere) to this observation about him.."

Master's Theses are rarely published publicly, and when they are, they are not easily found, nor do researchers tend to notify people they are citing works beforehand. The researcher obviously obtained a copy of the Once Fallen eBook as part of his research. Thus, I was never aware of the research paper.

Somehow Valerie Parkhurst thought the article was attacking me much to her delight but the actual article was actually a discussion about how the myths of the American sex offender has negatively impacted the ability of the scientific community to effectively study strategies for reducing sexual abuse. The abstract of the article states the following: 

Sex offenders are the subjects of a discourse suggesting that they are “brutish, disgusting, primitive freaks” who are destined for recidivism. This discourse has provided the rationale for myriad laws designed to control sex offenders. However, these well-intentioned laws create negative outcomes for both sex offenders and society. This paper examines dominant sex offender discourse and discusses evidence that contradicts the prevailing assumptions about sex offenders. In so doing, it questions the efficacy and benefit of current sex offender laws and suggests alternative ways the U.S. can address the problem of child sexual abuse. -- p. iii

In regards to Gray's discussion of Once Fallen, I've included every instance below where Derek Logue/ Once Fallen is discussed in his research paper, entitled, "DEVIANCE AND DISCOURSE: CHILD MOLESTERS IN THE UNITED STATES" -- 

"Derek Logue operates a Web site called OnceFallen.com that advocates for sex offender rights and legislation reform, as well as provides resources for sex offenders after they have been released from incarceration. Derek Logue has also self-published a book about his crime. It is appropriate to use his real name because he is a public figure and his status as a sex offender is public knowledge. Derek’s inclusion in this essay will not reveal any information not already available from other sources." -- p. 11

"Derek Logue, a sex offender who became an activist for sex offender rights, says that sex offenders experience more physical harassment than suggested by Levenson and Cotter’s study. Logue’s assertion is anecdotal, but it is based on his personal experience and activism on behalf of sex offender rights. He argues that offenders are reluctant to report physical altercations out of fear police will blame them for instigating the fight. Logue also points out that sex offenders prefer to “fly under the radar” and avoid unnecessary dealings with law enforcement. It is difficult to judge the validity of Logue’s assertion based on Levenson and Cotter’s study, as the researchers were not affiliated with law enforcement. However, since the study was conducted in court-mandated counseling sessions, it is possible that the offenders worried that their interviews could eventually come to the attention of law enforcement. At least some people express a willingness to harm sex offenders, so it is possible Derek is correct." -- p. 37

"The social isolation, loss of civic identity, and lack of hope is thought to contribute to the risk of recidivism in sex offenders (Robbers 2009:11). Derek Logue expressed the same sentiment during my interview with him. He also wrote about it in his book Once Fallen (Logue 2009:4): “This label [registered sex offender] carries with it a ‘social death sentence’; sex offenders are considered the scourge of society, deserving of death, castration, concentration camps, and torture.” There are not any legal provisions allowing for the torture of sex offenders. Logue is reflecting his personal experience as a sex offender, which seems like civil or social torture to him. His past interferes with his current life. Finding gainful employment was a challenge: “During the next couple of months, I would face rejection after rejection after rejection. I tried offices, manual labor jobs, even fast food, to no avail.” (Logue 2009:24). He cannot live with his girlfriend or spend the night at her house because she has a minor son. (This may seem to be a common sense restriction, but Logue’s crime was against a female. Child molesters often have gender preferences.) Logue has even considered suicide." -- p. 42-43

This is hardly an attack on Derek Logue or Once Fallen, much less against the Anti-Registry Movement in general. In fact, Grey concludes that while he feels most existing laws should still be used to some extent (except residency restrictions) the laws should not apply to all offenders, and serious reforms need to be made to the dialogue regarding sex offender conversations. 

"If lawmakers and officials begin to counter the child molester rhetoric, some of the problems associated with sex offender laws might be alleviated." -- p. 77

"Not only must lawmakers and officials work to change the tone of the conversation about sex offenders, they must acknowledge that the legal system is overwhelmed with the requirements of sex offender control." -- p. 80

"There are alternative strategies for treating sex offenders with low-risk profiles and managing them in the community." -- p. 81

"Whatever reforms are implemented, the way forward will require courageous lawmakers to lead sober conversations that replace “tough on crime” rhetoric with honest evaluations of the effectiveness and essential fairness of the nation’s sex offender laws. A just society cannot tolerate the legal creation of a persistent underclass. Unfortunately, none of the current or recommended strategies prevents molestations in the first place. This remains a difficult area to address. It is impossible to remove risk entirely from children’s lives. My informant, Marshall, has a realistic perspective on the problem: “But I don’t know how effective the laws are in preventing what it is that they want to prevent. I think that the best prevention is good parenting. At the same time, you just can’t prevent some things." -- p. 82 

So now that I happily pointed out to Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst her error, she cranked up her BS meter to a higher level. She added an addendum to her shit-post, claiming, "Seems to Derek, he thinks this paper is an affirmation of his worthless positions and accuses me of interpreting it incorrectly. I personally think the guy is a hack, but his description of Logue and his background (""Additionally, one out of three victims who became abusers (Logue) had a history of being cruel to animals in their childhoods"""" (Bouvier 2003:446)."

