Daydreamer of Oz-- Dumbass In Denial

http://forums.sexoffenderalliance.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1605

In response to an article in which the FBI plans to monitor suspected cyerterrorist activity, AZU alum Daydreamer of Oz offers up this idiotic statement:

daydreamerofoz
Post subject: Re: FBI wants widespread monitoring of illegal Internet activity
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:49 pm

"I don't have a problem with it because I do not engage in illegal activity."

OH REALLY? Then what's this?

http://news.justia.com/cases/featured/arizona/azdce/2:2008cv00054/366532/

"Kruska v. Perverted Justice Foundation Incorporated.Org et al

Plaintiff Kruska sued Perverted Justice Foundation Incorporated (www.corporatesexoffenders.com and wikisposure project), Xavier Von Erck a/k/a Phillip John Eide, Christopher Brocious (absolutezerounited.blogspot.com, absolutezerounited.com and absolutezerounited.org), Barbara W. Ochoa a/k/a Petra Luna, Filmax Inc. (www.jankruska.com and www.jankruska.net), April Butler, David M. Butler, Godaddy.com, Bob Parsons, and MySpace.com. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin Defendants from posting on their website claims that Plaintiff is a predator, pedophile, child molester and pro-pedophile. Plaintiff also charges defendants with intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, cyberstalking and violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act."

Absolute Zero United is among the organizations implicated in a FEDERAL LAWSUIT for CYBERTERRORISM! A lawsuit they will LOSE! WOW! Its like the kid with frosting on his face, afer ask him, "Did you get into the cake?" he says with his mouthful of cake, "MMM-NO"

This is just too funny for words!

Funny. Stitches 77 claims it was WASP Ohio whoposted some crap about me on their trollspot earlier in the year. WASP Ohio claimes it was Stitches 77. I say they're ALL guilty. That means YOU, Ozzie-boy

Troll Speak

You know, we need a translator when dealing with the trolls, so I have provided you a handy translators guide in the event you come across members of absolute zero united or even a member of perverted-justice:

"Antis:" How AZU identifies themselves. "Anti" is short for "antisocial," which is fitting when you consider their approach to anyone who doesn't agree with them, even a district attorney.

On Jan. 12, 2008, Stitches 77 says, "I could care less what an Iowa attorney says or ANY attorney for that matter." (http://www.robheri.com/2008/01/every-decent-human-being-is-this-world.html)-- The "Iowa attorneys" she was referring to was the Iowa County Attorneys Association, the group of PROSECUTING attorneys in that state. Disregard for legal authority is a hallmark of APD.

"Pedo Enablers:" Anyone who disagrees with their view of "kill all sex offenders." If you are not condemning them to death, you are enabling them. If you call for reform, you are enabling. If you are not aggressive enough in condemning them you are enabling them. Somehow, they came to the belief that calling for reforms to make sex offenders legislation sensible and promoting stuff like prevention and education, you are somehow excusing sex crimes. Remember, I've already noted in previous threads, Patty Wetterling and The Pope were among the list of "pedo enablers."

Ironically, the real definition of "enabling" is encouraging an action through support or creating an environment conducive to behavior. Ironically, the AZU harass/annoy/stress gameplan creates such an environment.

"Spin:" Essentially any interpretation of a study or stat that disagrees with their interpretations of it. Ironically, they are adept at having interesting intepretations of what people say. After all, they turned the Pope's message of healing for victims of the church's sex scandal into a blame game rant. Which brings me to:

"Blame Gamers:" Anyone who suggests anything for the healing process except cold revenge; also means any former offender who speaks out against oppressive sex offender laws.

"Victim Bashing:" Attacking, criticizing, or questioning any of their words or actions, even if you are doing so in self-defense from their actions. Somehow AZU thinks being a victim or a victim advocate gives them license to hurt others. And their favorite:

"Denial:" Anyone non-submissive to their whims. If you speak up against sex offender laws, you are in "denial." Guess they forgot SO laws aren't SUPPOSED to be punishment. Dumbasses.

Eventually I may add more to this as the need arises.

