Stitches 77 to star in sequel to "Sleeping With the enemy"

Stitches77: 1/19/2008 9:22:00 AM

"Patty Wetterling lost a child to a sex offender. But now that her other child IS a sex offender she wants to back off from her previous pro-child activism. She's hardly an unbiased source."

(see: http://166.70.44.77/comments/read_comments.asp?ref=8000744&PageIndex=5)

So says the centerpiece of the Absolute Zero United Cult, Stitches 77. And yet, she's awfully cozy with one of her own targets, Jeremy "Static" Bolick. Remember, she's the one who "outed" him as a so-called "pro-pedo activist" and posted his registry flier on Wikidposers:"

http://wikisposure.com/images/2/2f/Staticrso.png

Lets see, CP, considered a "habitual offender," multiple offenses, and a Tier 3 offender. But you know what they say, "all's fair in love and war."

A funny thing happened during this war. Two enemas.. er, "enemies," fell in love. An "anti" and a "pedohead" joined at the hip. Its touching, really. Its even starting to rub off on each other. I already discussed how Stitches 77 is starting to sound like a sex offender apologist (http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/12/watch-out-for-stitches-77.html), but oddly, Jeremy (as he goes by at AZU these days) is starting to sound like an anti, and the antis are fawning over their new boy toy:

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/absolutezero/6818862979246261475/#59559

The problem for Nigel Oldperv is that words have meaning- and truth is truth, whether he ignores it or not.
Jeremy | 12.14.08 - 1:33 am | #

Controlling language can be an effective way to control public perception"
That's a very good point there.

Stitches
Stitches77 | Homepage | 12.14.08 - 3:41 am |

The problem for Nigel Oldperv is that words have meaning- and truth is truth, whether he ignores it or not.
Nigel respects words that have meaning only to him, and his perv buddies and supporters. Those words are words that distort the actual truth.
Whether purposely or not- his ignorance airs in believing his own words rather than words of truth.
~**Violet Leaves**~ | Homepage | 12.14.08 - 11:50 am |

Anti-Paedo, in addressing the Patty Wetterling mantra AZU was spouting earlier in the year said this:

On February 11, 2008 at 5:17 pm Vigilant Antis Said:
"Which Patty Wetterling story are you interested in? The one where her son was killed by a sex offender or the one where the other son became a sex offender and she changed her mind?"
(See: http://vigilantantis.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/andrew-%E2%80%9Cbilly%E2%80%9D-berg-repeat-sex-offender-child-predator-released-into-the-community/)

Which Stitches 77 story are you interested in? The story of Stitches the Anti and vigilante who called people like the Pope, Patty Wetterling, the Human Rights Watch, and others "Pedo enablers" for speaking out in favor of reforming some sex offender laws? The same Stitches who watch out for those who promote Romeo and Juliet laws?

Or are you interested in the Stitches 77 with a sex offender boyfriend, who now says its okay to have a Romeo and Juliet clause:

http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/Sex_offenders_try_to_erase_laws_marking_them_for_life.html?c=y&viewAllComments=y
Stitches77 - 9:13 AM
"However, we DO need a Romeo & Juliet clause, I agree with Zman there."

Hey, maybe this torrid love affair may educate the wicked bitch of the net. Maybe AZU will change into an organization that actually works toward protecting children rather than their current status as a dangerous cult and cyber-terrorist organization. Maybe something good will come out of this sob story. We can call it "Sleeping With The Enemy 2: Douche and Cunt."

Xavier Von Erck - Stitches 77's hero

Perverted Justice, the pudgy faced, gorilla bearded, closet pedo, and master-baiter and Absolute Zero Retarded colloborator Xavier Von Erck, in all his "glory," such as lying, claiming a reporter spat in his face, and and hurling insults. Between him and Petra Luna, who is worse (and dumber)?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjwtmw_sAk0

Your typical AZU troll

Seeing is believing, so watch Petra Luna, AZU alum now largely MIA (after her Shiitake Award winning performance) in all her "glory." THIS is what a typical Absolute Zero troll acts like.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCeEMVMtrL8



So, after seeing the video, is Petra Luna high, crazy, stupid, or all of the above? You decide. What's with the laugh, anyways? Its no wonder they think such things as Patty Wetterling as a sex offender while idolizing corrupt Mark Lunsford.

