You said
“How is that relevant if a paedophile isn’t having sex with a child and doesn’t have any intention of actually having sex with a child?”
I said:
The intent of one member of a social movement has very little to do with the collective goals of the movement. For instance, one member of Hamas stating that he intends to negotiate peacefully means very little in the context of the stated, written mission of Hamas - to destroy Israel by force.
These are the reasons that the distinction is still meaningful.
Stitches77 Says:
December 28th, 2006 at 7:28 pm
3 comments:
Many of us are well aware of the methods used by hate groups. Anyone with a different opinion is a target.
It is nice that Stitches and Daydreamer finally admitted their tactics. Your statements make it perfectly clear that this is NOT about the children but that is common knowledge to your co-haters and a world of people you hate. How pathetic you are.
Hating has it's advantages. My Christmas list is very short.
Von Erck also stated it wasn't about helping children. Its all about power.
Is there a "cure" for vigilantism, or are they doomed to be cyberbullies their entire lives?
Post a Comment