Messy Medic - Messy in more ways than one

Since you have a flair for posting crap up about others this one's for you buddy:

http://www.youtube.com/user/messymedic

Didn't your momma teach you not to leave your toys lying around the house? Did your mom have an affinity for KFC by chance? You just got have an uncanny resemblance to the Colonel.

Oh, and don't ever tell me absolute zero and perverted justice aren't connected. Nobody's buying that crap! Besides, you werekind enough to post it up on your Spew-Tube account.

Don't hate the playa hate the game!

RIP www.absolutezerounited.org. Wanna buy it?

http://www.sedo.com/search/details.php4?domain=absolutezerounited.org&partnerid=14460&language=e

FOR SALE BY OWNER: One slightly used website available for immediate purchase and release. A great rehab property, needs fresh paint. This site is HOT!

It seems http://www.absolutezerounited.org/ has retired. They must've decided to stop wasting their efforts helping victims of abuse overcome from and heal from the crimes committed against them, and instead focus on committing crimes against others they feel are "pedoheads" and "pedo enablers." Of interesting note, they only had 70 visitors on average. Guess not everyone's into committing crimes against others.

Considering the growth of lawsuits against them, they better hope it fetches a good price LOL!

The Show Must Go On

For four long months, I have endured the worst Absolute Zero United has to offer, including the mock blogspots, the videos mocking me, the Wikisposure page calling me a pedophile. False accusations. Slander. Cyberstalking (don't tell me googling your screen name for the sole purpose of telling everyone you're a "pedohead" is not cyberstalking, especially when you've done it numerous times). Phone calls at 3 am. My evidence file has grown in Megs over those four months.

The idea to create this site came a week ago, after so many people were harassed by members of Absolute Zero United, some of their targets figured the only way to show them how foolish they are is to create a counter site. Thus, Absolute Zero Unites was born.

For a week or so now, I have posted under a derivative name of the poster to took it upon herself to attack me for my involvement in a civil rights rally. So "Stitches" and I took it upon ourselves to fight fire with fire, so to speak. Why not repost their words (unlike AZ, however, its fully resourced AND not taken out of context). Why not expose their illicit tactics, like they "expose" allegedly dangerous individuals (without the posting of names, phone numbers, etc). Why not call them out on THEIR lies, misconceptions, myths, and fallacies? This site may have been thought up with the intention of being a "spoof" of AZU, but Unites is still a site based on the facts.

What do I hope to achieve? Well, I hope AZU sees how foolish they are in doing what they do. If a person is a "clear and present danger" as they claim, then you should contact LE; instead they take the low road, doling out their own brand of justice. They justify what they do by dehumanizing their targets, which excuses their attacks in their own minds; they pore through all your posts in hopes to find something that can be misinterpreted so they can justify their attacks; they choose to be bitter and hurt people because they were hurt themselves or have a warped sense of justice, or possibly just like hurting people. And sex criminals are easy targets.

Whatever the reason, there is no justification for engaging in such activities as posting personal addresses, claiming you're a "pedohead/freak," calling you at 3 am, or creating defamatory videos about you because hey don't like you. That is stupid, childish, and most of all, illicit.

So it came to pass I ran into Stitches 77, Daydreamer of Oz, and Messy Medic (who is replacing WASP Ohio as my least favorite), on a "neutral" site called www.sexoffenderalliance.com. Anyways, they weren't too fond of this counter site and demand I take it down. Well I have a list of demands, so at the moment, I called a ceasefire to at least try to see what the hell their problem is. So they basically want me to not be active in my cause. Too bad, I can't do that. And their other demands are even less reasonable. Essentially they want me to be quiet and do and say what they want and then MAYBE they will do what I ask. I DON'T THINK SO!

Until I see changes in how the absolute zeroes operate, and that includes wholesale reform of their sites (yes that includes all affiliates and contributors), then there is a compelling interest in keeping this site open. I consider Absolute Zero United a "clear and present danger" to society and to former offenders whose only real crime of interest to AZ is being bold enough to speak out against these laws.