Joseph Duncan was the excetion, not the rule

The newest mantra in the AZU is inaccurate and quoted out of context. Why am I not surprised?

http://www.zimbio.com/Registered+Sex+Offenders/articles/131/Not+An+Exception+The+Rule

Anti-Paedo says:
The truth is that I am not an exception, I am the rule! Most sex offenders are just like me

- Joseph Duncan Jan 2004

So I went to Joseph Duncan's blog, and didn't find the quote.

http://fifthnail.blogspot.com/2004_01_01_archive.html

You won't find that quote there. Nor anywhere in the January 2004 archives. Does it really matter what Joseph Duncan feels anyways? No. Joseph Duncan doesn't speak for anyone else but Joseph Duncan. Of course, minor details like accuracy has never been protocol at Absolute Zero United. After all, they DID also claim Patty Wetterling had a non-existent sex offender son. And to think people actually believe what AZU says without checking the facts.

Of course, the true context of the passage, found in a different place, can be found below, in a far different place than AZU claimed it was in. [http://fifthnail.blogspot.com/2004/04/known-facts-about-sex-offenders.php]. In reality, most sex offenders won't re-offend, unlike Duncan, making him the exception rather than the rule [http://www.oncefallen.com/Recidivism101.html]. The problem is, AZU wants to find the worst people and attach it to those where it doesn't apply. Can I apply the Andrea Yates case to every mother in America? The problem is, in our paranoia, we have consumed people for behaviors which call for a reprimand wather than a criminal case [see http://www.oncefallen.com/CriminalizingTeenSex.html or http://www.oncefallen.com/youmightbersoif.html]. How can you compare these people, especially those having consensual teen sex with other teens, to a Joseph Duncan, a man who was a serial rapist/ killer? Only people as deluded as AZU can fail to see a difference.

Duncan was the exception, not the rule. The truth is, Duncan is as rare as a lottery winner. They exist, but are very rare. Duncan doesn't speak for the hundreds of thousands of individuals who have learned their lessons and have gone on to live non-offending lives. But stories of success is not what AZU stands for.

Absolute Zero United's  tactics are no different from the Ku klux Klan, who will point to every crime committed by an African American man and claim that is proof everyone they hate is evil. Or, they are not above slandering and lying to prove a point. Think about who you want representing this fight, a company like http://www.stopitnow.org/, a place that offers real solutions to a growing concern and issue in the USA, or AZU, who offers nothing more than lies and deception in order to promote themselves? I think the answer is obvious.

Watch Out For Stitches 77

Stitches 77, the queen of hypocrisy, says:

http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2008/03/common-thread.html
"Watch for someone who defends an 18 year old for having sex with a 14 year old, then when asked the question "Would you have done it if she had been 12?" the response being "Oh NO, absolutely not, there must be a 'line' somewhere" Completely overlooking the fact that there WAS a line and it was crossed."

But then says--

http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/Sex_offenders_try_to_erase_laws_marking_them_for_life.html?c=y&viewAllComments=y

Stitches77 - 9:13 AM
"However, we DO need a Romeo & Juliet clause, I agree with Zman there."

Thus, we must watch out for Stitches 77! The truth is, Stitches77 flip flops more than, well a pair of flip flops. If you read any tag at this site, you'll see what I mean. Stitches 77 condemned the mother of the registries, Patty Wetterling, as a "pedo enabler" with a non-existent "sex offender son"
http://www.robheri.com/2008/01/every-decent-human-being-is-this-world.html
http://166.70.44.77/comments/read_comments.asp?ref=8000744&PageIndex=5
http://vigilantantis.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/andrew-%E2%80%9Cbilly%E2%80%9D-berg-repeat-sex-offender-child-predator-released-into-the-community/

while playing apologist for Mark Lunsford, a man suspected of viewing child porn and using his daughter's death to cash in with a Hummer, a tricked-out chopper, and a $50k salary for a Foundation that does... um, what DOES it do?

http://blogs.tampabay.com/media/2008/02/bubba-accuses-m.html
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/pdf/Archive/Alt/alt.true-crime/2005-08/msg03708.pdf
http://www.haloscan.com/comments/absolutezero/1085764522737461800/#58437