So NOW Val thinks the researcher is a "hack" now that I made her realize that he is in favor of sex offender reforms. Not only that, but Val felt the need to play fast and loose with the written word by ADDING words into the article to make it sound like the researcher is attacking me. 

The actual article that Val claims is attacking me says this:

With a screenshot for added measure

"Though the mechanism that links past molestation with future crime is poorly understood, the study found that other factors in the victim’s history—like poor adult supervision, violence at home, or being abused by a female—were correlated with an increased risk of becoming an abuser. Additionally, one out of three victims who became abusers had a history of being cruel to animals in their childhoods (Bouvier 2003:446)." -- p. 15

Nowhere does the article associate that statement with Derek Logue/ Once Fallen. Val felt that if she added that one word in there to associate me with with a random statement she can somehow salvage the lie she stated by posting this research paper rather than admit that she does not know how to read a college-level report. 

Misreading advanced reading material is something Valerie Parkhurst tends to do on a consistent basis. In fact, I recently called her out on another bogus claim she made on her blog:

Not only did she credit the bogus 52% study to the wrong guy, she took it a step further by posting THE WRONG REPORT on her shit-blog. 

Apparently, when Valerie Parkhurst stated back on her shit-blog on January 4, 2015, "But I, as usual, look for data/opinions/conclusions that re-enforces my position on the issue and as predictable isnt (sic) hard to find," apparently she was lying about these studies being hard to find. But why point out the truth when you can just made things up and post it online, as Parkhurst and her online cohorts has been prone to do? After all, many people don't want to read an 82-page article, they want the Cliff Notes version. 

If Val ever decides to sell a 'Val's Notes" you better demand a refund. 

That pesky confirmation bias. 

A little refresher about Stitches 77 and her lies.

A couple of months ago I posted at AZU's blog, or, to use their language, I "hijacked" their blog. As usual, the same mentally handicapped people were there, and once again Stitches lies through her teeth.

No, her admittance she is not a victim advocate is not the lie, it is her denial of posing as a victim advocate that is a lie. After all, lies and distortions are her M.O.

As a matter of fact, the proof is still online:

 http://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release/child-activist-blog-says-absolute-zero-tolerance-for-pedophiles-45297.php

Trading advice within these support groups on the best ways to molest a child without getting caught, what instruments to use and much more is just the tip of the iceberg of what is being done on the internet. Absolute Zero United, a child activist blog that has a slew of contributors is now fighting back. One of the leaders in child activism is an individual who goes by the name of Stitches77. Regular contributor and co-founder of the blog Absolute Zero United, Stitches77 works diligently to expose these internet groups and draw attention to the insanely frightening things that go on within these groups....

Stitches77 and all of the other members of Absolute Zero United invite concerned parents and those who want to protect their children to visit the blog at http://www.absolutezerounited.blogspot.com to learn how to keep their children safe.

Absolute Zero United is a child activist group that works on keeping children safe on the internet and off the internet. For more information, visit http://www.absolutezerounited.blogspot.com

Stitches is a bold-faced lying cunt. After digging throughsome old screenshots, I see a lot of things she lied about. That reminds me, what happened to all these threats she made years ago?

Whatever happened to that Walsh/ Lunsford lawsuit? Just wondering if it was the same rumor mill where Stitches claimed she heard Patty Wetterling had a sex offender son.

 She needs a better network.

I'm still waiting for her to get "good and ready." Its only been YEARS! Coward. I did find ONE truthful comment, however:

AZU is dead. LOL

So they claim

Certain members of AZU claim to be victims of rapes, such as WASP Ohio and Violet Leaves. But where is the proof? How can we even believe AZU? After all, they do nothing but lie. About everything.

Stitchess 77 admits she lied... well, sort of

After nearly TWO LONG YEARS of asking, Stitches finally cracks that she pretty much made up the whole thing up about Patty Wetterling:

hXXp://www.haloscan.com/comments/absolutezero/6734383813849694069/?src=hsr#66983



So she admits attacking Patty Wetterling. She "read it somewhere?" Really? The only places I've read it in a Google search was comment board where Stitches posted it, at AZU, and at one of their sister sites. That's it.

hXXp://www.haloscan.com/comments/absolutezero/6734383813849694069/?src=hsr#67030

Essentially Stitches admits, at least half-heartedly, she attacked Patty Wetterling. The reason? Because Patty Wetterling stated we need to reform sex offender laws. You know, so your child doesn't land on a registry for having consensual relations. Thanks, Stitches, for admitting you're a big fat, liar. Makes us wonder what else you lie about. Like EVERYTHING!