There is a single that describes AZU's tactics of slander, defamation, cyberstalking, cyberharassment, and bullying tactics. It's called "CRIMINAL." And Unites (derivative names and all) will exist as long as the need to expose AZU as the criminal organization they are.

PS: Don't dish out what you are unwilling to take, AZ!

Oh My God! AZU calls Pope a Pedo Enabler!

http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/search/label/Catholic%20Church

So Pope Benedict XVI is added to the growing list of people considered "pedophile enablers." As mother would say, "Holy Mackrel!" Can you say BLASPHEMY? Read their "spin" on the papal address regarding the sex abuse scandal: (PS thanks to Daydreamer of Oz for this gem, what a veitible mine of stupidity)


Ozzie: What does this remind you of?

Pope: What does it mean to speak of child protection when pornography and violence can be viewed in so many homes through media widely available today?

Ozzie: Read: Its society's fault when a pedophile molests a kid because after all pornography and violence can be seen in the media.


Warped Ohio's take: The Pope has made a keen observation, that American obsession with all things sexual creates an environment conducive to illicit sexual behavior. Glorifying illicit sexual behavior ("Stiffler's mom, yeah") is not an excuse, but it is an observation that we saturate ourselves with this smut with, while simultaneously neglecting to educate our kids about what is acceptable sexual behavior.

Pope: Those who "have experienced shame over what has occurred" deserve guidance and support.

Ozzie: Read: Its the offenders we need to focus on and stop worrying about those pesky victims.

Oh Yes, Ozzie, lets focus on former offenders, lets forget about helping crime victims recover from harm so they don't spend their loves in bitterness and blind hatred, like you. NOT! You need to spend less time Daydreaming and spend more time in reality. Lets see, the Pope spends time talking to SNAP, looking to find a way to find a way to make reparations for what the American church system had done, and wants to offer them guidance and support to help abuse victims deal with the hurt. Ozzie apparently doesn't seem to understand that many times, the VICTIMS feel shame over what has happened. For a guy in a group claiming to be a voice for the children, Ozzie has little grasp on the concept of the shame people feel when abused.

AZU stated in a recent post up on their site, "spin is evil... the antis won't stand for it." Spin is evil? You just spun quite a web yourself.

I'm not a vigilante, I'm a blogger..."

http://www.wnyc.org/shows/lopate/episodes/2007/12/20/segments/90693/1

Stitches 77: "Why are you calling me a vigilante? I'm a blogger just like you." (She then proceeds to defame and harass poster)

vig·i·lan·te - n
1. law-enforcing citizen: somebody who punishes lawbreakers personally rather than relying on the legal authorities

If AZU targets were indeed breaking the law, they have a duty to notify the authorities, which they don't. Instead, they dole out their own brand of justice that involves:

1. Drudging up as much info on said person as possible
2. Posting said personal info at AZU or Wikisposure, with labels like "pedophile" and "pedophile enabler"
3. Video montages and pasting pictures of target in various idiocies like klan suits and horse's asses

"I'm not stalking or harassing. I'm uncovering your lies."

ha·rass - vt
1. keep bothering or attacking somebody: to persistently annoy, attack, or bother somebody
2. exhaust enemy with repeated attacks: to exhaust an enemy by attacking repeatedly

stalk

3. vt-- trouble somebody steadily and malevolently: to assail somebody in a steady and sinister way
4. vt law-- harass somebody persistently: to harass somebody criminally by persistent, inappropriate, and unwanted attention, e.g. by constantly following, telephoning, e-mailing, or writing to him or her

I think googling a name or screen name for the sole purpose to telling a forum in New York City some poster from a thousand miles away is a sex offender. Seriously who in NYC gives a flying flitter about that? But those actions are persistent. Lets see, following, check, persistence, check, malevolent, check, constant, check, inappropriate and unwanted, check and check, repeated attacks, check and check.

She then admits she was there to bother him:

"Do you need to be speaking to me for me to respond to your statements ***?
That's a new one on me. Nevertheless I WAS addressing YOU."

Before I finish, though, an ironic statement by Stitches of the seventy and seven:

"Religion isn't the issue, political affiliation isn't the issue, race certainly isn't the issue. The issue is about good and evil. You might can cure a mentally disturbed individual, but you can't cure evil. There is no cure for dumbass either."