Absolute Zero United attacks Patty Wetterling but defends Mark Lunsford. Ironically, Mark Lunsford's 18 year old son Joshua was arrested for sexual contact with a 14 year old girl, and went to court wearing a "Please Find Jessica" T-Shirt"

http://www.tboblogs.com/index.php/newswire/story/lunsfords-son-arrested-on-sex-charge/
http://www.operationawareness.com/Josh_Lunsford_justice.html

Just what is Stitches 77's position on teens having sex with teens? Depends on whether or not she is attacking another person or not. Anyways, Read the facts, and think about it when you see a member of Absolute Zero United, Perverted-Justice, or one of their "associates" blogs about other individuals.

Hypocrisy AZU Style

Is Mien Kamphf just words? The Anarchist Cookbook? The Hitman's Primer?These stories are obscene by any decent person's standards. Obscenity isn't protected speech. -- Rob Taylor

For once, a member of Absolute Zero says something somewhat truthful. Obscenity is NOT protected by the 1st Amendment. However, AZU is ignorant of what the word "obscene" is. Obscenity follows the Miller Test:

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/about.aspx?item=glossary#fightingwords

Miller test — The Miller test is the list of criteria used to determine whether particular material is obscene. The Supreme Court held in Miller v. California (1973) that the material is obscene if:
1. The average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, which means arousing sexual desire.
2. The work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law.
3. The work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. Court battles often focus on this third prong of the test.

But Rob Taylor is just a Rush Limbaugh wannabe who doesn't know all the facts. His examples given were not "obscene," but may fall under different non-protected speech. But AZU has never been the kind of organization to give you the facts to begin with. Nor are they privy to their own "cause" when it involves people like Mark Lunsford:

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/absolutezero/1085764522737461800/#58437

(Comment Board for "Nothing Below an Anti"-- ironically with an obscene description of child rape written by a member of AZU):

Stitches 77 says:

"RSO's claim Mark Lunsford had CP on his computer yet there is no evidence to support that. They have a news article, and there's a statement that there was a LOT of adult pornography on his computer and a cp image that didn't even know if it had been accessed or not found in the recycle bin. he could have received it attached to some of the adult porn he downloaded, who knows? The point is that people look at what they are interested in. If I saw someone with a computer full of cp I would think they were interested in children wouldn't you? If they had a computer full of adult porn and one image of cp I would think they were interested in adults and somehow got an attachment."

Really? I know of a case where that happened and AZU attacked the guy en masse. Who said it was one picture anyways? The Citrus County article did not say "one case." I had spoken about their attachment to Lunsford in a previous post:

http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2008/05/common-thread.html

Stitches also claims "sex offenders can't be cured," yet John Walsh admitted to having a sexual addiction. In the same comment link above, stitch-cunt says:

"John Walsh has said he was sucessfully treated for a sex addiction... Naturally they fail to understand that it's not illegal to have an addiction to sex, it's not illegal to sleep around, it's not illegal to have sex with people who can consent nor is pornography illegal. John Walsh's behavior in NO WAY equates to criminal behavior..."

Again, stitch-cunt has no grasp on sexual addiction. Many sex addicts commit a variety of deviant acts, many of which are illegal. Plus, having an affair is a great betrayal of trust that can leave emotional scars lasting a lifetime for those who do not heal from it. blind hatred in one hand, blind loyalty in the other hand. It leaves little doubt as to AZU's true intentions.

Speaking of obscene language, resident airhead Tracy "WASP Ohio" Golden adds another dumb random comment. No doubts as to the minset of the average AZU troll there:

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/absolutezero/3117440419980065395/#58964
(message board to "Rickysmom says, 'It was just horrifying' ")

I have an urge to write some stories for theraputic reasons.Anyone interested in a torture murder story about a woman getting even with sex offenders?It is just words.

Yeah. Its "just words" of a depraved individual who poses a clear and present danger to society and who should be civilly commited, along with her alter-ego who has devoted his/her life to creating a phony me and build shrines to me on a daily basis. I have an urge to write, too. A blog about a group of degenerate cyber-bullies posing as child victim advocates. In the end, it truly is about victimization. AZU gets off on rape, torture, and murder. What better way to hide their sadism and psychopathy than under the guise of "child advocacy?"