Another example of AZU's lies- part 1,386,868

Like we need another example of AZU lies and propaganda. Over a year ago, an educational organization called SO Clear Media made a video response to a Portland news story on Wikisposure, a site which attacks people they claim are "pedophiles." In reality, Wikisposure is merely a site filled with more lies and propaganda, as well documented at this site. Below is the actual SO Clear video. I want you to pay close attention. SO Clear expresses how Wikisposure targets those groups who ARE NOT pedophiles, but activists calling for sex offender reform, as well as put those in danger by their false light, slanderous, and libellous comments:



Of course, the main point is to illustrate how AZU targets certain people AZU calls "pro-pedo" groups.  AZU's retort:

 

  

One thing AZU fails to mention is that SO Clear referred to the attacks on Wikisposure on THEM. Nowhere in the SO Clear Response did SO Clear mentions "Flickorna." ABSOLUTE ZERO mentions "Flickorna." That is called a "lie." AZU fails to mention not only does Wikisposue fail to tell the truth, they put people in danger by claiming they are active pedophiles and publishing their personal info, all the while talking about raping and murdering *ex offenders and "pedophiles."

Fun with Screenshots

Absolute Zero United uses "screenshots" in order to "prove" they are indeed telling the truth. To the average viewer, seeing is believing, right? If that's the case, then Stitches 77 has "turned over a new leaf" and follows ReFORM Radio:

Either she turned over a new leaf, or its merely possible someone set this whole thing up. You see, Perverted-Justice members and Absolute Zero United members post screen shots regularly, convincing the public these are legit. But any schmuck with 5 minutes and a little computer ingenuity can create a new account with a similar sounding screen name, make a post, take a screen shot, post it to Wikisposure/ AZU/ Pee-J and voila! Instant bullshit! Did I mention that some of the screenshot technology is compatible with Microsoft Applications like Paint or even Word? Think about it next time you read the lies at Wikidposers or AZU.

More on screenshot technology:

http://take-a-screenshot.org/
http://files.uberdownloads.com/apps/LoadnGo_Snip/index.php
http://www.screengrab.org/ -- For Firefox Browsers

Just remember, screen shots CAN be manipulated, just like your photos in Photoshop. Can anyone truly trust the words of the fanatics of AZU/ Pee-J? Consider their track record. Recently a member of Pee-J was arrested dor computer hacking (as noted on the front page at www.corrupted-justice.com). Is it real? Is it manipulated. That top screen shot is VERY real. Its currently on the front page of their blog. The second screenshot is a load of bullshit created by someone learning to use the new technology. Again, think about THAT next time you visit AZU or Wickisposure

A troll's life must be very lonely

Absolute Zero United has been very quiet as of late so they are desperate to try to drum up some support for their ailing site. Their Amazon boycott fizzled (just like their Disney boycott did... am I the one non-AZU member to even REMEMBER the boycott?). Probably the most lonely of them all is Loguehater, my personal stalker. There is nothing sadder than a loser who spends 24 hours a day stalking a grown man all over the internet and spreading lies, but since I've convinced my readers to Boycott AZU the only people who have talked to AZU is.. well... AZU themselves, and maybe that one guy who has always given them hell. Someone should tell that Nigel or Zandir or "spanky the clown" guy to join the boycott of AZU and watch the site wither and die, because the site thrives on hate. Of course, then AZU can just do what they always do and create fake web posts and slap their names to it like they have done to others to make it LOOK like they were there.

Case in point. My personal stalker, aka, "Logue Hater," a wretched soul that feeds off the misery of others, a predator in his own right (also known as Jacey). For the past month, I have all but completely ignored Absolute Zero United while working on various projects, including the release of a book in electronic format. So poor lonely "Logue Hater" sets up a new post with the following claim:

[blog link withheld because I won't advertise for that bitch]
Two comments were left on my blog from *****. He seems a little unhappy. Sniff sniff.

He put his "E-book" on the trials of being a p**** for sale weeks ago and has sold 4 copies! Wow! lol. Here he expresses the rage and mental illness that prove he should be civilly committed. ****, don't you realize that the people with the power to downgrade you from your Tier III Registered Sexual ******  status read all your internet writings? What a moron the c***** m****** is.

Of course two blog posts he claims come from me are listed there. Both posts are really from Logue Hater, as I was away from my computer to do other things. Now, what Logue Hater won't tell you is before he decided to create this latest post at his stalking site about me, he sent a nasty ANONYMOUS E-mail to this site:

Ha ha! Little ***** **** has only sold four copies of his shitty lil book. Do you EVER succeed at ANYTHING, besides [censored]?
So much for being a famous author! Well, at least you will always be hated by the world for being a *********!!!!!!!!
You will always be a ***********. it is fun watching you try and try and try for some kind of success and some kind of respect. Keep trying. I love watching you fail time and time again. 

Its really pathetic watching AZU time and time again to stalking in order to generate controversy. Reminds me of a tick... without blood, AZU writhes in pain. They feed off the hatred and sadness of others and found a cover to justify the fact they're nothing more than a hate group. Above is a tactic. I understand it is difficult to ignore these worthless fucks, but by responding to them directly, we are feeding the disgusting AZU ticks. I say boycott them and let them starve. And in the event they show up at your door, defend yourself by ANY MEANS NECESSARY. But trust me, they're too cowardly to show up.