Thankfully there is a cure for both evil,and dumbass, or we'd have to give up on absolute zero united.

(PS: for examples of persistence, all you have to do is read anywhere Stitches et al. posts, and see who she's bitching at)

The Pot and the Kettle

There is an old adage that describes the absolute zero mob to a "T," which goes something like this: "When you point a finger at someone, there are three fingers pointing back at you." I love how they point a finger at someone for "harassing" someone or "spinning" statistics, when they do it themselves. As WASP Ohio tells those she harasses who fights back, "Pot. Kettle. Black."

Lets see: AZ harasses a lady, puts her face on a horse's ass, a klan suit, an afro (in the post AFTER the klan suit), a Japanese Kamikaze plane flyer, and a video with a no-talect hack (who sings like cat-torture) in a blonde wig. So a friend of hers, in her defense, suggested pasting Stitches's face on a horse's ass just to see how she liked it, eliciting the following response:

"**** also believes it would be comical to make a parody of me by putting my face on a horse's ass." (the poster apparently later determined to do so would violate the rights of the horse)

(see: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2342563046529245882&postID=5538762935570923443&isPopup=true)

Stitches certainly left a few gems lying around (and we all know "lying" is a Stitches77 mainstay)

"It's always amazed me when someone like **** claims child advocates are 'vigilantes' Apparently she doesn't know the meaning of the word. It's also amazing that she would blatantly ignore the vigilante acts of ****** simply because she doesn't like the people she believes *** committed them against."

Translation, Stitches77 and associates posted up personal info on a target, target drudged up info on her own, and decided to show her how its done. The greatest insult to an individual who thinks they're the master of a game is to one-up her. By the way, Stitches77, apparently you don't know the meaning of vigilante, either.

Next Gem:

"In other words, she's defending the very acts she claims to condemn in others. She takes the word 'hypocrite' to a whole new level. She should be added to the dictionary as an example of the word. Urban dictionary would be a good place to start."

Pot. Kettle. Black. This is a statement as easily applicable to the very person who stated it. Absolute Zero United will post up lies, mockery videos and pictures, and personal info on targets. Then they piss and moan when it happens to them. Look out folks, an absolute zero united site will soon be created in an attempt to discredit absolute zero unites as a "pedo den," complete with mockeries of the names we created to mock them. Pot. Kettle. Black.

What's In a Name?

Well, we know our subject matter and they have given us a good basis. We can't rate them any lower than a zero but we could spice that up a bit by changing our name to
absolute freakin zeros or absolute perverted zeros so it would not be so bland.

Child Advocates?

In a recent study of 21 industrialized nations the United States placed 20th in child well-being. The Netherlands took first place. Looks like some countries still possess parenting skills and don't need the hype, the hysteria, the constant proclamations of how much they love their children or the online vigilante hate groups that use children and live to hate. I don't know anything about the laws in the Netherlands but their actions put our words to shame.
As a child advocate I think prevention is a win/win situation. Members of absolutezerounited fight that idea like the plague. They say such efforts diminish the seriousness of the crime. If there is no crime it can't be diminished but we aren't dealing with rational people. Stop It Now! is a legitimate organization with their focus on prevention and the children do come first. Check it out if you want to see real child advocates at work.

Biting Off More Than They Can Chew?

If you have ever visited Absolute Zero, you are probably aware they love to call everyone who opposes their rationale "pedophile enablers." If you type in the names John Stossel (From ABC News 20/20) and Sarah Tofte (of the Human Rights Watch), you'll find articles denouncing them as so-called "pedophile enablers.

Why?

John Stossel was labeled a pedophile enabler because he aired AZU alum Petra Luna admitting on national television she harassed an individual and stated this person "deserved" to be harassed by her. (PS: Petra Luna was more than happy to make her "fine organization" look rather foolish on national television).

Sarah Tofte was labeled a "pedophile enabler" because of the landmark report "No Easy Answers: Sex Offender Laws In The US," which called for wholesale reforms to the current state of sex offender legislation. (PS: This hasn't stopped them from QUOTING the work, I might add).

There is ONE celebrity they backed off of, however: Patty Wetterling. For those who don't know, Patty Wetterling is the mother of missing child Jacob Wetterling; the first registry laws were named for him. Last year, Wetterling expressed concern over the current state of sex offender legislation (see: http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/377462.html). Typically AZU responds with a typical report denouncing anyone who speaks out against toughening all laws against ex-sex-offenders as "pedophile enablers," but this time the site is silent. This does not stop them from blogging about it:

Stitches 77 wrote:

"Patty Wetterling is a pissed off mother of a sex offender who lobbied for victims rights when she lost a son to a sex offender, but is doing everything she can now to save her offending son. I hardly think you should be using her as an example"
(see: http://web.archive.org/web/20080414210038/http://www.robheri.com/2008/01/every-decent-human-being-is-this-world.html)

Or how about this one?


Stitches77: 1/19/2008 9:22:00 AM

"Patty Wetterling lost a child to a sex offender. But now that her other child IS a sex offender she wants to back off from her previous pro-child activism. She's hardly an unbiased source."

(see: http://166.70.44.77/comments/read_comments.asp?ref=8000744&PageIndex=5)

The hits keep coming:

On February 11, 2008 at 5:17 pm Vigilant Antis Said:

"Which Patty Wetterling story are you interested in? The one where her son was killed by a sex offender or the one where the other son became a sex offender and she changed her mind?"

(See: http://vigilantantis.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/andrew-%E2%80%9Cbilly%E2%80%9D-berg-repeat-sex-offender-child-predator-released-into-the-community/)

Now, try this: Google "Patty Wetterling sex offender son." Do you see any valid articles there? I didn't think so. AZU essentially pulled this out of the ether. I find this striking that they believe this but left it out of their main site. Why? Is it possible they bit off more than they can chew this time?

PS: If these links are no longer valid, I'll be happy to send you the copy I made of the quotes sometime.

They are all alike

You said
“How is that relevant if a paedophile isn’t having sex with a child and doesn’t have any intention of actually having sex with a child?”

I said:
The intent of one member of a social movement has very little to do with the collective goals of the movement. For instance, one member of Hamas stating that he intends to negotiate peacefully means very little in the context of the stated, written mission of Hamas - to destroy Israel by force.

These are the reasons that the distinction is still meaningful.

Stitches77 Says:
December 28th, 2006 at 7:28 pm

Overt Dehumanization

-Daydreamer of Oz

9 October 2006

If you didn’t know, overt dehumanization - a favourite tool of virtually all hate campaigns, past and present. AZU has been employing it since their beginnings

-Daydreamer of Oz

Stitches77 Says:
December 28th, 2006 at 7:28 pm

"The only way to truly expose how utterly devious and devoid of basic humanity they really are….. is for you to read how utterly devious and devoid of basic humanity they really are.”

So… what is the purpose of dehumanization?

Psychologically, it is necessary to categorize one’s enemy as sub-human in order to legitimize increased violence or justify the violation of basic human rights. Moral exclusion reduces restraints against harming or exploiting certain groups of people. In severe cases, dehumanization makes the violation of generally accepted norms of behavior regarding one’s fellow man seem reasonable, or even necessary….

Once certain groups are stigmatized as evil, morally inferior, and not fully human, the persecution of those groups becomes more psychologically acceptable. Restraints against aggression and violence begin to disappear. Not surprisingly, dehumanization increases the likelihood of violence and may cause a conflict to escalate out of control. Once a violence break over has occurred, it may seem even more acceptable for people to do things that they would have regarded as morally unthinkable before….

…Indeed, dehumanization often paves the way for human rights violations, war crimes, and genocide. For example, in WWII, the dehumanization of the Jews ultimately led to the destruction of millions of people. Similar atrocities have occurred in Rwanda, Cambodia, and the former Yugoslavia.

http://anu.nfshost.com/2006/what-is-azus-mission

http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/dehumanization/

Stitches77 Says:
December 28th, 2006 at 7:28 pm